Abstract:Introduction: Appropriate tools and references are essential for evaluating individuals' cognitive levels. This study validated the Taiwan version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and provided normative data for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and ADAS-cog in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog were administered to 150 nondemented healthy adults aged 55–85 years during 2018–2020 as part of the Northeastern Taiwan Community Medicine Research Cohort. ADAS-cog was translated from the original English version to traditional Chinese with cultural and language considerations in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha (α) tested the reliability of ADAS-cog, and Pearson correlations examined its external validity using MMSE and MoCA as comparisons. Normative data were generated and stratified by age and education, and the one-way analysis of variance compared scores between age and education groups. Another 20 hospital-acquired participants with cognitive impairment joined the 150 healthy participants. Comparisons in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) tiers tested the discriminability of the tests for different cognitive levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyzed the power of ADAS-cog in predicting CDR 0.5 from CDR 0. Results: The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog had fair reliability between items (α = 0.727) and good correlations to MMSE ( r = −0.673, p #x3c; 0.001) and MoCA ( r = −0.746, p #x3c; 0.001). The normative data of MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog showed ladder changes with age ( p = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.437) and education ( p #x3c; 0.001, #x3c;0.001, and #x3c;0.001) in the 150 nondemented older adults. Next, in the 170 mixed participants from the communities and the hospital, MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog scores were well differentiable between CDR 0, 0.5, and 1. In addition, ADAS-cog discriminated CDR 0.5 from 0 by an AUROC of 0.827 ( p #x3c; 0.001). Discussion/Conclusion: The three structured cognitive tests consistently reflect cognitive levels of healthy older adults. The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog is compatible with MMSE and MoCA to distinguish people with mildly impaired from normal cognition. In addition, this study derived MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog norms tailored to demographic factors. The findings highlight the need for stratification of age and education rather than applying a fixed cutoff for defining normal and abnormal cognition. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

Examining the Measurement Equivalence of Alzheimer Disease Research Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery (Version 3) Between Singapore and US Samples

The Discriminant Validity of Single-Question Assessments of Subjective Cognitive Complaints in an Asian Older Adult Population.

Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan

Discriminant Validity and Time‐effectiveness of A Stepwise Dementia Case‐finding Approach in an Asian Elderly Community

Psychometric Properties of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network Neuropsychological Battery in an Asian Older Adult Sample.

A Comparative Study of Three Dementia Screening Instruments (CSI-D, CMMSE, and ECAQ) in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population

A Neuropsychological Battery for the Evaluation of Dementia Among Mandarin-Speaking Older Adults in the United States

Abstract TP440: The Discriminant Validity of the NINDS-CSN Harmonization Neurocognitive Battery in Detecting VCI in Singaporean Patients with Ischemic Stroke and TIA

Alzheimer's Disease Instruments Validation Study in Asia

A1362 Bayesian Estimation on Diagnostic Performance of Dementia Screening Tests in the Absence of a Gold Standard

Robust reference group normative data for neuropsychological tests accounting for primary language use in Asian American older adults

A Study on Reliability and Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Eastern China: Preliminary Findings

Cross-cultural difference and validation of the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults residing in Eastern China: preliminary findings.

A Comparison Study of Mild Cognitive Impairment with 3 Memory Tests among Chinese Individuals.

The Reliability and Validity of the Informant Ad8 by Comparison with A Series of Cognitive Assessment Tools in Primary Healthcare

Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of neuropsychological test battery

Validation of the Informant Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) among Older Adults in Singapore

Population Normative Data for the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Cognitive Test Battery from Latin America, India and China: a Cross-Sectional Survey

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Part

Low Accuracy of Brief Cognitive Tests in Tracking Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in an Asian Elderly Cohort