Abstract:The traditional purpose of a corporation is to pursue maximized profit,and a corporation is only responsible to its shareholders.As corporate operations begin to have widespread influences on the society,corporate social responsibility (CSR) is being increasingly stressed.It is believed that corporations should have two identities as a legal person.They are not only entities in private law,but also true members of the society.Since corporations benefit from the society, they should also contribute to the society,i.e.,to bear their social responsibility.As the social aspect of the law looms large,private law (including commercial law) gradually shifts from individualism to socialism and requires people to pay attention to social environment and care for social interests.Therefore,the socialization of private law constitutes the solid legal foundation of CSR. CSR is one type of obligations a corporation owes to the society.It refers largely to social obligations required by law,moral obligations as well as obligations occurring during operations that are neither explicitly required by law nor of a moral nature.This last type of obligations is a problem that the board of directors needs to solve when it makes and implements business strategies. It is also a problem that requires solutions in both theory and practice. The beneficiaries of CSR are largely the same as the non—shareholder stakeholders of corporations. As the stakeholder theory poses the issue of CSR as one aspect of corporate governance, it makes it possible to realize CSR.Boards of directors should make necessary arrangements on the social consequences of corporate activities when they make and implement their business strategies. They must have an accurate understanding of the extent of their obligations in this respect and perform such obligations seriously.Directors' duty of care shall include not only to meet the corporations' revenue targets,but also to adjust the relationship amongst the corporation,its shareholders and other stakeholders and maintain equilibrium amongst various interests.Directors should primarily work for the long—term interests of all shareholders.Furthermore,they should also ascertain and respect other stakeholders and establish a harmonious and mutually beneficial cooperative relationship.

Responsive Regulation, Enforced Self-regulation, and Corporate Liability

Corporate Culture and Systems Intentionality: part of the regulator's essential toolkit

Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR

A new milestone in corporate regulation: procedural legalisation, standards of transnational corporate behaviour and lessons from financial regulation and anti-bribery regulation

Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Influence on Corporate Law Theory

Corporate Oversight and Disobedience

Influencing Companies’ Green Governance Through the System of Legal Liability for Environmental Infractions in China and Brazil: Lighting the Way Toward BRICS Cooperation

Corporate regulation in the public interest– from concession to authorisation

Regulation and Compliance Motivations: Examining Different Approaches

Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment

Corporate Criminal Liability in the Perspective of Rehabilitation: The Bewilderment of Walking without a Map

The social regulation of corporate social irresponsibility: Reviewing the contribution of corporate reputation

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: The Role of Executive Compensation

Optimal Regulatory Enforcement

The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence

Fighting corruption: A theoretical articulation of the themes of social responsibility, corporate governance, and agency theory

Promoting Corporate Extraterritorial Sustainable Responsibility through the Lens of Social Licence to Operate

Redefining Government Roles for a Fresh Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility

Filling the Accountability Gap: Misleading Conduct Law in Business and Human Rights

Government Regulation of International Corporate Social Responsibility in the US and the UK: How Domestic Institutions Shape Mandatory and Supportive Initiatives