Der Anteil der einzelnen Zellarten an dem Holz der Rotbuche

H. Schulz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02605772

1957-03-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Cerebrospinal fluid turnover and convexity block in mental impairment. A controlled prospective study.

U. Lying-tunell

IF: 9.9

Neurology

Abstract:A prospective study with a 3-year follow-up was made of 82 patients examined consecutively by pneumoencephalography. Several types of cerebral diseases were represented. The degree of mental impairment was rated. Qauntitative cisternography was performed in 70 of these patients, in which the exponential elimination of injected iodine 131-l human serum albumin from the basal cisterns was calculated. Mental impairment was found to be strongly correlated with a lack of air filling over the parietal convexities and with a slow isotope elimination from the basal cisterns, indicating a slow cerebrospinal fluid turnover. Hydrocephalus was not always present. Only eight had a convexity block for the passage of isotopes.
Prehabilitation programs for individuals with cancer: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials

Jose F. Meneses-Echavez,Andrés F. Loaiza-Betancur,Víctor Díaz-López,Andrés M. Echavarría-Rodríguez,Héctor Reynaldo Triana-Reina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02373-4

2023-11-17

Systematic Reviews

Abstract:Abstract Background Prehabilitation programs focusing on exercise training as the main component are known as a promising alternative for improving patients’ outcomes before cancer surgery. This systematic review determined the benefits and harms of prehabilitation programs compared with usual care for individuals with cancer. Methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to June 2022, and hand searched clinical trial registries. We included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, survivors of any type of cancer, that compared prehabilitation programs that had exercise training as the major component with usual care or other active interventions. Outcome measures were health-related quality of life (HRQL), muscular strength, postoperative complications, average length of stay (ALOS), handgrip strength, and physical activity levels. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. Results Twenty-five RCTs (2682 participants) published between 2010 and 2022 met our inclusion criteria. Colorectal and lung cancers were the most common diagnoses. The studies had methodological concerns regarding outcome measurement, selective reporting, and attrition. Five prehabilitation programs were compared to usual care (rehabilitation): combined training, aerobic training, respiratory muscle training plus aerobic training, respiratory muscle training plus resistance training, and pelvic floor training. The studies provided no clear evidence of an effect between groups. We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence as very low, downgraded due to serious study limitations and imprecision. Conclusion Prehabilitation programs focusing on exercise training may have an effect on adults with cancer, but the evidence is very uncertain. We have very little confidence in the results and the true effect is likely to be substantially different from these. Further research is needed before we can draw a more certain conclusion. Systematic review registration CRD42019125658.

medicine, general & internal
Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jamie L Waterland,Orla McCourt,Lara Edbrooke,Catherine L Granger,Hilmy Ismail,Bernhard Riedel,Linda Denehy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.628848

2021-03-19

Abstract:Objectives: This systematic review set out to identify, evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE 1946-2020, EMBASE 1947-2020, CINAHL 1937-2020, PEDro 1999-2020, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials 1991-2020) were systematically searched (until August 2020) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of prehabilitation interventions in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. This review included any form of prehabilitation either unimodal or multimodal that included whole body and/or respiratory exercises as a stand-alone intervention or in addition to other prehabilitation interventions (such as nutrition and psychology) compared to standard care. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 21 studies in the meta-analysis. There was moderate quality of evidence that multimodal prehabilitation improves pre-operative functional capacity as measured by 6 min walk distance (Mean difference [MD] 33.09 metres, 95% CI 17.69-48.50; p = <0.01) but improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness such as preoperative oxygen consumption at peak exercise (VO2 peak; MD 1.74 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.03-3.50; p = 0.05) and anaerobic threshold (AT; MD 1.21 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.34-2.76; p = 0.13) were not significant. A reduction in hospital length of stay (MD 3.68 days, 95% CI 0.92-6.44; p = 0.009) was observed but no effect was observed for postoperative complications (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.18; p = 0.27), pulmonary complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01; p = 0.05), hospital re-admission (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.90; p = 0.81) or postoperative mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.09, p = 0.90). Conclusion: Multimodal prehabilitation improves preoperative functional capacity with reduction in hospital length of stay. This supports the need for ongoing research on innovative cost-effective prehabilitation approaches, research within large multicentre studies to verify this effect and to explore implementation strategies within clinical practise.
Effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yinning Guo,Lingyu Ding,Xueyi Miao,Xiaoman Jiang,Ting Xu,Xinyi Xu,Shuqin Zhu,Qin Xu,Jieman Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07541-1

2022-12-19

Abstract:Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analys is aimed to explore the effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and other databases from database inception to 15 March 2022. Studies were included if they consisted of a prehabilitation intervention in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. Results: A total of 9 studies encompassing 1313 patients were included in the review. Through meta-analysis, prehabilitation has a positive impact on total complications (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.94, P = 0.004), severe complications (RR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.90, P = 0.01), and the average length of hospital stay (MD = - 1.36, 95% CI = - 2.38 to - 0.35, P = 0.008). But it had no differences in 30-day and 3-month mortality and 30-day and 3-month readmission rates. Through qualitative synthesis, two studies found that prehabilitation had a favorable tendency to promote functional recovery compared with the control group. Conclusion: Prehabilitation had a positive effect on postoperative complications and the average length of hospital stay in frail cancer patients. A personalized and supervised multimodal prehabilitation program with exercise at its core may be more beneficial for them. More studies with extensive follow-up are needed to confirm and update the findings of these results.
Prehabilitation and its Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

A. J. Rajendran,M. A. Raja,S. Benedic Kingslin Suresh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_13_23

2024-01-01

Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract:Abstract Prehabilitation is a multidisciplinary health enhancement programme offered before a disease intervention, such as surgery or chemotherapy/radiotherapy. It is a holistic patient care model that focuses on providing nutritional, psychological and functional care to patients before their intervention. Researchers have found that prehabilitation can improve patient outcomes by preparing for a surgery-associated physiological challenge. While studies have been limited, prehabilitation remains a promising strategy for cancer surgery with potential benefits such as improved outcomes, early recovery and lower hospital stay. The concept of prehabilitation has been growing rapidly, and it aims to enhance a patient’s overall health and well-being before surgery or other therapeutic interventions. Prehabilitation can be a valuable tool for cancer patients, providing advantages such as improved outcomes, early recovery and reduced hospital stay after surgery. However, more evidence is needed to support the effectiveness of prehabilitation. This review paper provides an overview of current knowledge and results of studies on the role of prehabilitation in cancer surgery, highlighting the positive effects of prehabilitation on physical performance, nutritional status, quality of life and sometimes reduced morbidity. Allied interventions, such as cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation, can also provide valuable lessons for prehabilitation in practice. This comprehensive review provides a well-structured and informative presentation, ensuring clarity and ease of understanding for a technical audience. The technical details are well-supported by appropriate references, ensuring accuracy and credibility. Overall, the paper is a thorough and informative review of prehabilitation in cancer patients, outlining key concepts and evidence and providing insights for future research and practice.
The Impact of Prehabilitation Interventions on Affective and Functional Outcomes for Young to Midlife Adult Cancer Patients: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Pamela Gallagher,Aideen Ms. Scriney,Amy Ms. Russell,Lisa Dr. Loughney,Lorraine Dr. Boran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6029

2022-09-09

Abstract:Objective Cancer remains one of the most enduring health crises of the modern world. Prehabilitation is a relatively new intervention aimed at preparing individuals for the stresses associated with treatment from diagnosis. Prehabilitation can include exercise, psychological and nutrition‐based interventions. The present systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation on affective and functional outcomes for young to midlife adult cancer patients (18‐55 years). Outcomes of interest included prehabilitation programme composition, duration, mode of delivery and measures used to determine impact on affective and functional outcomes. Methods The following databases were searched with controlled and free text vocabulary; PsychINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed. and full ‐text screening was conducted with a secondary reviewer and final texts were subject to risk of bias analysis. Results Thirteen texts were included at full‐text. These included data of 797 prehabilitation participants (mean age 53 years) and a large representation of female participants (71% average). Evidence was found for the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation for anxiety reduction. Prehabilitation did not significantly affect health related quality of life (HrQoL). Findings moderately supported the therapeutic validity of exercise prehabilitation for functional outcomes , both in terms of clinical and experimental improvement with respect to the quality of evidence. Variation between all prehabilitation types was observed. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation on stress, distress or depression. Conclusion Implications for future research are highlighted and then discussed with respect to this young to midlife age group. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

oncology,social sciences, biomedical,psychology, multidisciplinary
A Comprehensive Review on Rationale, Methodology, and Measures of Effectiveness

Carlos E. Guerra-Londono,Juan P. Cata,Katherine Nowak,Vijaya Gottumukkala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040162

2024-04-10

Current Oncology

Abstract:Cancer surgery places a significant burden on a patients' functional status and quality of life. In addition, cancer surgery is fraught with postoperative complications, themselves influenced by a patient's functional status. Prehabilitation is a unimodal or multimodal strategy that aims to increase a patient's functional capacity to reduce postoperative complications and improve postoperative recovery and quality of life. In most cases, it involves exercise, nutrition, and anxiety-reducing interventions. The impact of prehabilitation has been explored in several types of cancer surgery, most commonly colorectal and thoracic. Overall, the existing evidence suggests prehabilitation improves physiological outcomes (e.g., lean body mass, maximal oxygen consumption) as well as clinical outcomes (e.g., postoperative complications, quality of life). Notably, the benefit of prehabilitation is additional to that of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. While safe, prehabilitation programs require multidisciplinary coordination preoperatively. Despite the existence of numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the certainty of evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of prehabilitation is low to moderate, principally due to significant methodological heterogeneity and small sample sizes. There is a need for more large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials to draw strong clinical recommendations.

oncology
Sex peptide and the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster

W. Swanson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1834127100

2003-08-11

Abstract:On mating, Drosophila females undergo dramatic alterations in their reproductive physiology and behavior (Fig. 1) (1). Egg production and egg laying are significantly increased, and the female's propensity to remate is drastically reduced. These changes in the female have been shown to be initially induced by seminal fluids transferred from the male to the female during mating and to persist because of the presence of stored sperm in the female (referred to as the “sperm effect”). The male seminal fluid proteins are synthesized in paired secretory organs of the male reproductive tract called accessory glands, the products of which are referred to as accessory gland proteins (Acps). Acps have been studied because of their importance for reproduction as well as their interesting evolutionary dynamics. Two articles in this issue of PNAS provide additional insights into Acp function and the sperm effect by characterizing a null mutant (2) and RNA interference knockdowns (3) for one of the most interesting Acps, the Sex Peptide (SP) [Acp70A (4)]. Fig. 1. Image of Drosophila mating. The female decreases her remating rate and increases her egg-laying rate after mating due, in part, to the transfer of SP from the male to the female. (Photograph courtesy of Avis C. James and Gary Wolsieffer.) Mating-induced changes in female Drosophila have been described as occurring in two phases, short- and long-term stages. The short-term effect is attributed largely to the rapid action of several Acps, some acting before and during the storage of sperm. Through the use of males lacking Acps, sperm, or both, it was determined that the actions of Acps on their own last no longer than 1 day after mating (5, 6). The functions of the Acps have been studied by several methods, the two most robust using genetics to either ectopically express the Acp …
Effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anuj Punnoose,Ori Weiss,Vikas Khanduja,Alison B Rushton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031119

IF: 3.006

2019-11-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Undergoing major surgery can induce physical and functional decline. Prehabilitation programmes aim to improve physical fitness and function preoperatively and could enhance postoperative recovery and outcomes. Prehabilitation interventions have been utilised across a range of orthopaedic populations of all ages and can be multimodal in nature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery including day surgery procedures. It will also investigate the components of prehabilitation to understand optimum duration and frequency of programmes. Methods/design Systematic review and meta-analysis designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. A comprehensive electronic search will be performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, Embase, PEDro and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in order to identify randomised control trials published between January 2000 to 25 March 2019. ISI Web of Science, System for information on grey literature and the European Union clinical trials registry will identify studies that are underway or unpublished. Two independent reviewers will carry out the searches, study selection (title and abstract and full text stages), data extraction, risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0) and evaluation of overall strength of evidence. Meta-analyses will be used for data which demonstrates homogeneity, otherwise a narrative synthesis will be performed for groups of studies of high heterogeneity (I 2 >50%). The overall strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Ethics and dissemination This study raises no ethical issues. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions and may assist clinicians in determining which components, duration, frequency and the method of delivery would form the most effective prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgical procedure. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019123268.

medicine, general & internal
The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pavel Skořepa,Katherine L. Ford,Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Dominic O’Connor,Carla M. Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N. Lobo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.020

IF: 7.643

2024-01-24

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:Summary Background and aims Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes. Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥Grade 3) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software. Results Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0-78.4) years. Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one. Meta-analysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference -1.07 days, 95%CI -1.60 to -0.53 days, P<0.0001, I 2 =19%). Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44% (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.82, P<0.004, I 2 =51%). Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT. The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95%CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P<0.00001, I 2 =24%), favouring prehabilitation. Conclusion Given the significant impact on shortening length of stay and reducing severe complications, prehabilitation should be encouraged in frail, older and high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

nutrition & dietetics
Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Roberto Falz,Christian Bischoff,René Thieme,Johannes Lässing,Matthias Mehdorn,Sigmar Stelzner,Martin Busse,Ines Gockel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w

2022-06-13

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Functional capacity is an independent indicator of morbidity in colon and rectal cancer surgery. This systematic review describes the evaluated and synthesized effects of exercise prehabilitation depending on the duration of interventions on functional and postoperative outcomes in colon and rectal cancer surgery. Methods Three electronic databases (MEDLINE Pubmed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Registry) were systematically searched (January 2022) for controlled trials that investigated the effects of prehabilitation prior to colo-rectal cancer resection. Results Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review and 14 in our meta-analyses assessing these outcomes: the 6 min walk distance (6MWD), postoperative overall complications, and length of stay (LOS). We observed a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity as measured with 6MWD (mean difference: 30.8 m; 95% CI 13.3, 48.3; p = 0.0005) due to prehabilitation. No reductions in LOS (mean difference: – 0.27 days; 95% CI – 0.93, 0.40; p = 0.5) or postoperative overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.84; 95% CI 0.53, 1.31; p = 0.44) were observed. Prehabilitation lasting more than 3 weeks tended to lower overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI 0.4, 1.1; p = 0.11). However, the prehabilitation time periods differed between colon and rectal carcinoma resections. Conclusion Prehabilitation while the patient is preparing to undergo surgery for colorectal carcinoma improves functional capacity; and might reduce postoperative overall complications, but does not shorten the LOS. The studies we reviewed differ in target variables, design, and the intervention’s time period. Multicenter studies with sufficient statistical power and differentiating between colon and rectal carcinoma are needed to develop implementation strategies in the health care system. Registration PROSPERO CRD42022310532

oncology
Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JiaJun Zhang,YuRu Hu,HuiLi Deng,ZhongMou Huang,JianMei Huang,Qu Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241235590

2024-03-07

Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract:Integrative Cancer Therapies, Volume 23, Issue , January-December 2024. Background:The surgical intervention serves as the paramount and prevalent remedy for individuals afflicted with colorectal malignancies, with the significance of perioperative stewardship and convalescence being indisputable. Prehabilitation coupled with preoperative lifestyle modulation has demonstrated efficacy in patients subjected to certain classifications of abdominal procedures. However, the evidence pertaining to its impact on those battling colorectal cancer remains equivocal.Methods:A meta-analysis, grounded in pairwise contrast, of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was orchestrated, coupled with a systematic review, to probe the efficacy of preoperative lifestyle modulation and prehabilitation on patients' postoperative functionality and recuperation. An exhaustive exploration of 8 electronic databases and trial registries was undertaken to encompass all pertinent RCTs disseminated in English or Chinese from January 2012 through December 2022. Employing a random-effects model, we evaluated parameters such as the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT), complications, quality of life (QoL), aggregate and postoperative duration of hospitalization (tLHS and postLHS), and healthcare expenditure (HExp) for postoperative patients.Results:A total of 28 RCTs were incorporated into the systematic review and meta-analysis. Relative to conventional preoperative care, rehabilitation or preoperative lifestyle management was found to enhance postoperative 6MWT (SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.29) and diminish the complication rate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.69). Nonetheless, no significant discrepancies were observed in QoL (SMD 1.81, 95% CI −0.26 to 3.87), tLHS (SMD −0.26, 95% CI −0.68 to 0.15), and postLHS (SMD −1.46, 95% CI −3.12 to 0.20) between the groups. HExp could not be evaluated due to a lack of sufficient data for synthesis. Most pooled outcomes exhibited significant heterogeneity, urging a cautious interpretation. Subgroup analysis revealed that nutritional interventions could mitigate the incidence of complications, and preoperative exercise could improve tLHS and postLHS. A combined approach of physical, nutritional, and psychological intervention or prehabilitation proved superior to any single intervention in enhancing postoperative capabilities.Conclusion:This meta-analysis delineated the efficacy of preoperative interventions on postoperative capabilities in patients with colorectal cancer, thereby offering evidence for clinical practice. It was concluded that preoperative interventions are unequivocally beneficial for postoperative functional recovery and the reduction of complication rates in patients with colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, the acquisition of more high-level evidence is still necessitated to further ascertain the effectiveness of this strategy for other patient groups and to establish its best practices. The heterogeneity in the pooled outcomes underlines the need for future studies to be more uniform in their design and reporting, which would facilitate more robust and reliable meta-analyses.

oncology,integrative & complementary medicine
Effectiveness of an Exercise and Educational-Based Prehabilitation Program in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (PREOptimize) on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Anabel Casanovas-Álvarez,Blanca Estanyol,Magda Ciendones,Josep Padròs,Jordi Cuartero,Agustí Barnadas,Bárbara García-Valdecasas,Rubèn González-Colom,Raquel Sebio-García,Jaume Masià

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae151

2024-10-18

Abstract:Objective: The study objective was to determine the effectiveness of a prehabilitation program to decrease postoperative musculoskeletal impairments in patients who have breast cancer and are receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Methods: Patients who had breast cancer and were receiving NAT before surgery were invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial. Patients randomized to the intervention group participated in a group-based prehabilitation program consisting of Nordic walking, resistance training, and therapeutic education from month 4 of NAT until before surgery. Patients in the control group received usual care (no prehabilitation). The main outcome was arm function measured with the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire 1 month after surgery. Other measures included pain, range of motion, functional capacity, cancer-related fatigue, handgrip strength, physical activity, and arm circumferences. Results: A total of 64 patients were randomized during the study period, and 61 completed all assessments. A significant difference in the main outcome (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) was found before surgery as patients in the control group experienced worsening in arm function (mean difference = -9.84, 95% CI = -17.7 to -2). In addition, they also showed increased symptom frequency/severity according to the combined scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (mean difference = +6.7 points, 95% CI = 13.4 to 0.1) compared to the intervention group. Prehabilitation also improved functional capacity (mean difference = 67.6 m, 95% CI = 37.4 to 97.7) and physical activity levels and decreased cancer-related fatigue (mean difference = -1.3, 95% CI = -0.29 to -2.4) compared to the control group but had no effect on other secondary outcomes. After surgery, patients receiving prehabilitation also exhibited greater functional capacity at both 1 and 3 months. No other difference was observed. Conclusion: A prehabilitation program was able to maintain arm function and increase functional capacity while decreasing fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving NAT. Impact: Prehabilitation programs should be offered to patients with breast cancer to maintain functionality and enhance physical performance before surgery. Lay summary: An exercise program combined with therapeutic education in patients with breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery can improve functional capacity and prevent declines of arm mobility and function.
Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Anuj Punnoose,Leica S Claydon-Mueller,Ori Weiss,Jufen Zhang,Alison Rushton,Vikas Khanduja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8050

2023-04-03

Abstract:Importance: Prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have been gaining popularity in recent years. However, the current literature has produced varying results. Objective: To evaluate whether prehabilitation is associated with improved preoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with usual care for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Data sources: Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature], AMED [Allied and Complementary Medicine], Embase, PEDRO [Physiotherapy Evidence Database], and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for published trials, and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science, System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, and European clinical trials registry were searched for unpublished trials from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2022. Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing prehabilitation with standard care for any orthopedic surgical procedure were included. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers screened trials. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system and the study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main outcomes and measures: Pain, function, muscle strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Results: Forty-eight unique trials involving 3570 unique participants (2196 women [61.5%]; mean [SD] age, 64.1 [9.1] years) were analyzed. Preoperatively, moderate-certainty evidence favoring prehabilitation was reported for patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) for function (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.70 [95% CI, -1.08 to -0.32]) and muscle strength and flexion (SMD, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.23-1.77]) and for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) for HRQOL on the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (weighted mean difference [WMD], 7.35 [95% CI, 3.15-11.54]) and muscle strength and abduction (SMD, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.03-2.02]). High-certainty evidence was reported for patients undergoing lumbar surgery for back pain (WMD, -8.20 [95% CI, -8.85 to -7.55]) and moderate-certainty evidence for HRQOL (SMD, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.13-0.78]). Postoperatively, moderate-certainty evidence favoring prehabilitation was reported for function at 6 weeks in patients undergoing TKR (SMD, -0.51 [95% CI, -0.85 to -0.17]) and at 6 months in those undergoing lumbar surgery (SMD, -2.35 [95% CI, -3.92 to -0.79]). Other differences in outcomes favoring prehabilitation were of low to very low quality of evidence. Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence supported prehabilitation over usual care in improving preoperative function and strength in TKR and HRQOL and muscle strength in THR, high-certainty evidence in reducing back pain, and moderate-certainty evidence in improving HRQOL in lumbar surgery. Postoperatively, moderate-certainty evidence supported prehabilitation for function following TKR at 6 weeks and lumbar surgery at 6 months. Prehabilitation showed promising results for other outcomes, although high risk of bias and heterogeneity affected overall quality of evidence. Additional RCTs with a low risk of bias investigating preoperative and postoperative outcomes for all orthopedic surgical procedures are required.
Effect of prehabilitation for patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu,L.,Zheng,X.,Yan,Y.,Wang,B.,Wang,A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083914

IF: 3.006

2024-09-12

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Gastric cancer is a high-risk cancer with surgical treatments often leading to significant postoperative complications and mortality. Prehabilitation, involving exercise, nutrition and psychological support before surgery, aims to boost patients' physical and mental health. While effective in other cancers, its benefits for gastric cancer need further study. This research will evaluate the impact of trimodal prehabilitation on patient outcomes in gastric cancer surgery, aiming to reduce complications and expedite recovery. Methods and analysis This study will systematically review randomised controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the role of prehabilitation in people undergoing gastric cancer resection. The primary outcomes of interest will include overall postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes of interest will include mortality, readmission rate or functional recovery. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals (VIP) will be searched. All studies will be screened and selected using the criteria described in 'population, intervention/exposure, comparison, outcome and study design' format. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for relevance and methodological validity. Data from included studies will be extracted through a customised, preset data extraction sheet. The Cochrane Review Manager (V.5.3, Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) software will be used to perform the meta-analysis. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this study as all results will be based on published papers. No primary data collection will be needed. Study findings will be presented at scientific conferences or published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023488469.

medicine, general & internal
Dietary obesity in rats: influence of diet, weight, age, and sex on body composition.

R. Schemmel,O. Mickelsen,Z. Tolgay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPLEGACY.1969.216.2.373

1969-02-01

Abstract:
Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Federica Gonella,Paolo Massucco,Serena Perotti,Stefano Gianolio,Daniela Vassallo,Serena Monasterolo,Antonella Laezza,Beatrice De Zolt Ponte,Andrea Ricotti,Alessandro Ferrero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108688

2024-09-12

Abstract:Background: Prehabilitation (Prehab) programs aim to optimize patients psycho-physical condition before surgery, to improve post-operative outcomes. Although functional benefits of Prehab are known, the clinical impact does not yet have concrete evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prehab, associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and surgical rehabilitation (Rehab), in frail colorectal oncological patients in terms of morbidity and hospitalization. Patients and methods: The cohort of patients undergoing Prehab between January 2020 and December 2022 (Prehab group) is compared with the historical cohort of patients operated on in the period 01/2018-12/2019, not undergoing Prehab (no-Prehab group). Prehab scheme: multimodal (physiotherapy, clinical nutrition and psychological support). All patients followed an ERAS path. Only Prehab patients followed a surgical Rehab by a dedicated nurse case-manager. Propensity score matching (PSM) and weighting (PSW) analyses were used for statistical analysis. Primary objectives: complications at 30 days and hospital stay. Secondary objectives: functional outcomes. Results: In 3 years of preliminary enrollment, 36 patients completed the program: 22 in person, 16 in tele-prehab. The Prehab group experienced fewer complications than the no-Prehab group (PSM: 31 % vs 53 % p = 0.02; PSW: 31 % vs 51 % p = 0.02), less severe complications (CCI>20 PSM: 17 % vs 33 % p = 0.074; PSW: 17 % vs 53 % 0.026) and shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs 6 days; p = 0.02). Finally, prehabilitated patients improved their preoperative functional capacity and reduced anxiety levels. Conclusion: The strategy of combining Prehab with ERAS and Rehab has positively influenced post-operative clinical outcomes as well as functional parameters in our series.
Reversible Neuromuscular Syndrome in Malnourished Children

D. Donley,B. Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04076.x

1989-12-01

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract:Six young children are reported who were malnourished, with hypotonia, weakness and absent stretch reflexes, both proximally and distally, but with normal sensory examinations. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities also were normal. Five had mildly abnormal electromyograms, with scattered fibrillations, positive sharp waves and increased insertional activity, both proximally and distally. After adequate nutrition in hospital, all the children's reflexes returned and strength improved. Weight for height was an important indicator: it was decreased when the muscle stretch reflexes were absent and increased when they returned. The neurological and electrodiagnostic findings imply that this is a reversible lower motor‐neuron or muscle disorder.
A randomized controlled clinical trial on multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity: preliminary results

Antonio Pesce,Nicolò Fabbri,Simona Colombari,Lisa Uccellatori,Giovanni Grazzi,Rosario Lordi,Gabriele Anania,Carlo Vittorio Feo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11198-8

2024-08-29

Abstract:Introduction: Major colorectal surgery is associated with 20 to 40% reduction in physiological and functional capacity and higher level of fatigue 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the effects of a multimodal prehabilitation program in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity. The secondary outcome was to evaluate postoperative complications and length of postoperative hospital stay as well as to determine the costs of implementation and indirect costs. Methods: A single centre, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients of age > 18 years undergoing elective colorectal resection for colonic cancer were eligible. Exclusion criteria were metastatic disease, severe walking impairments, renal failure stage > 2, ASA score > 3, preoperative chemo-radiation therapy. Patients have been randomized either to prehabilitation intervention groups, receiving 4-week trimodal prehabilitation (physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support) or to control receiving no prehabilitation. Both groups followed enhanced recovery programs and received rehabilitation accordingly. The primary outcome for functional capacity was measured by the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) 4 and 8 weeks after surgery; to evaluate post-operative complications the Clavien-Dindo classification was used. Results: An interim analysis of 71 patients undergoing colorectal surgery was performed, with 35 assigned to interventional arm and 36 to control arm. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The prehabilitation group showed a significant increase in mean 6MWT distance pre-operatively compared to the control group, with an increase of 96 m (523 ± 24.6 vs. 427 ± 25.3, p = 0.01). At 4 and 8 weeks, the prehabilitation group maintained significant improvements, with an increase of 103 m (514 ± 89 vs. 411 ± 115, p = 0.003) and 90 m (531 ± 82 vs. 441 ± 107, p = 0.008), respectively. There were no statistical significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay between the two groups. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this study indicate that it is feasible to implement a prehabilitation protocol lasting approximately 4 weeks. This protocol appears to yield a significant improvement in the physical performance of patients with colon cancer undergoing elective colorectal resection at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery.
Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Pavel Skořepa,Carla M Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N Lobo,Dominic O'Connor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.07.1060

Abstract:Background and aims: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Results: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. Conclusion: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.

Der Anteil der einzelnen Zellarten an dem Holz der Rotbuche

Cerebrospinal fluid turnover and convexity block in mental impairment. A controlled prospective study.

Prehabilitation programs for individuals with cancer: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials

Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prehabilitation and its Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

The Impact of Prehabilitation Interventions on Affective and Functional Outcomes for Young to Midlife Adult Cancer Patients: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

A Comprehensive Review on Rationale, Methodology, and Measures of Effectiveness

Sex peptide and the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Preoperative Lifestyle Management and Prehabilitation on Postoperative Capability of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of an Exercise and Educational-Based Prehabilitation Program in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (PREOptimize) on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effect of prehabilitation for patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dietary obesity in rats: influence of diet, weight, age, and sex on body composition.

Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Reversible Neuromuscular Syndrome in Malnourished Children

A randomized controlled clinical trial on multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity: preliminary results

Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis