Abstract:We develop a holdings-based statistic to measure the volatility of a fund’s investment style characteristic profile over time. On average, funds with lower levels of style volatility significantly outperform more style-volatile funds on a risk-adjusted basis. We show that style volatility has a distinct impact on future fund performance compared to fund expenses or past risk-adjusted returns, with the level of indirect style volatility being the primary determinant of the overall effect. We conclude that deciding to maintain a less volatile investment style is an important aspect of the portfolio management process. Current Draft: May 28, 2015 We are grateful for the comments of Andres Almazan, Nick Bollen, Mark Carhart, Dave Chapman, Wayne Ferson, Douglas Foster, William Goetzmann, Jennifer Huang, Bob Jones, Robert Litterman, Paula Tkac, Clemens Sialm, Laura Starks, Laurens Swinkels, Sheridan Titman, and Russ Wermers on earlier versions of this study. Earlier versions were also presented at the Financial Management Association European Conference, University of Texas Finance seminar, the Goldman Sachs Asset Management seminar, the Atlanta Federal Reserve Board Financial Markets Conference, and the Erasmus University Conference on Professional Asset Management. The opinions and analyses presented herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Putnam Investments. Investment Style Volatility and Mutual Fund Performance ABSTRACT We develop a holdings-based statistic to measure the volatility of a fund’s investment style characteristic profile over time. On average, funds with lower levels of style volatility significantly outperform more style-volatile funds on a risk-adjusted basis. We show that style volatility has a distinct impact on future fund performance compared to fund expenses or past risk-adjusted returns, with the level of indirect style volatility being the primary determinant of the overall effect. We conclude that deciding to maintain a less volatile investment style is an important aspect of the portfolio management process.We develop a holdings-based statistic to measure the volatility of a fund’s investment style characteristic profile over time. On average, funds with lower levels of style volatility significantly outperform more style-volatile funds on a risk-adjusted basis. We show that style volatility has a distinct impact on future fund performance compared to fund expenses or past risk-adjusted returns, with the level of indirect style volatility being the primary determinant of the overall effect. We conclude that deciding to maintain a less volatile investment style is an important aspect of the portfolio management process. JEL Classification: G11, G14

Equity Style Investing

Value versus Growth Investing: Why Do Different Investors Have Different Styles?

Culture, Thinking Styles and Investment Decision.

Style Investing, Mutual Fund Flows, and Return Comovement

Mutual Fund Performance: A Question of Style

Analysis on Different Investment Styles of Mutual Fund Investors

Managerial Style and Firm Value

The Presence of Style Drift in Active Mutual Funds: Evidence from China

Macro Factor Investing with Style

Style Classification Analysis of Chinese Mutual Funds

iFUNDit: Visual Profiling of Fund Investment Styles

Mutual fund intentional style drift: presence, motivation and performance impact

Investment Style Volatility and Mutual Fund Performance

Stock Price Prediction Incorporating Market Style Clustering

The trend is our friend: Risk parity, momentum and trend following in global asset allocation

The Economics of Value Investing

Accessing the Equity Return Volatility Effect of East and South Asian Nations: The Econometrics Modelling Method

On the Development of Style of Our Investment Funds and the Influence on the Stock Market

Non-parametric test on the style effect of return and risk in Chinese stock market

INVESTMENT BASED ON SIZE, VALUE, MOMENTUM AND INCOME MEASURES: A STUDY IN THE TAIWAN STOCK MARKET

Spreading the Style: the Effect of Firm Leaders’ Early Life Experiences on Employees’ Behavior and Performance