Abstract:Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 ± 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 ± 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 ± 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 ± 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 ± 3.24), VI (22.19 ± 15.00), and VFI (5.53 ± 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 ± 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 ± 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 ± 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 ± 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 ± 3.17, VI: 28.67 ± 14.72, VFI: 7.40 ± 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 ± 2.58, PI: 2.71 ± 0.56, RI: 0.92 ± 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 ± 1.93, PI: 2.20 ± 0.73, RI: 0.87 ± 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 ± 6.59) and the control group (26.89 ± 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.

OP01.08: Value of adding angiogenic factors to ultrasound Doppler criteria in the definition of fetal growth restriction

OC02.03: *Correlation of angiogenic factors PlGF and sFlt‐1 with severity stages of fetal growth restriction

Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

OC02.05: Angiogenic factors versus Doppler in term FGR and SGA

OP01.09: Ultrasound predictors of abnormal severe neonatal outcomes in late fetal growth restriction

OP05.05: Longitudinal Doppler assessment and perinatal outcomes in early‐set intrauterine growth restriction fetuses

EP08.10: Sonographic surveillance and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

OC02.06: Assessment of placental perfusion and volume with MR IVIM model and correlation with fetoplacental Doppler in late‐onset fetal growth restriction

EP08.43: Sonographic surveillance and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

OP05.01: Impact of Doppler and gestational age on the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses with late‐onset fetal growth restriction

The Application Value of Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound in Fetal Growth Restriction

EP08.41: Fetal adrenal grand: zone‐targeting dimensional measurement and Doppler studies in normal and growth‐restricted fetuses

EP08.54: Uterine arteries pulsatility index in the second trimester of pregnancy as a predictor of fetal intrauterine growth restriction

OP13.04: Predictive performance of combined screening plus PlGF for fetal growth restriction

OC20.07: *Significance of ductus venosus Doppler on monochorionic pregnancies with type III selective fetal growth restriction

EP08.05: Evaluating an algorithm to enable a consistent approach to manage fetal growth

EP08.11: Prenatal ultrasound for fetal growth assessment in obese women

OP05.02: Cardiac remodelling in late‐onset fetal growth restriction: any relation between the phenotype of cardiac remodelling and speckle tracking fetal echocardiography?

Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

OC02.04: *Association between adverse neonatal outcome and maternal hemodynamics and biomarkers in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction