Abstract:Children with autism spectrum disorder benefit from early, intensive interventions to improve social communication, and parent-implemented interventions are a feasible, family-centered way to increase treatment dosage. The success of such interventions is dependent on a parent’s ability to implement the strategies with fidelity. However, measurement of parent strategy use varies across studies. Most studies use one of two types of observational coding measures (macro- and micro-codes). Macro-codes are known for being efficient while micro-codes are known for being precise. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the NDBI-Fi, a macro-code, compared to a micro-code. Parent–child interaction videos for 177 participants were used to compare these measures. Results demonstrated that the NDBI-Fi had strong inter-rater reliability. It also had strong convergent validity with the micro-code after intervention. In addition, the NDBI-Fi was sensitive to change, and it demonstrated precision comparable to the micro-code. Furthermore, a novel scoring procedure detected differences in parents who learned different intervention strategy types. However, the NDBI-Fi did not demonstrate strong validity before intervention, particularly when measuring responsive intervention strategies. Taken together, findings support the use of the NDBI-Fi as an outcome measure, and future work should focus on continued development of valid pre-intervention macro-codes. Lay abstract Children with autism spectrum disorder benefit from early intervention to improve social communication, and parent-implemented interventions are a feasible and family-centered way to increase the amount of treatment they receive. For these treatments to be effective, it is important for the parent to implement the strategies as intended. However, measurement of parent strategy use is inconsistent across studies of parent-implemented interventions. This study evaluates the quality of the NDBI-Fi, an efficient measure, compared to a more time-consuming measure that is known to be precise. Videos of parents playing with their children were used to compare these two measurement methods. Results demonstrated that the NDBI-Fi was of good quality: scorers had high levels of agreement, the NDBI-Fi was similar to the more precise measure in rating parents after intervention, it detected changes from before to after intervention, and it detected differences when parents learned different types of intervention strategies. The NDBI-Fi was not as precise as the other measure across all strategies before parents learned intervention. Taken together, the findings of this study support the use of the NDBI-Fi as a high-quality outcome measure.

Testing reliability and validity of practitioner‐rated parental sensitivity: A novel tool for practice

The Relationship Development Assessment – Research Version: Preliminary validation of a clinical tool and coding schemes to measure parent-child interaction in autism

Validation of Parenting Your Baby and Parenting Your Toddler and Associations with Engagement in Parenting Intervention

The reliability and validity of the Coder Impressions Questionnaire-Kindergarten for parenting and child behaviors

The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation

Evaluation of effectiveness of (elements of) parenting support in daily practice of preventive youth health care; design of a naturalistic effect evaluation in ‘CIKEO’ (consortium integration knowledge promotion effectiveness of parenting interventions)

Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Predictive Validity of the Postpartum Childcare Stress Checklist

Child differential sensitivity to parental self-efficacy improvement

Measuring parent strategy use in early intervention: Reliability and validity of the Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Fidelity Rating Scale across strategy types

Psychometric properties of the Marschak Interaction Method of Psychometrics and the Assessment of Parent–Child Interaction within residential care and non-referred settings

Preliminary Validation of a Parent-Child Relational Framework for Teaching Developmental Assessment to Pediatric Residents

Reliability and validity of the responsive care tool for children 0–3 years old in a rural, South Asian setting

A taxonomy to assess the interaction between nurses and children: Development and reliability

Validation of the Dutch Infant Crying and Parent Well-Being Screening Tool in Parents of Infants Less than 12 Months of Age

Observation Worksheet for the Development of Self-regulation of 2- to 3-year-old Children (AOS)

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Retrospective Assessments of the Quality of Childhood Parenting: Prospective Evidence From Infancy to Age 26 Years

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Development and Content Validation of a Measure to Assess the Parent-Child Social-emotional Reciprocity of Children with ASD

Validation of the parents' version of the KINDLR and Kiddy Parents questionnaire in a South African context

The Relevance of Infant Outcome Measures: A Pilot-RCT Comparing Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Program With Care as Usual

Design and evaluation of the StartingTogether App for home visits in preventive child health care