Abstract:Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device and coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction are required due to the occurrence of systemic infection, malfunction, or upgrade. Relevant research of CS lead extraction is rare, especially in developing countries because of the high cost and lack of specialized tools. We aimed to evaluate percutaneous extraction of CS leads by modified conventional techniques.Methods Of 200 patients referred for lead extraction from January 2007 to June 2011, 24 (12.0%) involved CS leads (24 CS leads). We prospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, optimized extraction techniques and feasibility of extraction.Results Complete procedural success was achieved in 23 patients (95.8%), and the clinical success in 24 patients (100.0%). The leading indication for CS lead extraction was infection (66.7%). Mean implant duration was (29.5 +/- 20.2) months (range, 3-78 months). Sixteen CS leads (66.6%) were removed with locking stylets plus manual traction by superior transvenous approach. Mechanical dilatation and counter-traction was required to free fibrotic adhesions and extract 4 CS leads (16.7%), which had longer implant duration than other leads ((62.5 +/- 12.3) vs. (22.9 +/- 14.1) months, P<0.05). Another 4 CS (16.7%) leads were removed by modified and innovative snare techniques from femoral vein approach. Median extraction time was 11 minutes (range, 3-61 minutes) per CS lead, which had significant correlation with implant duration (r = 0.8, P<0.001). Sixteen patients (66.6%) were reimplanted with new devices at a median of 7.5 days after extraction. Median followed-up was 23.5 months (range, 8-61 months), three patients died due to sudden cardiac death (26 months), heart failure (45 and 57 months, respectively).Conclusion The modified procedure was proved to be practical for percutaneous extraction of CS leads, especially in developing countries lacking expensive powered sheaths. Chin Med J 2012;125(20):3707-3711

Lead Management in Special Scenarios

Traditional and Non-traditional Lead Extraction Techniques

A Rare Phenomenon among 3847 Lead Extraction Procedures

Safety and efficacy of combined dilation/stenting of venous abnormalities, including complete obstructions, during lead extractions in patients with congenital heart disease

Pitfalls and tips for lumenless lead extraction inserted deep within the ventricular septum

Practical Approaches to Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures-Clinical Case Series

Open Chest Approach Lead Extraction in a Patient with a Large Vegetation: The Importance of Multidisciplinary Approach, Advanced Imaging, and Procedural Planning

Unintended Sequalae of Long-Term Transvenous Pacemaker Leads in a Patient With Congenital Heart Disease

When and how to perform venoplasty for lead placement

Systematic Review of Leadless Pacemaker

Transvenous laser lead extraction in patients with congenital complete heart block

Transvenous Extraction and Removal of Pacing Leads Placed after Cardiac Transplantation

Preoperative and Intraoperative Imaging during Transvenous Lead Extraction

Re-evaluation of Transvenous Lead Extraction with Modified Standard Technique: a Prospective Study in 229 Patients.

A Large Single-Center Clinical Trial of Transvenous Lead Extraction

Managing superior vena cava syndrome in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device leads: Strategies and considerations

Risk factors for severe complications of transvenous lead extraction

Inadvertent transarterial lead placement in the left ventricle and aortic cusp: percutaneous lead removal with carotid embolic protection and stent graft placement

Out with the old: Single center experience with transvenous extraction of leads older than 15 years

Percutaneous Extraction of Leads from Coronary Sinus Vein and Branch by Modified Techniques.

Risk Factors and Temporal Trends of Complications Associated With Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Leads.