Abstract:128 Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects the quality of life, but there is no consensus regarding early detection and monitoring. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important in assessing cancer survivor outcomes. LYMPHA (Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach) and S-LYMPHA (Simplified LYMPHA) have reduced BCRL rates. This study aims to identify the most reliable PRO in a South Florida multi-ethnic population and to study correlations between PROs and objective measurements in the first 6 months after axillary surgery. Methods: Patients aged 18 and above undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiation were included. L-Dex (Spectroscopy) and three validated questionnaires (LyQLI, Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory; LyQOL, Lymphedema Quality of Life and FACT-B4+ Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphedema) were recorded at baseline and 6 months post-surgery to assess the association between patient-reported symptoms and BCRL. Lymphedema was defined as L-Dex score outside the normal range, or a 10 unit increase above baseline. Additional variables such as demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities were considered. Results: Out of 40 recruited patients, 39 were analysed (excluding one deceased patient). One patient was male. Amongst the females,18 were pre-menopausal and 20 were post-menopausal. Hispanic ethnicity was reported by 23 (58.9%) patients compared to 16 (41%) non-Hispanic. White race, African American and other races were reported in 31, 4, and 4 patients respectively. 1, 22, and 16 patients had Cancer stages 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Neo-adjuvant therapy (endocrine or chemotherapy) was administered to 31 patients; 13 and 26 patients had lumpectomy and mastectomy respectively. 18 patients had breast reconstruction. Patients were divided into three groups for analysis: 1) ALND with no axillary radiation (n=33,85%); 2) Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) with axillary radiation (n=3,8%); 3) ALND with axillary radiation (n=3,8%). In the first group, LYMPHA or S-LYMPHA were associated with lower rates of lymphedema (19% vs, 50%) (p=0.116). No patients in the second or third groups had lymphedema. There were 4 out of 20 (20%) patients with lymphedema with scores above the median for FACT B4+ (p= 0.41) and a lower score (higher quality of life) correlated with lower L-Dex value (p=0.76). The higher score in the physical domain of LyQLI showed higher L-Dex vaue (p=0.826). There was a significant inter-domain correlation in LyQLI and LyQOL (p<0.05 to <0.001). Conclusions: These preliminary results validate the use of PROs alongside objective measurements to assess BCRL. In addition, LYMPHA and S-LYMPHA significantly reduce lymphedema rates. Larger numbers will be necessary to reach statistical significance and to identify the best PRO.

Development of a core outcome set for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a Delphi study

Development of a core set of outcome measures to be applied toward breast cancer-related lymphedema core outcome domains

International development of a patient-centered core outcome set for assessing health-related quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients

Research progress of core outcome sets in the emergency and critical care patients/

Core outcome set for cardio-oncology: development of a set of outcomes for the cardiovascular assessment and monitoring of cancer patients and survivors

Development of a core outcome set for use in research evaluations of interventions for venous leg ulceration: International eDelphi consensus

PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Family and Community Nursing: Protocol for a Delphi Study

A core outcome set for patient‐reported dysphagia for use in head and neck cancer clinical trials: An international multistakeholder Delphi study

Development of an updated, standardized, patient-centered outcome set for lung cancer

Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set

Developing a Core Outcome Set for capturing and measuring nurse wellbeing: A Delphi study

Risk assessment, prevention and early detection of breast cancer related lymphedema: Objective measurements and patient reported outcomes.

Core outcome set for pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with COPD: results of a modified Delphi survey

Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Neurogenic Bladder Trials: Study Protocol for a Scoping Review and Delphi Surveys

A Core Outcome Set for Research Evaluating Interventions to Enable Communication in Patients With an Artificial Airway: An International Delphi Consensus Study (Comm-COS)

Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study

A core outcome set for lower limb orthopaedic surgery for children with cerebral palsy: An international multi-stakeholder consensus study

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Harmonising outcome measurement for child focused domestic abuse interventions. Reflections on the development and implementation of a core outcome set

Expert consensus achieved on a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus research in survey following the 5th International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (ICCLE)