Abstract:Summary Earthquakes can be triggered by fluid injection into underground formations. Fluid injection can cause large changes in the underground volume that exert stresses on nearby preexisting faults, leading to seismic activity. Assuming an increase in underground development activities in the future, our understanding of the mechanism underlying induced seismicity must be improved, and methods must be developed to properly assess the risk of seismic events. The objective of this study is to develop a seismicity prediction model that calculates the magnitude and timing of triggered earthquakes or seismic events occurring during various subsurface fluid injection activities. We developed an injection-induced seismicity analysis model that predicts the dynamic earthquake nucleation caused by changes in stress and pore pressure that occur during various subsurface activities. The governing equations consisting of the dynamic motion of the poroelastic spring-slider system, rate and state friction laws and pore pressure diffusion equation were solved using the embedded semi-implicit Runge-Kutta (SIRK) method. The dynamic sliding model was also incorporated into the finite element method (FEM) model, considering the variations in the stresses and pore pressures in the formation. A field case study was also conducted to compare the model results with typical microseismicity responses observed from hydraulic fracturing treatments in shale fields. Contrary to the popular understanding derived from Amonton’s law, the dynamic friction model revealed that a large normal stress on the fault leads to rapid sliding. A larger normal stress accumulates a large amount of elastic energy until it slips owing to fluid injection, nucleating large seismic waves. The poroelastic spring-slider model estimated reasonable microseismic magnitudes for hydraulic fracturing treatment but overestimated the time required to trigger a microseismic event under field conditions. To improve the analysis results, the poroelastic spring-slider model was coupled with a linear elastic FEM that considered the complex interplay of stress changes from hydraulic fracturing and the associated pore pressure variation in the formation. Compared with the field data, the coupled simulation model estimated a reasonable timing for the induced microseismic events when the increasing pore pressure during hydraulic fracturing penetrated deep into the formation. These findings suggest the existence of permeable natural fractures in the formation, which intensify early frictional sliding during treatment. The seismicity prediction model presented in this study simulates the magnitude and timing of seismic nucleation, helping to manage and mitigate the environmental impacts of induced seismicity during various subsurface development activities, such as oil and gas extraction, hydraulic fracturing, geothermal, and carbon dioxide sequestration. Moreover, the case study results imply that the time series of seismic events predicted by the model can be used to understand the possible fracture geometry and extent of fluid invasion for field applications. Key Terms and Phrases induced seismicity, subsurface fluid injection, rate- and state-dependent friction law, embedded semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method, finite element analysis

Geomechanical Modeling of Fault Systems Using the Material Point Method – Application to the Estimation of Induced Seismicity Potential to Bolster Hydraulic Fracturing Social License

Implications for fault reactivation and seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing

Modeling of Injection Induced Seismic Events

The Role of Fault-Zone Architectural Elements on Pore Pressure Propagation and Induced Seismicity

Mitigation and Optimization of Induced Seismicity Using Physics‐Based Forecasting

Integration of Microseismic Data and an Unconventional Fracture Modeling Tool to Generate the Hydraulically Induced Fracture Network: A Case Study from the Cardium Formation, West Central Alberta, Canada

Analysis of Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity Using a Dynamic Sliding Model Incorporating the Rate- and State-Dependent Friction Law

Application of supervised machine learning to assess and manage fluid-injection-induced seismicity hazards based on the Montney region of northeastern British Columbia

Mitigation and optimization of induced seismicity using physics-based forecasting

Separating Injection‐Driven and Earthquake‐Driven Induced Seismicity by Combining a Fully Coupled Poroelastic Model With Interpretable Machine Learning

Geomechanical modelling of injection-induced seismicity: the case study of the Muara Laboh geothermal plant

Evaluation of the fault reactivation dynamics using fully coupled hydro-mechanical models

Decomposing significant factors of Coulomb stress and its components in injection-induced seismicity

Focal Mechanism Determination for Induced Seismicity Using the Neighbourhood Algorithm

Induced seismicity potential based on probabilistic geomechanics for the San Juan Basin CarbonSAFE project

Improved spatial understanding of induced seismicity hazard from the discretization of a curved fault surface

Seismic Driven Geomechanical Modeling of Uplifted and Subsided Wells in Mumbai Offshore and Its Engineering Implications

Hydraulic Fracturing-Induced Seismicity Characterization Through Coupled Modeling of Stress and Fracture-Fault Systems

Interaction of natural and hydraulic fractures: the impact on reservoir pressure buildup and risk of shear fault reactivation in the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation, Fox Creek, Alberta

Microseismic moment-tensor inversion and sensitivity analysis in vertically transverse isotropic media

A synthetical geoengineering approach to evaluate the largest hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquake in the East Shale Basin, Alberta