Abstract:Abstract INTRODUCTION patients undergoing planned cardioversion have high risk of left atrial appendage (LAA) trombosis. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is usually performed to rule out LAA thrombosis. PURPOSE building a model for predicting the risk of thrombosis of LAA prior to TEE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) planned to cardioversion based anamnesis, clinic and transthoracic echocardiography (echo) using deep learning algorithms. METHODS From 12.2018, 100 patients with AF included in the hospital registry or planned cardioversion. All patients underwent echo and TEE . Other clinical data was collected from medical records, echo and TEE results. Deep learning neural network was constructed in R v. 3.5.3 for risk assessment of the LAA trombosis prior to TEE. The model was trained / verified for 70% / 30% included patients. RESULTS Among included, 47.0% were women, mean age was 67.8 ± 11.9 years. LAA thrombosis rate was 37.0%. The paroxysmal form of AF diagnosed in 22.0%, the rest had persistent form. Arterial hypertension was observed in 77.0%, diabetes mellitus - in 14.0%. Previous stroke was diagnosed in 5.0% of patients, previous myocardial infarction — in 3.0%, heart failure - in 51.0% of patients. Median of CHA2DS2VASc score was 3 (2; 4) points. The mean indexed volume of left atrium was 50.1 ± 13.7 ml/m2, for LAA - 4.0 ± 1.8 ml/m2. Mean ejection velocity in the LAA is 3.5 ± 1.3 cm/s. Before admission 24.0% of patients did not receive any anticoagulant therapy. The group was divided into «training» and «test» parts in the proportion of 70%/30%. Both groups were statistically comparable by cardiovascular deseases, risk factors, demography, age and treatment before admission. Neural network was trained on the following factors of the «training» group: gender, previous infarction, heart failure, score for CHA2DS2VASc, creatinine level, left atrial indexed volume and linear dimensions, transmitral E and mitral annulus e`, peak and mean pressures and square of mitral regurgitation, pulmonary veins systolic and diastolic flows, anamnestic anticoagulation and duration of its intake. 10-fold cross-validation was performed. Verification (comparison of the real results with the predicted by model) was made for the «test» group: the Cohen’s kappa was 0.68, 95%CI for positive predictive value was 65.3 - 98.6%, for negative predictive value - 35.9 - 99.6%, for model accuracy 67.6 - 97.3% , ROC analysis showed 91.7% for area under curve (95%CI 79.3 - 99.9%). CONCLUSION deep learning neural net for assessing the risk of thrombosis of LAA using only anamnestic and echo data can be used for experimentally prediction for pretest probability of thrombosis prior to TEE. Further verification of the model with more data is required.

Predictors of left atrial appendage emptying velocity: Derivation and validation of CHIRP3(M-1) score

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Function in Patients with Non-valvular Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with Different Rhythms Using Real-Time 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Determinants of Left Atrial Thrombus or Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics to Stratify the Risk of Left Atrial/atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

P1360Association between left atrial appendage dysfunction and thromboembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Comparison of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Mechanics in the Risk Stratification of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Machine Learning Model-Based Simple Clinical Information to Predict Decreased Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity

Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics

Influencing factors and predictive model for left atrial appendage emptying velocity in nonvalvular AF patients

Association Betweenleft Atrial Appendage Function Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and the Presence Ofleft Atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract 15625: Left Atrial Appendage Volumetric and Functional Assessment Using Cardiac CT-Derived Three-Dimensional Models

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dispersion Provides Incremental Value for Thromboembolic Risk Stratification over CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Angiography for Stroke Risk Prediction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

542 Non-invasive risk assessment of the left atrial appendage thrombosis using deep learning methods

Nomogram to Predict Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity in Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Parameters Assessed by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Predict Thromboembolic Risk in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Left Atrial Enlargement and Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation As Risk Factors for Left Atrial Thrombus/spontaneous Echo Contrast in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Low CHA2DS2-VASc Score.

Predicting reduced left atrial appendage velocity from echocardiographic left atrial function parameters in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

Predictors of left atrial appendage thrombus in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cardioversion

Left atrial function for predicting atrial fibrillation: a machine learning approach

Risk factors for left atrial thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with low CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score