Abstract:Summary Earthquakes can be triggered by fluid injection into underground formations. Fluid injection can cause large changes in the underground volume that exert stresses on nearby preexisting faults, leading to seismic activity. Assuming an increase in underground development activities in the future, our understanding of the mechanism underlying induced seismicity must be improved, and methods must be developed to properly assess the risk of seismic events. The objective of this study is to develop a seismicity prediction model that calculates the magnitude and timing of triggered earthquakes or seismic events occurring during various subsurface fluid injection activities. We developed an injection-induced seismicity analysis model that predicts the dynamic earthquake nucleation caused by changes in stress and pore pressure that occur during various subsurface activities. The governing equations consisting of the dynamic motion of the poroelastic spring-slider system, rate and state friction laws and pore pressure diffusion equation were solved using the embedded semi-implicit Runge-Kutta (SIRK) method. The dynamic sliding model was also incorporated into the finite element method (FEM) model, considering the variations in the stresses and pore pressures in the formation. A field case study was also conducted to compare the model results with typical microseismicity responses observed from hydraulic fracturing treatments in shale fields. Contrary to the popular understanding derived from Amonton’s law, the dynamic friction model revealed that a large normal stress on the fault leads to rapid sliding. A larger normal stress accumulates a large amount of elastic energy until it slips owing to fluid injection, nucleating large seismic waves. The poroelastic spring-slider model estimated reasonable microseismic magnitudes for hydraulic fracturing treatment but overestimated the time required to trigger a microseismic event under field conditions. To improve the analysis results, the poroelastic spring-slider model was coupled with a linear elastic FEM that considered the complex interplay of stress changes from hydraulic fracturing and the associated pore pressure variation in the formation. Compared with the field data, the coupled simulation model estimated a reasonable timing for the induced microseismic events when the increasing pore pressure during hydraulic fracturing penetrated deep into the formation. These findings suggest the existence of permeable natural fractures in the formation, which intensify early frictional sliding during treatment. The seismicity prediction model presented in this study simulates the magnitude and timing of seismic nucleation, helping to manage and mitigate the environmental impacts of induced seismicity during various subsurface development activities, such as oil and gas extraction, hydraulic fracturing, geothermal, and carbon dioxide sequestration. Moreover, the case study results imply that the time series of seismic events predicted by the model can be used to understand the possible fracture geometry and extent of fluid invasion for field applications. Key Terms and Phrases induced seismicity, subsurface fluid injection, rate- and state-dependent friction law, embedded semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method, finite element analysis

Geomechanical modelling of injection-induced seismicity: the case study of the Muara Laboh geothermal plant

Modeling of Injection Induced Seismic Events

INDUCED SEISMICITY. Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip

A laboratory study on fault slip caused by fluid injection directly versus indirectly into a fault: implications for induced seismicity in EGSs

Control of Seismicity Migration in Earthquake Swarms by Injected Fluid Volume and Aseismic Crack Propagation

A Stochastic Model for Induced Seismicity at the Geothermal Systems: A Case of the Geysers

Separating Injection‐Driven and Earthquake‐Driven Induced Seismicity by Combining a Fully Coupled Poroelastic Model With Interpretable Machine Learning

Post-injection normal closure of fractures as a mechanism for induced seismicity

Poroelastic stress relaxation, slip stress transfer and friction weakening controlled post-injection seismicity at the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System

Geomechanical Modeling of Fault Systems Using the Material Point Method – Application to the Estimation of Induced Seismicity Potential to Bolster Hydraulic Fracturing Social License

Analysis of Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity Using a Dynamic Sliding Model Incorporating the Rate- and State-Dependent Friction Law

Fracture Activation and Induced Seismicity During Long-Term Heat Production in Fractured Geothermal Reservoirs

Modelling of mixed-mechanism stimulation for the enhancement of geothermal reservoirs

Numerical investigation of the effect of fluid pressurization rate on laboratory-scale injection-induced fault slip

Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: The Case Study of the EGS Soultz‐Sous‐Forêts Site

Stress‐Based and Convolutional Forecasting of Injection‐Induced Seismicity: Application to The Otaniemi Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation

Decomposing significant factors of Coulomb stress and its components in injection-induced seismicity

Mitigation of injection-induced seismicity on undrained faults in granite using cyclic fluid injection: A laboratory study

The Role of Fault-Zone Architectural Elements on Pore Pressure Propagation and Induced Seismicity

Injection-driven fracture instability in granite: Mechanism and implications