Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance flufenacet

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),Fernando Álvarez,Maria Arena,Domenica Auteri,Sofia Batista Leite,Marco Binaglia,Anna Federica Castoldi,Arianna Chiusolo,Angelo Colagiorgi,Mathilde Colas,Federica Crivellente,Chloe De Lentdecker,Isabella De Magistris,Mark Egsmose,Gabriella Fait,Franco Ferilli,German Giner Santonja,Varvara Gouliarmou,Katrin Halling,Laia Herrero Nogareda,Alessio Ippolito,Frederique Istace,Samira Jarrah,Dimitra Kardassi,Aude Kienzler,Anna Lanzoni,Roberto Lava,Renata Leuschner,Alberto Linguadoca,Jochem Louisse,Christopher Lythgo,Oriol Magrans,Iris Mangas,Galini Mavriou,Andrea Mioč,Ileana Miron,Tunde Molnar,Laura Padovani,Vincenzo Padricello,Martina Panzarea,Juan Manuel Parra Morte,Simone Rizzuto,Anamarija Romac,Agnès Rortais,Miguel Santos,Rositsa Serafimova,Rachel Sharp,Csaba Szentes,Andrea Terron,Anne Theobald,Manuela Tiramani,Giorgia Vianello,Laura Villamar-Bouza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8997
2024-09-27
Abstract:The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Poland and co-rapporteur Member State France for the pesticide active substance flufenacet are reported. In addition, the assessment of the confirmatory data following the Article 12 maximum residue limit (MRL) review of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is also reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of flufenacet as a herbicide on winter cereals. Confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review were assessed. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the assessment of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?