REDUCED EXPRESSION OF INTERLEUKIN-2 RECEPTORS IN HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINAEMIA: A POSSIBLE CAUSE OF HIGHER CANCER INCIDENCE

M. Malkovsky,M. Jira,L. Gao,B. Loveland,V. Malkovska,A. Dalgleish,A. Webster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91586-2

IF: 202.731

1986-06-21

The Lancet

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effectiveness of a Short-Term Multimodal Prehabilitation Program in Adult Patients Awaiting Selective Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for an Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Wen Gao,Hongyan Li,Yuaner Chen,Yuping Zhang,Mao Zhang,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1201737

IF: 3.6

2023-01-01

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Abstract:Background:Prehabilitation has been demonstrated to positively impact postoperative recovery in patients undergoing selective cardiac surgery. However, the optimal modules included in prehabilitation programs are yet to be fully explored, as existing studies have primarily focused on exercise. This study will explore the effectiveness of a three-arm prehabilitation program among adult patients awaiting selective cardiac surgery.Methods and analysis:A single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU). A total of 152 adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular surgery) will be recruited from a tertiary teaching hospital. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group or the prehabilitation group. Patients assigned to the control group will receive standard care, which includes patient education and counseling as well as personal guidance on exercise, breathing, and coughing. Patients in the intervention group will be provided a multimodal prehabilitation program, including nutrition guidance, a diet journal, mindfulness training, and exercise guidance. The interventions will begin with home-based training and continue after hospital admission and before surgery. The primary outcome will be the perioperative 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD). The secondary outcomes will include preoperative readiness, postoperative recovery, and patient experience with the program.Discussion:The purpose of the study is to examine whether a short-term multimodal prehabilitation program will be associated with improved preoperative readiness and postoperative outcomes. The findings of this study will provide evidence to support the development of a perioperative program aimed at enhancing patient recovery.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT05503004.
Implementation of the pre-operative rehabilitation recovery protocol and its effect on the quality of recovery after colorectal surgeries

Li-Hua Peng,Wen-Jian Wang,Jing Chen,Ju-Ying Jin,Su Min,Pei-Pei Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001709

IF: 6.133

2021-11-03

Chinese Medical Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patients' recovery after surgery is the major concern for all perioperative clinicians. This study aims to minimize the side effects of peri-operative surgical stress and accelerate patients' recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function and quality of life after colorectal surgeries, an enhanced recovery protocol based on pre-operative rehabilitation was implemented and its effect was explored.METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted, patients were recruited from January 2018 to September 2019 in this study. Patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgeries were randomly allocated to receive either standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (S-ERAS) group or enhanced recovery after surgery based on pre-operative rehabilitation (group PR-ERAS). In the group PR-ERAS, on top of recommended peri-operative strategies for enhanced recovery, formatted rehabilitation exercises pre-operatively were carried out. The primary outcome was the quality of GI recovery measured with I-FEED scoring. Secondary outcomes were quality of life scores and strength of handgrip; the incidence of adverse events till 30 days post-operatively was also analyzed.RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were scrutinized and 213 eligible patients were enrolled, who were randomly allocated to the group S-ERAS (n = 104) and group PR-ERAS (n = 109). The percentage of normal recovery graded by I-FEED scoring was higher in group PR-ERAS (79.0% vs. 64.3%, P < 0.050). The subscores of life ability and physical well-being at post-operative 72 h were significantly improved in the group PR-ERAS using quality of recovery score (QOR-40) questionnaire (P < 0.050). The strength of hand grip post-operatively was also improved in the group PR-ERAS (P < 0.050). The incidence of bowel-related and other adverse events was similar in both groups till 30 days post-operatively (P > 0.050).CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative rehabilitation exercise might be another benevolent factor for early recovery of GI function and life of quality after colorectal surgery. Newer, more surgery-specific rehabilitation recovery protocol merits further exploration for these patients.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-ONRC-14005096.

medicine, general & internal
Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Federica Gonella,Paolo Massucco,Serena Perotti,Stefano Gianolio,Daniela Vassallo,Serena Monasterolo,Antonella Laezza,Beatrice De Zolt Ponte,Andrea Ricotti,Alessandro Ferrero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108688

2024-09-12

Abstract:Background: Prehabilitation (Prehab) programs aim to optimize patients psycho-physical condition before surgery, to improve post-operative outcomes. Although functional benefits of Prehab are known, the clinical impact does not yet have concrete evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prehab, associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and surgical rehabilitation (Rehab), in frail colorectal oncological patients in terms of morbidity and hospitalization. Patients and methods: The cohort of patients undergoing Prehab between January 2020 and December 2022 (Prehab group) is compared with the historical cohort of patients operated on in the period 01/2018-12/2019, not undergoing Prehab (no-Prehab group). Prehab scheme: multimodal (physiotherapy, clinical nutrition and psychological support). All patients followed an ERAS path. Only Prehab patients followed a surgical Rehab by a dedicated nurse case-manager. Propensity score matching (PSM) and weighting (PSW) analyses were used for statistical analysis. Primary objectives: complications at 30 days and hospital stay. Secondary objectives: functional outcomes. Results: In 3 years of preliminary enrollment, 36 patients completed the program: 22 in person, 16 in tele-prehab. The Prehab group experienced fewer complications than the no-Prehab group (PSM: 31 % vs 53 % p = 0.02; PSW: 31 % vs 51 % p = 0.02), less severe complications (CCI>20 PSM: 17 % vs 33 % p = 0.074; PSW: 17 % vs 53 % 0.026) and shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs 6 days; p = 0.02). Finally, prehabilitated patients improved their preoperative functional capacity and reduced anxiety levels. Conclusion: The strategy of combining Prehab with ERAS and Rehab has positively influenced post-operative clinical outcomes as well as functional parameters in our series.
Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Resection Surgery: a Single Center Experience

Yuan Ding,Zhenzhen Gao,Zhongquan Sun,Qiyi Zhang,Bo Zhou,Zhiwei Li,Wenyan Zhang,Yuancong Jiang,Xiangying Zhang,Guomei Ge,Matteo Ravaioli,Chris Jones,Sheng Yan,Weilin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2018.08.30

2018-01-01

Translational Cancer Research

Abstract:Background: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program promotes postoperative recovery. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of the ERAS protocol in hepatectomy. Methods: The primary outcomes included time to first flatus and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included time to first passage of stool, time to off-bed activity, pain score, abdominal distension score, postoperative liver function and complications. Outcomes were evaluated between the ERAS group (n=69) and the control group (n=232). A subanalysis of probiotics use in the ERAS group was also performed. Results: In patients undergoing laparoscopic and open hepatectomy, time to first flatus after surgery was significantly shorter, as well as LOS, in the ERAS group. Lower incidence of post-operative complications was noted in ERAS group. While sub-analysis of probiotics group showed no significance in the primary outcomes. Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hepatectomy could significantly promote postoperative recovery. Short-term application of probiotics during the perioperative period did not improve the outcomes in the ERAS group.
Reversible Neuromuscular Syndrome in Malnourished Children

D. Donley,B. Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04076.x

1989-12-01

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract:Six young children are reported who were malnourished, with hypotonia, weakness and absent stretch reflexes, both proximally and distally, but with normal sensory examinations. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities also were normal. Five had mildly abnormal electromyograms, with scattered fibrillations, positive sharp waves and increased insertional activity, both proximally and distally. After adequate nutrition in hospital, all the children's reflexes returned and strength improved. Weight for height was an important indicator: it was decreased when the muscle stretch reflexes were absent and increased when they returned. The neurological and electrodiagnostic findings imply that this is a reversible lower motor‐neuron or muscle disorder.
Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation for Frail Patients

Francesco Carli,Guillaume Bousquet-Dion,Julio F. Fiore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1816

2020-09-01

JAMA Surgery

Abstract:In Reply We appreciate the opportunity to reply to the comments regarding our article<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#slr200012r1">1</a> on prehabilitation for frail patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. These comments reflect a growing and enthusiastic interest in improving the quality of surgical care using prehabilitation.Despite semantic differences in the description of study aims between our protocol and the article published in JAMA Surgery,<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#slr200012r1">1</a> our trial was clearly intended to be a confirmatory superiority trial and was powered as such. The effect size used for power calculation was based on a study<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#slr200012r2">2</a> from the developers of the Comprehensive Complication Index supporting that trials measuring Comprehensive Complication Index should target a between-group differences of 10 points because this reflects a meaningful difference of 1 grade in the Clavien-Dindo classification.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#slr200012r2">2</a> The literature does not support that this effect size is overoptimistic or unrealistic. As with any single-center trial, our results are only generalizable to contexts of care that are similar to our study setting. We would like to reiterate that the enhanced recovery pathway and high prevalence of laparoscopic surgery at our center may have contributed to attenuating surgical stress, thus minimizing the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes. To increase generalizability of findings, we agree that a multicenter randomized trial with a clustered design is an interesting venue for future prehabilitation research. We do not agree that the quality control of our trial was questionable owing to patients' potential cognitive decline because we excluded patients with neurological and mental comorbidities that could impair exercise and fitness assessments.

surgery
Mid-term echocardiographic results with different rings following restrictive mitral annuloplasty for ischaemic cardiomiopathy.

F. Onorati,A. Rubino,D. Marturano,E. Pasceri,G. Mascaro,S. Zinzi,F. Serraino,A. Renzulli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.051

IF: 4.534

2009-08-01

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:
Effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yinning Guo,Lingyu Ding,Xueyi Miao,Xiaoman Jiang,Ting Xu,Xinyi Xu,Shuqin Zhu,Qin Xu,Jieman Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07541-1

2022-12-19

Abstract:Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analys is aimed to explore the effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and other databases from database inception to 15 March 2022. Studies were included if they consisted of a prehabilitation intervention in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. Results: A total of 9 studies encompassing 1313 patients were included in the review. Through meta-analysis, prehabilitation has a positive impact on total complications (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.94, P = 0.004), severe complications (RR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.90, P = 0.01), and the average length of hospital stay (MD = - 1.36, 95% CI = - 2.38 to - 0.35, P = 0.008). But it had no differences in 30-day and 3-month mortality and 30-day and 3-month readmission rates. Through qualitative synthesis, two studies found that prehabilitation had a favorable tendency to promote functional recovery compared with the control group. Conclusion: Prehabilitation had a positive effect on postoperative complications and the average length of hospital stay in frail cancer patients. A personalized and supervised multimodal prehabilitation program with exercise at its core may be more beneficial for them. More studies with extensive follow-up are needed to confirm and update the findings of these results.
Preoperative Rehabilitation Is Feasible in the Weeks Prior to Surgery and Significantly Improves Functional Performance

D E Hall,A Youk,K Allsup,K Kennedy,T D Byard,R Dhupar,D Chu,A M Rahman,M Wilson,L P Cahalin,J Afilalo,D E Forman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2022.42

Abstract:Background: Frailty is a multidimensional state of increased vulnerability. Frail patients are at increased risk for poor surgical outcomes. Prior research demonstrates that rehabilitation strategies deployed after surgery improve outcomes by building strength. Objectives: Examine the feasibility and impact of a novel, multi-faceted prehabilitation intervention for frail patients before surgery. Design: Single arm clinical trial. Setting: Veterans Affairs hospital. Participants: Patients preparing for major abdominal, urological, thoracic, or cardiac surgery with frailty identified as a Risk Analysis Index≥30. Intervention: Prehabilitation started in a supervised setting to establish safety and then transitioned to home-based exercise with weekly telephone coaching by exercise physiologists. Prehabilitation included (a)strength and coordination training; (b)respiratory muscle training (IMT); (c)aerobic conditioning; and (d)nutritional coaching and supplementation. Prehabilitation length was tailored to the 4-6 week time lag typically preceding each participant's normally scheduled surgery. Measurements: Functional performance and patient surveys were assessed at baseline, every other week during prehabilitation, and then 30 and 90 days after surgery. Within-person changes were estimated using linear mixed models. Results: 43 patients completed baseline assessments; 36(84%) completed a median 5(range 3-10) weeks of prehabilitation before surgery; 32(74%) were retained through 90-day follow-up. Baseline function was relatively low. Exercise logs show participants completed 94% of supervised exercise, 78% of prescribed IMT and 74% of home-based exercise. Between baseline and day of surgery, timed-up-and-go decreased 2.3 seconds, gait speed increased 0.1 meters/second, six-minute walk test increased 41.7 meters, and the time to complete 5 chair rises decreased 1.6 seconds(all P≤0.007). Maximum and mean inspiratory and expiratory pressures increased 4.5, 7.3, 14.1 and 13.5 centimeters of water, respectively(all P≤0.041). Conclusions: Prehabilitation is feasible before major surgery and achieves clinically meaningful improvements in functional performance that may impact postoperative outcomes and recovery. These data support rationale for a larger trial powered to detect differences in postoperative outcomes.
Effect of short-term prehabilitation of older patients with colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Xiayun Wang,Ruizhe Chen,Lili Ge,Yifan Gu,Lin Zhang,Li Wang,Chengle Zhuang,Qian Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1076835

IF: 4.7

2023-02-16

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to assess the impact of short-term, hospital-based, supervised multimodal prehabilitation on elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Methods A single-center, retrospective study was conducted from October 2020 to December 2021, which included a total of 587 CRC patients who were scheduled to undergo radical resection. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed to reduce selection bias. All patients were treated within a standardized enhanced recovery pathway, and patients in the prehabilitation group received an additional supervised, short-term multimodal preoperative prehabilitation intervention. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Among the participants, 62 patients were excluded; 95 participants were included in the prehabilitation group and 430 in the non-prehabilitation group. After PSM analysis, 95 pairs of well-matched patients were included in the comparative study. Participants in the prehabilitation group had better preoperative functional capacity (402.78 m vs. 390.09 m, P<0.001), preoperative anxiety status (9% vs. 28%, P<0.001), time to first ambulation[25.0(8.0) hours vs. 28.0(12.4) hours, P=0.008], time to first flatus [39.0(22.0) hours vs. 47.7(34.0) hours, P=0.006], duration of the postoperative length of hospital stay [8.0(3.0) days vs. 10.0(5.0) days, P=0.007), and quality of life in terms of psychological dimensions at 1 month postoperatively [53.0(8.0) vs. 49.0(5.0), P<0.001]. Conclusion The short-term, hospital-based, supervised multimodal prehabilitation is feasible with a high degree of compliance in older CRC patients, which improves their short-term clinical outcomes.

oncology
Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JiaJun Zhang,YuRu Hu,HuiLi Deng,ZhongMou Huang,JianMei Huang,Qu Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241235590

2024-03-07

Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract:Integrative Cancer Therapies, Volume 23, Issue , January-December 2024. Background:The surgical intervention serves as the paramount and prevalent remedy for individuals afflicted with colorectal malignancies, with the significance of perioperative stewardship and convalescence being indisputable. Prehabilitation coupled with preoperative lifestyle modulation has demonstrated efficacy in patients subjected to certain classifications of abdominal procedures. However, the evidence pertaining to its impact on those battling colorectal cancer remains equivocal.Methods:A meta-analysis, grounded in pairwise contrast, of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was orchestrated, coupled with a systematic review, to probe the efficacy of preoperative lifestyle modulation and prehabilitation on patients' postoperative functionality and recuperation. An exhaustive exploration of 8 electronic databases and trial registries was undertaken to encompass all pertinent RCTs disseminated in English or Chinese from January 2012 through December 2022. Employing a random-effects model, we evaluated parameters such as the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT), complications, quality of life (QoL), aggregate and postoperative duration of hospitalization (tLHS and postLHS), and healthcare expenditure (HExp) for postoperative patients.Results:A total of 28 RCTs were incorporated into the systematic review and meta-analysis. Relative to conventional preoperative care, rehabilitation or preoperative lifestyle management was found to enhance postoperative 6MWT (SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.29) and diminish the complication rate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.69). Nonetheless, no significant discrepancies were observed in QoL (SMD 1.81, 95% CI −0.26 to 3.87), tLHS (SMD −0.26, 95% CI −0.68 to 0.15), and postLHS (SMD −1.46, 95% CI −3.12 to 0.20) between the groups. HExp could not be evaluated due to a lack of sufficient data for synthesis. Most pooled outcomes exhibited significant heterogeneity, urging a cautious interpretation. Subgroup analysis revealed that nutritional interventions could mitigate the incidence of complications, and preoperative exercise could improve tLHS and postLHS. A combined approach of physical, nutritional, and psychological intervention or prehabilitation proved superior to any single intervention in enhancing postoperative capabilities.Conclusion:This meta-analysis delineated the efficacy of preoperative interventions on postoperative capabilities in patients with colorectal cancer, thereby offering evidence for clinical practice. It was concluded that preoperative interventions are unequivocally beneficial for postoperative functional recovery and the reduction of complication rates in patients with colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, the acquisition of more high-level evidence is still necessitated to further ascertain the effectiveness of this strategy for other patient groups and to establish its best practices. The heterogeneity in the pooled outcomes underlines the need for future studies to be more uniform in their design and reporting, which would facilitate more robust and reliable meta-analyses.

oncology,integrative & complementary medicine
The impact of frailty on clinical outcomes of older patients undergoing enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective cohort study

Shuai-Kang Wang,Qi-Jun Wang,Peng Wang,Xiang-Yu Li,Peng Cui,Dong-Fan Wang,Xiao-Long Chen,Chao Kong,Shi-Bao Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001594

2024-08-01

Abstract:Background: Frailty is recognized as a surrogate for physiological age and has been established as a valid and independent predictor of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can enhance surgical safety by minimizing stress responses in frail patients, enabling surgeons to discharge patients earlier. However, the question of whether and to what extent the frailty impacts the post-ERAS outcomes in older patients remains. Materials and methods: An evidence-based ERAS program was implemented in our center from January 2019. This is a prospective cohort study of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spine disease from April 2019 to October 2021. Frailty was assessed with the Fried frailty scale (FP scale), and patients were categorized as non/prefrail (FP 0-2) or frail (FP ≥ 3). The preoperative variables, operative data, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up information were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for 90-day major complications and prolonged length of hospital stay after surgery. Results: A total of 245 patients (age of 79.8±3.4 year) who had a preoperative FP score recorded and underwent scheduled TLIF surgery were included in the final analysis. Comparisons between nonfrail and prefrail/frail patients revealed no significant difference in age, sex, and surgery-related variables. Even after adjusting for multiple comparisons, the association between Fried frailty and ADL-dependency, IADL-dependency, and malnutrition remained significant. Preoperative frailty was associated with increased rates of postoperative adverse events. A higher CCI grade was an independent predictor for 90-day major complications, while Fried frailty and MNA-SF scores <12 were predictive of poor postoperative recovery. Conclusion: Frail older patients had more adverse post-ERAS outcomes after TLIF compared to non/prefrail older patients. Continued research and multidisciplinary collaboration will be essential to refine and optimize protocols for surgical care in frail older adults.
Going the distance. New pain treatment provide longer stronger relief.

Y. D'arcy

2007-06-01

Abstract:
Trimodal prehabilitation for colorectal surgery attenuates post-surgical losses in lean body mass: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chelsia Gillis,Tanis R Fenton,Tolulope T Sajobi,Enrico Maria Minnella,Rashami Awasthi,Sarah-Ève Loiselle,A Sender Liberman,Barry Stein,Patrick Charlebois,Francesco Carli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.982

Abstract:Background & aims: Preservation of lean body mass is an important cancer care objective. The capacity for prehabilitation interventions to modulate the lean body mass (LBM) of colorectal cancer patients before and after surgery is unknown. Methods: A pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials of trimodal prehabilitation vs. trimodal rehabilitation at a single university-affiliated tertiary center employing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care was conducted. The prehabilitation interventions included exercise, nutrition, and anxiety-reduction elements that began approximately four weeks before surgery and continued for eight weeks after surgery. The rehabilitation interventions were identical to the prehabilitation interventions but were initiated only after surgery. Body composition, measured using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, was recorded at baseline, pre-surgery, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was change in LBM before and after colorectal surgery for cancer. A mixed effects regression model was used to estimate changes in body mass and body composition over time controlling for age, sex, baseline body mass index (BMI), baseline six-minute walk test (6MWT), and postoperative compliance to the interventions. NCT02586701 &NCT01356264. Results: Pooled data included 76 patients who followed prehabilitation and 63 patients who followed rehabilitation (n = 139). Neither group experienced changes in preoperative LBM. Compared to rehabilitated patients, prehabilitated patients had significantly more absolute and relative LBM at four and eight-weeks post-surgery in models controlling for age, sex, baseline BMI, baseline 6MWT, and compliance to the postoperative intervention. Conclusion: Trimodal prehabilitation attenuated the post-surgical LBM loss compared to the loss observed in patients who received the rehabilitation intervention. Patients who receive neither intervention (i.e., standard of care) would be likely to lose more LBM. Offering a prehabilitation program to colorectal cancer patients awaiting resection is a useful strategy to mitigate the impact of the surgical stress response on lean tissue in an ERAS setting, and, in turn, might have a positive impact on the cancer care course. Clinical trial registration: NCT02586701 &NCT01356264 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Prognostic impact of a 3-week multimodal prehabilitation program on frail elderly patients undergoing elective gastric cancer surgery: a randomized trial

Jianhui Chen,Chen Hong,Rui Chen,Mengya Zhou,Senbin Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03490-7

2024-11-13

BMC Gastroenterology

Abstract:Research indicates that prehabilitation is effective in optimizing physical status before surgery, although this method may be considered "aggressive" for frail elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether multimodal prehabilitation decreases postoperative complications and improves functional recovery in frail elderly patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery, in comparison to usual clinical care.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled study of a preoperative rehabilitation bundle in the frail and elderly undergoing abdominal surgery

Hairil Rizal Abdullah,Victoria Peixin Lien,Hwee Kuan Ong,Pei Ling Er,Ying Hao,Shariq Ali Khan,Christopher Weiyang Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016815

IF: 3.006

2017-08-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Frail patients have decreased physiological reserves and consequently, they are unable to recover as quickly from surgery. Frailty, as an entity, is a risk factor of increased morbidity and mortality. It is also associated with a longer time to discharge. This trial is undertaken to determine if a novel prehabilitation protocol (10-day bundle of interventions—physiotherapy, nutritional supplementation and cognitive training) can reduce the postoperative length of stay of frail patients who are undergoing elective abdominal surgery, compared with standard care. Methods and analysis This is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms. 62 patients who are frail and undergoing elective abdominal surgery will be recruited and randomised to receive either a novel prehabilitation protocol or standard care. Participants will receive telephone reminders preoperatively to encourage protocol compliance. Data will be collected for up to 30 days postoperatively. The primary outcome of the trial will be the postoperative length of stay and the secondary outcomes are the postoperative complications and functional recovery during the hospital admission. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Singapore General Hospital Institutional Review Board (CIRB Ref: 2016/2584). The study is also listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial number: NCT02921932 ). All participants will sign an informed consent form before randomisation and translators will be made available to non-English speaking patients. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as national and international conferences. The data collected will also be made available in a public data repository. Trial registration number NCT02921932 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

medicine, general & internal
Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Roberto Falz,Christian Bischoff,René Thieme,Johannes Lässing,Matthias Mehdorn,Sigmar Stelzner,Martin Busse,Ines Gockel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w

2022-06-13

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Functional capacity is an independent indicator of morbidity in colon and rectal cancer surgery. This systematic review describes the evaluated and synthesized effects of exercise prehabilitation depending on the duration of interventions on functional and postoperative outcomes in colon and rectal cancer surgery. Methods Three electronic databases (MEDLINE Pubmed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Registry) were systematically searched (January 2022) for controlled trials that investigated the effects of prehabilitation prior to colo-rectal cancer resection. Results Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review and 14 in our meta-analyses assessing these outcomes: the 6 min walk distance (6MWD), postoperative overall complications, and length of stay (LOS). We observed a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity as measured with 6MWD (mean difference: 30.8 m; 95% CI 13.3, 48.3; p = 0.0005) due to prehabilitation. No reductions in LOS (mean difference: – 0.27 days; 95% CI – 0.93, 0.40; p = 0.5) or postoperative overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.84; 95% CI 0.53, 1.31; p = 0.44) were observed. Prehabilitation lasting more than 3 weeks tended to lower overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI 0.4, 1.1; p = 0.11). However, the prehabilitation time periods differed between colon and rectal carcinoma resections. Conclusion Prehabilitation while the patient is preparing to undergo surgery for colorectal carcinoma improves functional capacity; and might reduce postoperative overall complications, but does not shorten the LOS. The studies we reviewed differ in target variables, design, and the intervention’s time period. Multicenter studies with sufficient statistical power and differentiating between colon and rectal carcinoma are needed to develop implementation strategies in the health care system. Registration PROSPERO CRD42022310532

oncology
The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pavel Skořepa,Katherine L. Ford,Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Dominic O’Connor,Carla M. Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N. Lobo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.020

IF: 7.643

2024-01-24

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:Summary Background and aims Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes. Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥Grade 3) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software. Results Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0-78.4) years. Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one. Meta-analysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference -1.07 days, 95%CI -1.60 to -0.53 days, P<0.0001, I 2 =19%). Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44% (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.82, P<0.004, I 2 =51%). Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT. The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95%CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P<0.00001, I 2 =24%), favouring prehabilitation. Conclusion Given the significant impact on shortening length of stay and reducing severe complications, prehabilitation should be encouraged in frail, older and high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

nutrition & dietetics
Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study

Jamie L Waterland,Hilmy Ismail,Catherine L Granger,Cameron Patrick,Linda Denehy,Bernhard Riedel,Centre for Prehabilitation and Perioperative Care,Anna Beaumont,Emma Bruns,Kate Burbury,Danika Carty,Rani Chahal,Georgina Christelis,Sonia Coleman,Jessica Crowe,Lara Edbrooke,Melanie Fairweather,Maria Ftanou,Kate Graham,Travis Hall,Simon Harrison,Alexander Heriot,Yesim Karabiyik,Kay Kenchington,Amit Khot,Erika Kotowicz,Naomi Lawrance,Debra Leung,Iris Liu,Jenelle Loeliger,Fiona Lynch,Alicia Martin,Jamie Norman,Kat O'Brien,Tom Poulton,Christina Prickett,Ian Richardson,Catherine Sinton,Amanda Siu,Emily Traer,Anya Traill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-022-00263-2

2022-08-23

Abstract:Background: Patients presenting for major surgery with low cardiorespiratory fitness (deconditioning) and other modifiable risk factors are at increased risk of postoperative complications. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Eligible patients in this single-center cohort study included patients with poor fitness (objectively assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CPET) scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients were recruited to participate in a prehabilitation program that spanned up to 6 weeks pre-operatively and comprised aerobic and resistance exercise training, breathing exercise, and nutritional support. The primary outcome assessed pre-specified feasibility targets: recruitment >70%, retention >85%, and intervention adherence >70%. Secondary outcomes were assessed for improved pre-operative functional status and health-related quality of life and for postoperative complications. Results: Eighty-two (34%) out of 238 patients screened between April 2018 and December 2019 were eligible for recruitment. Fifty (61%) patients (52% males) with a median age of 71 (IQR, 63-77) years participated in the study. Baseline oxygen consumption the at anaerobic threshold and at peak exercise (mean±SD: 9.8±1.8 and 14.0±2.9 mL/kg/min, respectively) confirmed the deconditioned state of the study cohort. The retention rate within the prehabilitation program was 84%, with 42 participants returning for repeat CPET testing. While >60% of participants preferred to do home-based prehabilitation, adherence to the intervention was low-with only 12 (28%) and 15 (35%) of patients having self-reported compliance >70% with their exercise prescriptions. Conclusion: Our prehabilitation program in high-risk cancer surgery patients did not achieve pre-specified targets for recruitment, retention, and self-reported program adherence. These findings underpin the importance of implementation research and strategies for the prehabilitation programs in major surgery. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620000073909 ) retrospectively registered.
Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jamie L Waterland,Orla McCourt,Lara Edbrooke,Catherine L Granger,Hilmy Ismail,Bernhard Riedel,Linda Denehy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.628848

2021-03-19

Abstract:Objectives: This systematic review set out to identify, evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE 1946-2020, EMBASE 1947-2020, CINAHL 1937-2020, PEDro 1999-2020, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials 1991-2020) were systematically searched (until August 2020) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of prehabilitation interventions in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. This review included any form of prehabilitation either unimodal or multimodal that included whole body and/or respiratory exercises as a stand-alone intervention or in addition to other prehabilitation interventions (such as nutrition and psychology) compared to standard care. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 21 studies in the meta-analysis. There was moderate quality of evidence that multimodal prehabilitation improves pre-operative functional capacity as measured by 6 min walk distance (Mean difference [MD] 33.09 metres, 95% CI 17.69-48.50; p = <0.01) but improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness such as preoperative oxygen consumption at peak exercise (VO2 peak; MD 1.74 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.03-3.50; p = 0.05) and anaerobic threshold (AT; MD 1.21 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.34-2.76; p = 0.13) were not significant. A reduction in hospital length of stay (MD 3.68 days, 95% CI 0.92-6.44; p = 0.009) was observed but no effect was observed for postoperative complications (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.18; p = 0.27), pulmonary complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01; p = 0.05), hospital re-admission (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.90; p = 0.81) or postoperative mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.09, p = 0.90). Conclusion: Multimodal prehabilitation improves preoperative functional capacity with reduction in hospital length of stay. This supports the need for ongoing research on innovative cost-effective prehabilitation approaches, research within large multicentre studies to verify this effect and to explore implementation strategies within clinical practise.

REDUCED EXPRESSION OF INTERLEUKIN-2 RECEPTORS IN HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINAEMIA: A POSSIBLE CAUSE OF HIGHER CANCER INCIDENCE

Effectiveness of a Short-Term Multimodal Prehabilitation Program in Adult Patients Awaiting Selective Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for an Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Implementation of the pre-operative rehabilitation recovery protocol and its effect on the quality of recovery after colorectal surgeries

Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Resection Surgery: a Single Center Experience

Reversible Neuromuscular Syndrome in Malnourished Children

Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation for Frail Patients

Mid-term echocardiographic results with different rings following restrictive mitral annuloplasty for ischaemic cardiomiopathy.

Effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Preoperative Rehabilitation Is Feasible in the Weeks Prior to Surgery and Significantly Improves Functional Performance

Effect of short-term prehabilitation of older patients with colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The impact of frailty on clinical outcomes of older patients undergoing enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective cohort study

Going the distance. New pain treatment provide longer stronger relief.

Trimodal prehabilitation for colorectal surgery attenuates post-surgical losses in lean body mass: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials

Prognostic impact of a 3-week multimodal prehabilitation program on frail elderly patients undergoing elective gastric cancer surgery: a randomized trial

Protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled study of a preoperative rehabilitation bundle in the frail and elderly undergoing abdominal surgery

Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study

Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis