Abstract:Abstract Introduction Insomnia is diagnosed based on subjective difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, and early morning awakenings. Evidence of objective EEG abnormalities is mixed, in part due to small sample sizes and variable definitions of insomnia. This study aimed to explore these issues by comparing the insomnia case group and the control group on sleep physiology objectively measured depending on separate qualitative and quantitative self-reported insomnia symptoms. Methods Analyses are based on questionnaires and PSG data from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC). Two distinct insomnia case groups were defined. A qualitative insomnia case was defined as self-reported difficulty falling or staying asleep at least 3 nights/week for more than 3 months and moderate or greater impairment in daytime function due to poor sleep (n=350, 58% female; 48.47±14.38 years). The quantitative case definition required average self-reported sleep latency or wakefulness after sleep onset >30 minutes combined with the frequency and impairment criteria. (n=196, 62% female; 48.77±13.74 years). We also defined control groups without insomnia. Participants were excluded if they had sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 5 events/hour) or were shift workers. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) models, adjusted for age and sex, were separately conducted to compare the insomnia and control groups. The focus was on traditional sleep architecture variables, EEG power within specific frequency bands, and odds ratio product (ORP, representing sleep depth) metrics. Results The MANOVA analysis indicated significant group differences, with post-hoc tests identifying key variables responsible for these distinctions. In qualitative criteria, sleep onset latency, sigma, beta1, and beta2 in EEG1 and EEG2, along with REM and NREM ORP, were significant contributors to the observed differences. In quantitative criteria, besides the same result in qualitative criteria, REM stage and alpha in EEG1 and EEG2 played significant roles. Effect sizes were consistent across both qualitative and quantitative criteria. Conclusion While the analyses depending on qualitative and quantitative criteria did not have different effect sizes, some variables contributed to the group differences. As such, the results of this study support the idea that qualitative and quantitative criteria measure the same dimensions for physiological differences related to insomnia. Support (if any)

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Papers Try to Solve #### The First Paper **Title**: Comparative Analysis of Sleep Physiology of Insomnia Symptoms Using Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria **Problem**: This paper attempts to explore the differences in sleep physiological characteristics between insomnia patients and the control group, and pays special attention to the different manifestations in sleep physiology of insomnia patients defined by qualitative and quantitative criteria. Specifically, the researchers hope to compare the sleep physiological differences between insomnia patients based on self - reported insomnia symptoms (qualitative and quantitative criteria) and the control group through multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), so as to verify whether these two criteria measure the same physiological dimension. **Background**: - Insomnia is usually diagnosed based on subjective symptoms such as difficulty in falling asleep, difficulty in maintaining sleep and early awakening. - The evidence of objective electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities is controversial, partly due to the small sample size and inconsistent definitions of insomnia. - The study aims to explore these controversies by comparing the sleep physiological indicators of insomnia patients and the control group. **Methods**: - The data are from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC). - Two groups of insomnia patients are defined: - **Qualitative Insomnia Group**: Self - report difficulty in falling asleep or maintaining sleep at least 3 nights a week for more than 3 months, and moderate or more impairment of daytime function. - **Quantitative Insomnia Group**: The average self - reported sleep onset latency or wake - up time after sleep exceeds 30 minutes, while meeting the frequency and function impairment criteria. - The control group has no insomnia symptoms. - Exclude those with sleep apnea (AHI > 5 times/hour) and shift workers. - Use the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) model, adjust for age and gender, and compare the traditional sleep structure variables, EEG power in specific frequency bands and sleep depth indicators (ORP) among the groups. **Results**: - MANOVA analysis shows significant differences among groups, and post - hoc tests identify key variables. - Under the qualitative criteria, the performance of sleep onset latency, sigma wave, beta1 wave, beta2 wave in EEG1 and EEG2, and the ORP of REM and NREM are significant contributing factors. - Under the quantitative criteria, in addition to the above results, the performance of REM stage and alpha wave in EEG1 and EEG2 also play an important role. - The effect sizes are consistent under the qualitative and quantitative criteria. **Conclusion**: - Although the effect sizes of the qualitative and quantitative criteria are the same, some variables play an important role in the differences among groups. - The research results support that the qualitative and quantitative criteria measure the same physiological dimension related to insomnia. #### The Second Paper **Title**: Sleep Perception Error in Insomnia Phenotypes of Young Adults Based on Objective Sleep Duration **Problem**: This paper attempts to explore the degree of sleep perception error (i.e., underestimating total sleep time) in different insomnia phenotypes among young adults. Specifically, the researchers hope to verify whether sleep perception error is a characteristic feature of insomnia patients with normal sleep duration (INSD), and whether this feature remains consistent under different measurement methods. **Background**: - Previous studies have shown that insomnia patients may underestimate their total sleep time (TST), which is called sleep perception error. - There are differences in the degree of sleep perception error in different insomnia phenotypes, but these findings have not been verified in a sample of young adult population. **Methods**: - The research subjects are 270 young adults (median age 25 years, 53% female, 24% ethnic minorities) from the Penn State Child Cohort. - All participants had a 9 - hour polysomnography (PSG) recording, clinical history and self - report survey. - Insomnia symptoms are defined as difficulty in falling asleep or maintaining sleep, insomnia diagnosis or complaint, and use of sleep medications. - The short sleep duration measured by PSG is defined as the sample median (<7 hours), and normal sleep duration (NSD), short sleep duration (SSD), insomnia with normal sleep duration (INSD) and insomnia with short sleep duration (ISSD) are identified. - Subjective TST is obtained through the morning questionnaire after waking up in the laboratory and the retrospective survey of home habitual sleep. - Use general linear

0428 Comparative Analysis of Sleep Physiology Using Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria for Insomnia Symptoms

Comparative analysis of subjective estimation and polysomnography of sleep quality in patients with insomnia

0367 The Independent and Interactive Effects of Insomnia Symptoms and Short Sleep on Sleep Physiology

Differences Between Objective and Subjective Sleep Quality in Chronic Primary Insomniacs and the Correlated Factors

0969 Predicting Differences Between Objective and Subjective Sleep Parameters with Mental Health Questionnaires

Objective and subjective sleep quality and quality of life in patients with chief complaint of insomnia

Sleep Ectroencephalogram Physiological Characteristics in Patients with Depression and Insomnia

Elevated beta activity in the nighttime sleep and multiple sleep latency electroencephalograms of chronic insomnia patients

Validation and performance of the sleep inertia questionnaire in central disorders of hypersomnolence

Polysomnographic features of insomnia occurring in major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and bipolar mania: Comparison with primary insomnia and association with metabolic indicators

Subjective-Objective Sleep Discrepancy in a Predominately White and Educated Older Adult Population: Examining the Associations With Cognition and Insomnia

0106 Cognitive-Emotional Features of Insomnia Phenotypes Based on Objective Sleep Duration in Young Adults

Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: Comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording

Comparative Polysomnography Parameters Between Narcolepsy Type 1/type 2 and Idiopathic Hypersomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Insomnia Disorder and Hyperarousal: Evidence from Resting-State and Sleeping EEG

Quantitative evaluation of short-term resting-state brain networks for primary insomnia diagnosis

0427 Assessment of First-Night Effect in Patients with Insomnia Using the Odds-Ratio-Product (ORP)

On the relationship between EEG spectral analysis and pre‐sleep cognitive arousal in insomnia disorder: towards an integrated model of cognitive and cortical arousal

Neurophysiological Parameters Influencing Sleep–Wake Discrepancy in Insomnia Disorder: A Preliminary Analysis on Alpha Rhythm during Sleep Onset

EEG Spectral Analysis in Insomnia Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Revisiting nocturnal heart rate and heart rate variability in insomnia: A polysomnography‐based comparison of young self‐reported good and poor sleepers