Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorothalonil
European Food Safety Authority,Maria Arena,Domenica Auteri,Stefania Barmaz,Giulia Bellisai,Alba Brancato,Daniela Brocca,Laszlo Bura,Harry Byers,Arianna Chiusolo,Daniele Court Marques,Federica Crivellente,Chloe De Lentdecker,Mark Egsmose,Zoltan Erdos,Gabriella Fait,Lucien Ferreira,Marina Goumenou,Luna Greco,Alessio Ippolito,Frederique Istace,Samira Jarrah,Dimitra Kardassi,Renata Leuschner,Christopher Lythgo,Jose Oriol Magrans,Paula Medina,Ileana Miron,Tunde Molnar,Alexandre Nougadere,Laura Padovani,Juan Manuel Parra Morte,Ragnor Pedersen,Hermine Reich,Angela Sacchi,Miguel Santos,Rositsa Serafimova,Rachel Sharp,Alois Stanek,Franz Streissl,Juergen Sturma,Csaba Szentes,Jose Tarazona,Andrea Terron,Anne Theobald,Benedicte Vagenende,Alessia Verani,Laura Villamar‐Bouza,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5126
2018-01-01
EFSA Journal
Abstract:The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, and co-rapporteur Member State, Belgium, for the pesticide active substance chlorothalonil are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of chlorothalonil as a fungicide on wheat, barley, tomato and potato. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
food science & technology