0754 Sleep Sightlines and Soundwaves: Exploring Sex Differences in Sleep-Related Attentional Bias in Older Adults

Ashley Curtis,Amy Costa,Madison Musich,Lauren Nowakowski,Kobe Young,Chloe Rzeppa,Christina McCrae
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0754
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Insomnia disorder affects 12-20% of older adults, with 2x higher prevalence in women than men. Persistent insomnia symptoms may be influenced by excessive sleep pre-occupation and biases toward sleep-related stimuli (“sleep-related attentional bias”). Whether this bias is sex- and/or modality-specific remains unexplored. This study examined whether there are sex differences in visual/auditory sleep-related attentional bias in older adults. Methods Older adults (Mage=68.2±5.9) with (n=31; Women:20/Men:11) and without (n=50; Women:28/Men:22) insomnia (DSM-5 criteria plus reported 6+nights/14 of >30 mins sleep onset latency or wake after sleep onset) completed modified Posner Cueing tasks. Cues included sleep-related auditory (e.g., alarms, snoring), visual (e.g., clocks set to bedtimes, person awake in bed) and non-sleep (auditory: pure tones; visual: neutral International Affective Picture system images) stimuli. Valid [non-cued reaction time (RT) minus validly-cued RT] and invalid (non-cued RT minus invalidly-cued RT) sleep/non-sleep visual/auditory cueing effects were calculated. Two-way ANOVAs examined whether insomnia status interacts with sex it its impact on mean cueing effects. Results For visual valid (F=4.39, p=.039) and invalid (F=4.78, p=.03) sleep-related cueing effects, there were significant interactions between insomnia status and sex. Pairwise comparisons revealed insomnia men had larger (trending/p=.06) valid sleep-related cueing effects (122.0±20.0ms) than non-insomnia men (71.0±10.0ms). Invalid sleep-related cueing effects for insomnia men (123.0±23.0ms) were larger (p=.02) than insomnia women (56.0±16.0ms) and larger (p=.02) than non-insomnia men (57.0±15.0ms). For auditory valid cueing effects, there were main effects of insomnia status for sleep-related (F=4.39, p=.04) and non-sleep-related (F=6.32, p=.003) stimuli. Larger effects were observed in insomnia for valid sleep-related cues (insomnia:145.0±18.0ms; non-insomnia:89.0±12.0ms; p=.009) and valid non-sleep-related cues (insomnia:152.0±19.0ms; non-insomnia:81.0±13.0ms; p=.003) cues. Conclusion Visual sleep-related attention bias in older adults with insomnia may be sex-dependent, with men more likely to experience this phenomenon. Possible underlying sex-specific mechanisms include contributions of circulating testosterone to spatial attention and sleep-stimuli valence and/or threat detection. Visual stimulus desensitization towards insomnia triggers may be particularly beneficial in older men to facilitate sleep. Auditory attentional bias in insomnia may not be sex-dependent and reflect general auditory cortex hypervigilance. Support (if any) This research was made possible by an award (PI:Curtis) from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?