A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials on the role of prehabilitation programs in colorectal surgery
Zoe Garoufalia,Sameh Hany Emile,Sarinya Meknarit,Rachel Gefen,Nir Horesh,Peige Zhou,Pauline Aeschbacher,Victor Strassmann,Steven D. Wexner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.009
IF: 4.348
2024-08-18
Surgery
Abstract:Background Prehabilitation is gaining popularity in colorectal surgery but lacks high-quality postoperative outcomes data. This meta-analysis explored whether prehabilitation impacts postoperative outcomes. Methods In this meta-analysis, compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched PubMed and Scopus through November 2022. High-quality randomized control trials involving adults who underwent colorectal surgery with/without exercise-based prehabilitation were included. The main outcomes were short-term postoperative morbidity, readmissions, and length of stay. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results Seven high-quality randomized control trials comprising 1,225 patients were included. The median prehabilitation duration was 4 (2–4) weeks. Four studies compared prehabilitation and standard of care, and 3 compared prehabilitation and rehabilitation. Exercise-based prehabilitation did not reduce the odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.27–1.40, P = .25, I 2 = 68%) or readmission (odds ratio 1, 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.46, P = .85, I 2 = 0%). The prehabilitation group had shorter length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference –0.2, 95% confidence interval –0.25 to –0.14, P < .0001, I 2 = 43.3%). Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.56–1.89, P = .91, I 2 = 33%), length of stay (weighted mean difference –0.16, 95% confidence interval –0.47 to 0.16, P = .33, I 2 = 59%), and readmission (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.28–5.56, P = .77, I 2 = 52%). The only benefit of prehabilitation over rehabilitation was better 6-minute walking distance test results at time of surgery (weighted mean difference: –9.4 m; 95% confidence interval –18.04 to 0.79, P = .03, I 2 = 42%). Conclusion Prehabilitation provided decreased postoperative length of hospital stay and improved preoperative functional outcomes, but not reduced odds of complications and/or readmissions. Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar clinical outcomes.
surgery