Abstract:The UK Government is hosting COP26 in Glasgow between 31st October and 12th November 2021. It plans to make progress in four key areas which summarize as ‘coal, cars, cash and trees’ (Carbon Brief, 2021). The first two of these aims— to get agreement for the rapid phase out of coal, the most polluting of fossil fuels, and to ensure a rapid transition away for cars fuelled by fossil fuels— are very important, but are not directly related to the remit of Global Change Biology. The latter two aims— ensuring that the financial support of $100 billion per year promised in 2010 by wealthy countries to developing countries finally gets delivered and ensuring that climate solutions adopted also codeliver to nature— are squarely within the remit of Global Change Biology. With respect to the ‘cash’ aim, this flow of finance is essential to allow poorer countries to adapt to, and to mitigate, climate change. We know that a vast proportion of the potential for natural climate solutions is located in the developing world (Griscom et al., 2020), so if we are to realize that global potential, developing countries must have the financial backing to ensure that this happens in an equitable and just way. Not all of this cash will be used for naturebased solutions, of course, but a proportion of it will be, and naturebased solutions would almost certainly not happen at the scale and speed required to help us meet net zero greenhouse gas emissions targets without this cash. With respect to the ‘trees’ aim, the first thing to note is that naturebased solutions are about so much more than just planting trees (Seddon et al., 2021)! ‘Trees’ is just shorthand for naturebased solutions, but the broad variety of naturebased solutions available, beyond just tree planting, must be encouraged at COP26. The recent joint workshop report by IPBES and IPCC (Pörtner et al., 2021) demonstrated that we cannot successfully resolve either of the existential threats of climate change or biodiversity loss unless we tackle them both together. Mainstreaming nature into our thinking on climate action is essential, so encouraging all countries to include naturebased solutions in their nationally determined contributions to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement will be the first step in formalizing these considerations. But not all greenhouse gas removal options available on land or in the oceans constitute naturebased solutions— naturebased solutions must also provide benefits to human wellbeing and biodiversity— so the way in which they are implemented is crucial. Parties to the COP should be encouraged to adopt international guidelines for naturebased solutions, such as those provided by IUCN (2021), or those suggested by the NatureBased Solutions Initiative (NBSI, 2021), which are as follows: • Naturebased solutions are not a substitute for the rapid phaseout of fossil fuels and must not delay urgent action to decarbonize our economies. • Naturebased solutions involve the protection, restoration and/ or management of a wide range of natural and seminatural ecosystems on land and in the sea; the sustainable management of aquatic systems and working lands; or the creation of novel ecosystems in and around cities or across the wider landscape. • Naturebased solutions are designed, implemented, managed and monitored by or in partnership with Indigenous peoples and local communities through a process that fully respects and champions local rights and knowledge, and generates local benefits. • Naturebased solutions support or enhance biodiversity, that is, the diversity of life from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem.

The identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation

A horizon scan of global biological conservation issues for 2024

One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice

Setting research priorities for effective management of a threatened ecosystem: Australian alpine and subalpine peatland

Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world

Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water

A 2017 Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation and Biological Diversity

Grand challenges in entomology: Priorities for action in the coming decades

Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan

Conserving urban biodiversity: Current practice, barriers, and enablers

Think Before You Act: Improving the Conservation Outcomes of CITES Listing Decisions

Horizon scanning for South African biodiversity: A need for social engagement as well as science

Global research priorities for historical ecology to inform conservation

Essential Outcomes for COP26

An assessment of the state of conservation planning in Europe

The UK's 25 Year Plan for the Environment and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Gaps, Synergies and Opportunities

A multi-taxon analysis of European Red Lists reveals major threats to biodiversity

A global horizon scan of issues impacting marine and coastal biodiversity conservation

Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation

A multi-stakeholder strategy to identify conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia

Modelling trade offs between public and private conservation policies