Abstract:Over the last 25 years, research on biodiversity has expanded dramatically, fuelled by increasing threats to the natural world. However, the number of published studies is heavily weighted towards certain taxa, perhaps influencing conservation awareness of and funding for less-popular groups. Few studies have systematically quantified these biases, although information on this topic is important for informing future research and conservation priorities. We investigated: i) which animal taxa are being studied; ii) if any taxonomic biases are the same in temperate and tropical regions; iii) whether the taxon studied is named in the title of papers on biodiversity, perhaps reflecting a perception of what biodiversity is; iv) the geographical distribution of biodiversity research, compared with the distribution of biodiversity and threatened species; and v) the geographical distribution of authors' countries of origin. To do this, we used the search engine Web of Science to systematically sample a subset of the published literature with 'biodiversity' in the title. In total 526 research papers were screened-5% of all papers in Web of Science with biodiversity in the title. For each paper, details on taxonomic group, title phrasing, number of citations, study location, and author locations were recorded. Compared to the proportions of described species, we identified a considerable taxonomic weighting towards vertebrates and an under-representation of invertebrates (particularly arachnids and insects) in the published literature. This discrepancy is more pronounced in highly cited papers, and in tropical regions, with only 43% of biodiversity research in the tropics including invertebrates. Furthermore, while papers on vertebrate taxa typically did not specify the taxonomic group in the title, the converse was true for invertebrate papers. Biodiversity research is also biased geographically: studies are more frequently carried out in developed countries with larger economies, and for a given level of species or threatened species, tropical countries were understudied relative to temperate countries. Finally, biodiversity research is disproportionately authored by researchers from wealthier countries, with studies less likely to be carried out by scientists in lower-GDP nations. Our results highlight the need for a more systematic and directed evaluation of biodiversity studies, perhaps informing more targeted research towards those areas and taxa most depauperate in research. Only by doing so can we ensure that biodiversity research yields results that are relevant and applicable to all regions and that the information necessary for the conservation of threatened species is available to conservation practitioners.

The challenge of biased evidence in conservation

Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision-making in conservation

Prioritizing future evidence needs for marine and freshwater mammal conservation action

The need for evidence-based conservation

Amphibian conservation

The major barriers to evidence‐informed conservation policy and possible solutions

A severe lack of evidence limits effective conservation of the world's primates

Defining and using evidence in conservation practice

Amphibian conservation: global evidence for the effects of interventions

The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions

Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database

A Severe Lack of Evidence Limits Effective Conservation of the World's Primates.

Bat conservation: global evidence for the effects of interventions

Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science

Sampling Biases Shape Our View of the Natural World

Taxonomic bias in conservation research

Scientific research on animal biodiversity is systematically biased towards vertebrates and temperate regions

Response to Mathevet and Mauchamp: Evidence-based conservation: dealing with social issues

Land‐use change and biodiversity: Challenges for assembling evidence on the greatest threat to nature

What works in conservation 2021

The positive impact of conservation action