Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for quizalofop-P-ethyl, quizalofop-P-tefuryl and propaquizafop and modification of the existing maximum residue levels for quizalofop-P-tefuryl

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),Giulia Bellisai,Giovanni Bernasconi,Luis Carrasco Cabrera,Irene Castellan,Monica Del Aguila,Lucien Ferreira,German Giner Santonja,Luna Greco,Samira Jarrah,Renata Leuschner,Andrea Mioč,Stefanie Nave,Ragnor Pedersen,Hermine Reich,Silvia Ruocco,Alessia Pia Scarlato,Marta Szot,Anne Theobald,Manuela Tiramani,Alessia Verani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8560
2024-02-26
Abstract:The applicant Arysta Life Science Great Britain Limited submitted a request to the competent national authority in Croatia to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for quizalofop-P-tefuryl in the framework of the maximum residue level (MRL) review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. Since Article 12 data gaps were also set for the two other quizalofop-P variants sharing the same residue definitions for risk assessment and monitoring, EFSA included in the present assessment all quizalofop-P variants: quizalofop-P-ethyl, quizalofop-P-tefuryl and propaquizafop. Moreover, in the application submitted to Croatia, the applicant also included a request to modify the existing MRLs for quizalofop-P-tefuryl in grapes, sunflower seeds and soyabeans in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. To address the data gaps, new data on hydrolysis efficiency of quizalofop-P-tefuryl, quizalofop acid, quizalofop-pentanoic acid and quizalofop-P-glycerate in different matrices of animal origin in accordance with the guidance document SANTE/2020/12830 Rev.1 were submitted, along with a validated analytical method for animal commodities. EFSA concluded that the data gap on validation of the efficiency of the extraction and hydrolysis included in the enforcement method of residues in livestock animal commodities was only fully addressed for muscle, poultry liver and eggs. Regarding plant commodities, the remaining data gaps were not addressed. EFSA also considered data gaps for quizalofop-p-ethyl in caraway as sufficiently addressed in the context of a previous MRL application. In general, the new information provided required a revision of the existing MRLs for several commodities of plant and animal origin. Further risk management considerations are required. Based on the risk assessment results, EFSA concluded that the short-term and long-term intake of residues resulting from the use of quizalofop-P-tefuryl according to the reported agricultural practices is unlikely to present a risk to consumer health.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?