Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Short-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Focusing on Young-Old and Old-Old
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S389927
IF: 3.829
2022-12-06
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Peng Cui, 1, 2, &ast Peng Wang, 1, 2, &ast Xinli Hu, 1, 2, &ast Chao Kong, 1, 2 Shibao Lu 1, 2 1 Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Chao Kong; Shibao Lu, Email ; Background: There were exponentially increased studies focused on revealing the satisfactory outcomes after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. However, little attention has been paid to the impact of chronologic age alone on perioperative outcomes. Methods: In the present study, patients were dichotomized into two groups: young-old (65– 79 years), and old-old (80 years and older). Given the heterogeneity and age-related comorbidities in this population and the need to compare similar groups, we performed propensity score matching for gender, body mass index (BMI), operation time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), fusion levels and frail status. Perioperative outcomes were compared between two groups. Results: In our study, we found there were significant discrepancies in length of stay (LOS) (7.17 ± 2.81 vs 8.11 ± 3.57 days, p = 0.031) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (3.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.038); however, there were no significant differences in C-reactive protein (21.50 ± 26.52 vs 19.22 ± 22.04 mg/L, p = 0.490), overall complication rates (24.8% vs 33.0%, p = 0.179), ambulation time (2.89 ± 1.34 vs 2.55 ± 1.49 days, p = 0.078) or removal of urinary catheter time (2.47 ± 1.44 vs 2.32 ± 1.40 days, p = 0.446). Conclusion: There were few differences in perioperative outcomes between young-old and old-old groups. Despite similar postoperative complication rates, the old-old group might experience longer LOS when complications occur. More importantly, current outcomes suggested that chronologic age alone does not appear to have the capacity to reflect the tolerance of elderly patients to surgery. Keywords: enhanced recovery after surgery, propensity score matching, lumbar fusion surgery, elderly, postoperative outcomes It has been over twenty years since, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), was first proposed. 1 ERAS is a multimodal, multidisciplinary perioperative management strategy, with the purpose of reducing length of stay (LOS), perioperative adverse events and accelerating recovery, further shortening the hospitalization cost. 2–6 Although, ERAS applied just in recent years, bright prospect is envisioned in spine surgery. 2 According to the Seventh National Population Census in China, there were 264.02 million persons aged 60 and over, accounting for 18.7%, especially there were 190.64 million persons who were older than 65 years, accounting for 13.5%. 7 The aging of the population and the associated comorbidities impose continued pressure on health-care resources. Especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is of great importance to shorten LOS and accelerate bed turnover while assuring the quality of health care. 8 Recently published consensus statement in lumbar spinal fusion provided explicit guidance for perioperative care. 9 Implementing conventional perioperative management, studies reported satisfactory outcomes irrespective of LOS 2,10,11 or hospitalization cost 3,12 after implementing ERAS in spinal surgery. However, most of the studies were cross-sectional, which introduced confounding biases inevitably. Elderly patients are often recommended for conservative treatment, not least because of the higher incidence of postoperative adverse events after surgery in elderly patients. However, there have been conflicting findings regarding the influence of age on perioperative outcomes. 13,14 Therefore, we used propensity score matching in this study to control for confounding factors when comparing the impact of age on perioperative outcomes after implementing ERAS. This was a retrospective, monocentric study. We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving short-level posterior lumbar fusion surgery between July 2020 and December 2021. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) diagnosis of lumbar disk herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, or lumbar spondylolisthesis; 2) no history of spinal surgery; 3) age ≥65 years, and 4) short-level lumbar fusion surgery, defined as no more than two fusion levels. Exclusion criteria were 1) emergency -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology