Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

A Motivation Model of Peer Assessment in Programming Language Learning

Improve Feedback Mechanism in Programming Assessment Systems with Progress Indicators and Reward to Foster Students' Growth Mindset: (abstract Only)

Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs

Examining the Effects of a Real-Time, Knowledge-Aware Tool for Academic Writing Assessment

Effect of Scaffolding and Peer Review on Learning in a PAD Class

PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization

AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents

Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale

A Study of Peer Assessment of English Writing in High School

Engaging Software Engineering Students in Grading: The effects of peer assessment on self-evaluation, motivation, and study time

An Empirical Study of the Impact of Peer Assessment on Teamwork from the Perspective of Experiential FL Teaching and Learning

Design and evaluation of a revised ARCS motivational model for online classes in higher education

On novel peer review system for academic journals: analysis based on social computing

Enhanced Peer Assessment in MOOC Evaluation Through Assignment and Review Analysis

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Exploring Peer Review in the Computer Science Classroom

Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies Via Simulation

An Empirical Implementation of Peer Review in Software Development

Peer assessment in MOOCs: Systematic literature review

Developers perception of peer code review in research software development

Towards Understanding Teacher Mentoring, Learner WCF Beliefs, and Learner Revision Practices Through Peer Review Feedback: A Sociocultural Perspective