P4‐170: Alzheimer's Disease Instrument Validation Study in Asia

Holly Yu,Jianzhao Shen,Qi Shen,Zhenxin Zhang,Seong Yoon Kim,Timothy Kwok,Christopher Chen,Shuu‐Jiun Wang,Dong Hoon Lee,Huali Wang,Jeffrey L. Cummings,J. Kevin Harrison,Ronald S. Black
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2193
2011-01-01
Abstract:One major challenge of including Asian subjects in Alzheimer's disease (AD) drug development is the unclear validity of AD instruments in Asians with diverse cultures and languages. This study is to assess if the major established AD instruments are valid and reliable for use among Asians and if they are sensitive to detect disease severity and progression. This study consists of two steps: linguistic and psychometric validation. Linguistic validation started with a thorough AD instrument assessment. They were carefully selected based on their recognition from regulatory agencies, the medical community and appropriateness for Asian cultures. A vigorous step-by-step translation processes were in place to ensure the translated versions were conceptually equivalent to the original versions and culturally relevant. Psychometric validation is performed via a multicenter, longitudinal, noninterventional study. Five countries/regions (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea) were selected. Approximately 250 subjects with mild to moderate AD and 50 with normal cognition from 24 sites are to be enrolled and evaluated over 78 weeks. A caregiver/study partner is required to be with the study subject for each visit to answer questions from caregiver-reported instruments. The linguistic validation of ADAS-Cog, DAD and NTB, as primary instruments for validation, has completed, which yielded 7 translated versions including China Simplified Chinese, Taiwan Traditional Chinese, Hong Kong Chinese, Hong Kong English, Singapore Chinese, Singapore English and Korean. The psychometric validation study is currently on-going. The enrollment will be completed by May 2011. When ICAD is held, screening, baseline data and partial longitudinal observation will provide valuable information about the instruments, in terms of statistical distribution of the scales, potential floor or ceiling effects, the baseline construct validity and reliability. The sensitivity to detect the disease progress will be available in the end of the study. This is the first validation study to enable the assessment of multiple AD instruments in multiple Asian countries/regions. The validated and harmonized instruments in conjunction with the experience from this process will significantly increase our capacity to conduct future AD studies in Asia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?