Abstract:OBJECTIVES: In 2019, only 7% of Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) cited a core outcome set (COS) in relation to choosing outcomes, even though a relevant COS existed but was not mentioned (or cited) for a further 29% of SRs. Our objectives for the current work were to (1) examine the extent to which authors are currently considering COS to inform outcome choice in Cochrane protocols and completed SRs, and (2) understand author facilitators and barriers to using COS.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We examined all completed Cochrane SRs published in the last 3 months of 2022 and all Cochrane protocols published in 2022 for the extent to which they: (a) cited a COS, (b) searched for COS, (c) used outcomes from existing COS, and (d) reported outcome inconsistency among included studies and/or noted the need for COS. One investigator extracted information; a second extractor verified all information, discussing discrepancies to achieve consensus. We then conducted an online survey of authors of the included SRs to assess awareness of COS and identify facilitators and barriers to using COS to inform outcome choice.RESULTS: Objective 1: We included 294 SRs of interventions (84 completed SRs and 210 published SR protocols), of which 13% cited specific COS and 5% did not cite but mentioned searching for COS. A median of 83% of core outcomes from cited COS (interquartile range [IQR] 57% to 100%) were included in the corresponding SR. We identified a relevant COS for 39% of SRs that did not cite a COS. A median of 50% of core outcomes from non-cited COS (IQR 35% to 72%) were included in the corresponding SR. Objective 2: Authors of 236 (80%) of the 294 eligible SRs completed our survey. Seventy-seven percent of authors noted being aware of COS before the survey. Fifty-five percent of authors who did not cite COS but were aware of them reported searching for a COS. The most reported facilitators of using COS were author awareness of the existence of COS (59%), author positive perceptions of COS (52%), and recommendation in the Cochrane Handbook regarding COS use (48%). The most reported barriers related to matching of the scope of the COS and the SR: the COS target population was too narrow/broad relative to the SR population (29%) or the COS target intervention was too narrow/broad relative to the SR intervention (21%). Most authors (87%) mentioned that they would consider incorporating missing core outcomes in the SR/update.CONCLUSION: Since 2019, there is increasing consideration and awareness of COS when choosing outcomes for Cochrane SRs of interventions, but uptake remains low and can be improved further. Use of COS in SRs is important to improve outcome standardization, reduce research waste, and improve evidence syntheses of the relevant effects of interventions across health research.

Research progress of core outcome sets in the emergency and critical care patients/

Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery

Core outcome sets for myocardial infarction in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine

Core outcome set for clinical trials of stent implantation in coronary heart disease -- a systematic review and mixed-method consensus study

The standards of obstetrics and gynecology core outcome sets: A scoping review

Development of a core outcome set for cardiac rehabilitation in patients with myocardial infarction: a study protocol

Development of a core outcome set for cardiovascular diabetology: a methodological framework

Core outcome set for cardio-oncology: development of a set of outcomes for the cardiovascular assessment and monitoring of cancer patients and survivors

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Family and Community Nursing: Protocol for a Delphi Study

The methodological quality of systematic reviews regarding the Core Outcome Set (COS) development

PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness

A Core Outcome Measurement Set for Pediatric Critical Care

A core outcome set for adult general ICU patients

Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study

Core outcome set in paediatric sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: a study protocol

Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COS-COVID)

Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists in China: a protocol

Core outcome set implementation supported by the BJD

A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study

Developing a Core Outcome Set for capturing and measuring nurse wellbeing: A Delphi study

Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers