The major barriers to evidence‐informed conservation policy and possible solutions

David C Rose, William J Sutherland, Tatsuya Amano, Juan P González‐Varo, Rebecca J Robertson, Benno I Simmons, Hannah S Wauchope, Eszter Kovacs, América Paz Durán, Alice BM Vadrot, Weiling Wu, Maria P Dias, Martina MI Di Fonzo, Sarah Ivory, Lucia Norris, Matheus Henrique Nunes, Tobias Ochieng Nyumba, Noa Steiner, Juliet Vickery, Nibedita Mukherjee
2018-09-01
Abstract:Conservation policy decisions can suffer from a lack of evidence, hindering effective decision‐making. In nature conservation, studies investigating why policy is often not evidence‐informed have tended to focus on Western democracies, with relatively small samples. To understand global variation and challenges better, we established a global survey aimed at identifying top barriers and solutions to the use of conservation science in policy. This obtained the views of 758 people in policy, practice, and research positions from 68 countries across six languages. Here we show that, contrary to popular belief, there is agreement between groups about how to incorporate conservation science into policy, and there is thus room for optimism. Barriers related to the low priority of conservation were considered to be important, while mainstreaming conservation was proposed as a key solution. Therefore, priorities should …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?