Abstract:Background: Pregnancy and the postnatal period can be a time of increased psychological distress, which can be detrimental to both the mother and the developing child. Digital interventions are cost-effective and accessible tools to support positive mental health in women during the perinatal period. Although studies report efficacy, a key concern regarding web-based interventions is the lack of engagement leading to drop out, lack of participation, or reduced potential intervention benefits. Objective: This systematic review aimed to understand the reporting and levels of engagement in studies of digital psychological mental health or well-being interventions administered during the perinatal period. Specific objectives were to understand how studies report engagement across 4 domains specified in the Connect, Attend, Participate, and Enact (CAPE) model, make recommendations on best practices to report engagement in digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), and understand levels of engagement in intervention studies in this area. To maximize the utility of this systematic review, we intended to develop practical tools for public health use: to develop a logic model to reference the theory of change, evaluate the studies using the CAPE framework, and develop a guide for future data collection to enable consistent reporting in digital interventions. Methods: This systematic review used the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines. This study aimed to identify studies reporting DMHIs delivered during the perinatal period in women with subclinical mood symptoms. A systematic database search was used to identify relevant papers using the Ovid Platform for MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medical Subject Headings on Demand for all English-language articles published in the past 10 years. Results: Searches generated a database of 3473 potentially eligible studies, with a final selection of 16 (0.46%) studies grouped by study design. Participant engagement was evaluated using the CAPE framework and comparable variables were described. All studies reported at least one engagement metric. However, the measures used were inconsistent, which may have contributed to the wide-ranging results. There was insufficient reporting for enactment (ie, participants' real-world use of intervention skills), with only 38% (6/16) of studies clearly recording longer-term practice through postintervention interviews. The logic model proposes ways of conceptualizing and reporting engagement details in DMHIs more consistently in the future. Conclusions: The perinatal period is the optimal time to intervene with strength-based digital tools to build positive mental health. Despite the growing number of studies on digital interventions, few robustly explore engagement, and there is limited evidence of long-term skill use beyond the intervention period. Our results indicate variability in the reporting of both short- and long-term participant engagement behaviors, and we recommend the adoption of standardized reporting metrics in future digital interventions. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020162283; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=162283.

Knowledge of development during pregnancy and the transition to parenthood: Psychometric properties of the Domains of Development Instrument

Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Predictive Validity of the Postpartum Childcare Stress Checklist

Convergent Validity of Infant/Toddler Developmental Progress Monitoring Tools

Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population

Mothers’ parenting knowledge and its sources in five societies: Specificity in and across Argentina, Belgium, Italy, South Korea, and the United States

What tools should be used to identify women in need of additional support in pregnancy?

Using the DRS-8 to measure unresolved/disorganized attachment: Associations with states of mind on the adult attachment interview, psychopathology, and offspring social-emotional development

Measuring Early Childhood Development Among 4-6 Year Olds: The Identification of Psychometrically Robust Items Across Diverse Contexts

Validation of Parenting Your Baby and Parenting Your Toddler and Associations with Engagement in Parenting Intervention

Psychometric Evaluation of Women's Knowledge of Healthcare Rights and Perception of Resource Scarcity during Maternity

The reliability and validity of the Coder Impressions Questionnaire-Kindergarten for parenting and child behaviors

Enhancing comparability in early child development assessment with the D-score

Investigating the Transition to Parenting within a Digital Health Context

Development and psychometric testing of a scale for assessing the psychological birth trauma

Our path together: Development of the inclusive parenting goals questionnaire

Understanding Engagement in Digital Mental Health and Well-being Programs for Women in the Perinatal Period: Systematic Review Without Meta-analysis

The Index of Parental Activities, Context and Experiences (I-PACE): Psychometric Properties of a New Brief Early Parenting Questionnaire

Validation of an instrument to determine oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices during pregnancy

Testing reliability and validity of practitioner‐rated parental sensitivity: A novel tool for practice

Instrument about knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pregnant women about the hypertensive disease of pregnancy

Development and evaluation of measures to assess self-determination in peripartum contraceptive decision-making