Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s) Head and neck (HN) radiotherapy (RT) is associated with a substantial acute and late toxicity burden. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical in understanding the patient's perception of RT toxicity and may provide valuable data points in both clinical trials and the clinic. We sought to evaluate the concordance between clinician rated CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE in HN cancer patients treated with RT. Materials/Methods From 10/2020 to 02/2023 all new and returning patients to our HN RT clinic received a focused, HN-specific PRO-CTCAE toxicity assessment. The 11-question form contained 10 modified PRO-CTCAE items - HN pain, dry mouth, taste changes, difficulty swallowing, voice quality changes, hoarseness, fatigue, and a self-report swallowing item using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). At each visit, corresponding CTCAE measures were also collected. Encounters containing CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE data were eligible for analysis. The percent agreement between CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE was quantified using thresholds of 0 and 1 point, and strength of association was examined using Spearman's correlation. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. Results A total of 407 encounters for 197 consecutive patients were available for analysis: most assessments were collected at baseline (25%) or within 3 months of completing RT (33%). Among the included patients, the most frequent primary site was oropharynx (36%) and the majority had locally advanced disease (64%), were treated with curative intent (59%), or received concurrent chemotherapy (59%). When the threshold for agreement was 0 (perfect agreement), concordance between clinician and patient reported symptoms ranged from 49.1% to 71.2% (Table). When the threshold for agreement was set to +/-1 point, concordance increased to 81.3% to 92.3%. At both thresholds, agreement between clinician and patient assessment were strongest for swallowing function (FIOS) and weakest for dry mouth. For all symptoms, correlation between CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE were statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion In the setting of RT for HN cancer, we demonstrate significant associations between clinician and patient rating of symptoms using the CTCAE scale. Clinician and patient ratings were most strongly in agreement for swallowing function, suggesting that physicians can incorporate FIOS into baseline and follow-up assessment of patients receiving RT for HN cancers.

A core outcome set for patient‐reported dysphagia for use in head and neck cancer clinical trials: An international multistakeholder Delphi study

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Dysphagia Interventions in Parkinsons disease (COS-DIP): study protocol

Patient‐reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and appraisal of content validity and internal structure

Development of an updated, standardized, patient-centered outcome set for lung cancer

A Core Outcome Set for Research Evaluating Interventions to Enable Communication in Patients With an Artificial Airway: An International Delphi Consensus Study (Comm-COS)

Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study

Core outcome set for pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with COPD: results of a modified Delphi survey

Core outcome set for cardio-oncology: development of a set of outcomes for the cardiovascular assessment and monitoring of cancer patients and survivors

Outcomes of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: A qualitative study to inform a Core Outcome Set

Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Neurogenic Bladder Trials: Study Protocol for a Scoping Review and Delphi Surveys

Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation

Towards a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke: What should we measure?

Development of a core outcome set for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a Delphi study

Core outcome set for clinical trials of stent implantation in coronary heart disease -- a systematic review and mixed-method consensus study

COS-Speech: protocol to develop a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke for use in clinical practice and research

A Core Outcome Set for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Development and Recommendations for Implementation in Clinical Practice Through an International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Process

Utility of a Focused Patient Reported Outcome Assessment in a Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Oncology Clinic

Development of a core set of outcome measures to be applied toward breast cancer-related lymphedema core outcome domains

Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set

A Collaborative Approach for the Development of a Standardized Set of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancers.

A core outcome set for best care for the dying person: Results of an international Delphi study and consensus meeting