A Comprehensive Review on Rationale, Methodology, and Measures of Effectiveness

Carlos E. Guerra-Londono,Juan P. Cata,Katherine Nowak,Vijaya Gottumukkala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040162
2024-04-10
Current Oncology
Abstract:Cancer surgery places a significant burden on a patients' functional status and quality of life. In addition, cancer surgery is fraught with postoperative complications, themselves influenced by a patient's functional status. Prehabilitation is a unimodal or multimodal strategy that aims to increase a patient's functional capacity to reduce postoperative complications and improve postoperative recovery and quality of life. In most cases, it involves exercise, nutrition, and anxiety-reducing interventions. The impact of prehabilitation has been explored in several types of cancer surgery, most commonly colorectal and thoracic. Overall, the existing evidence suggests prehabilitation improves physiological outcomes (e.g., lean body mass, maximal oxygen consumption) as well as clinical outcomes (e.g., postoperative complications, quality of life). Notably, the benefit of prehabilitation is additional to that of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. While safe, prehabilitation programs require multidisciplinary coordination preoperatively. Despite the existence of numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the certainty of evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of prehabilitation is low to moderate, principally due to significant methodological heterogeneity and small sample sizes. There is a need for more large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials to draw strong clinical recommendations.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that cancer surgery patients improve their functional status through prehabilitation strategies before surgery, in order to reduce postoperative complications, accelerate the recovery speed and improve the quality of life. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects: 1. **Theoretical basis of prehabilitation**: Why is prehabilitation carried out before cancer surgery? This includes how prehabilitation affects postoperative outcomes by improving the patient's physiological and psychological states. 2. **Specific strategies of prehabilitation**: What prehabilitation strategies are used in cancer surgery patients? These strategies usually include exercise training (such as high - intensity interval training, resistance training), nutritional support (such as nutritional counseling and supplementation), psychosocial intervention (such as anxiety - reduction techniques, cognitive training) and functional training (such as respiratory muscle training). 3. **Evaluation methods of prehabilitation effects**: How to measure the effects of prehabilitation strategies? Commonly used evaluation indicators in research include maximal oxygen uptake (VO\(_{2}\)max), 6 - minute walk test (6MWT), grip strength test, patient - generated subjective global assessment (PG - SGA), serum albumin level, maximal inspiratory pressure, etc. 4. **Effective duration of prehabilitation**: What is the recommended effective duration of the prehabilitation program? This involves the implementation cycle and frequency of the prehabilitation program to ensure that patients can obtain the greatest benefits before surgery. In summary, this paper aims to comprehensively review and analyze the theoretical basis, specific strategies, effect evaluation methods and effective duration of prehabilitation in cancer surgery patients, and provide guidance for clinicians and researchers to implement or study prehabilitation.