The Quantification of Bone Mineral Density Using Photon Counting Computed Tomography and its Implications for Detecting Bone Remodelling

Jilmen Quintiens,Walter Coudyzer,Melissa Bevers,Evie Vereecke,Joop P van den Bergh,Sarah L Manske,G Harry van Lenthe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae163
2024-10-04
Abstract:High-Resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) has become standard practice when quantifying volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in vivo. Yet, it is only accessible to peripheral sites, with small fields of view and lengthy scanning times. This limits general applicability in clinical workflows. The goal of this study was to assess the potential of Photon Counting CT (PCCT) in quantitative bone imaging. Using the European Forearm Phantom, PCCT was calibrated to hydroxy-apatite (HA) density. Eight cadaveric forearms were scanned twice with PCCT, and once with HR-pQCT. The dominant forearm of two volunteers was scanned twice with PCCT. In each scan the carpals were delineated. At bone-level, accuracy was assessed with a paired measurement of total vBMD (Tt.vBMD) calculated with PCCT and HR-pQCT. At voxel-level, repeatability was assessed by image registration and voxel-wise subtraction of the ex vivo PCCT scans. In an ideal scenario, this difference would be zero; any deviation was interpreted as falsely detected remodelling. For clinical usage, the least detectable remodelling was determined by finding a threshold in the PCCT difference image that resulted in a classification of bone formation and resorption below acceptable noise levels (<0.5%). The paired measurement of Tt.vBMD had a Pearson correlation of 0.986. Compared to HR-pQCT, PCCT showed a bias of 7.46 mgHA/cm3. At voxel-level, the repeated PCCT scans showed a bias of 17.66 mgHA/cm3 and standard error of 96.23 mgHA/cm3. Least detectable remodelling was found to be 250 mgHA/cm3, for which 0.37% of the voxels was incorrectly classified as newly added or resorbed bone. In vivo, this volume increased to 0.97%. Based on the cadaver data we conclude that PCCT can be used to quantify vBMD and bone turnover. We provided proof of principle that this technique is also accurate in vivo, hence, that it has high potential for clinical applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?