Abstract:The analysis of morphology is crucial to the study of phylogeny in many ancient and modern organismal groups. Recently a number of arguments have been made in favor of regarding certain kinds of morphometric variables as putatively homologous characters and allowing them to participate, along with other non-morphometric variables, in parsimony-based cladistic analyses. These arguments rest on the assumptions that geometric landmarks incorporate the concept of biological homology and that partial warp and principal warp morphometric variables uniquely incorporate and operationalize the concept of spatial localization, thus providing investigators with the ability to assess patterns and directions of geometrical variation in unmeasured regions of organic forms. Literature review, coupled with empirical investigations of similarities and differences among three different morphometric data analysis methods on two different datasets suggest that there is no support for these assertions. Geometric landmarks, which form the basis for all morphometric measurements and latent shape variables, have no necessary correspondence to biological homology. Partial warp variables, coordinate-point eigenshape variables, and inter-landmark distance-based singular vector shape-change variables all express localized (= regionally-weighted) geometric deformations. However, none of these deformation patterns are localized in the sense of being truly independent from globally-distributed aspects of shape change. All three of the morphometric data analysis methods investigated are capable of inferring patterns of shape change in remote regions of the form so long as a spatially adequate array of landmarks is used as the basis for the shape analysis. Based on these results it is concluded that: (1) all types of morphometric procedures are potentially useful in phylogenetic inference to the extent that they are able to summarize patterns of biotic shape change within the Euclidean space of the original measurements; (2) morphometric interpretations are strengthened by using alternative analytic approaches to probe the geometric system in a hypothetico-deductive manner and achieve a robust and consistent interpretation of underlying differences among operational taxonomic units (OTU s); and (3) while deformation- based morphometric variables can be used to analyze the distribution of organic shapes in a variety of measurement and latent variable spaces, they represent abstract investigative tools that are tied irreducibly to particular samples and data. Such variables can be used to study morphological characters, refine character and character state definitions, and aid in the assignment of character states to OTU s. However, they are not characters themselves and may not be suitable for phylogenetic analyses directly. In addition, a new morphometric data analysis technique coordinate-point eigenshape analysis is described and its use illustrated.

Two methods for geometric morphometric analysis of trichodinids from killifishes

Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Comparative exploration of the morphological plasticity of Trichodina centrostrigeata (Peritrichia: Mobilida), ectoparasite from the gills of two tilapia species (Oreochromis niloticus and O. mossambicus) in a global context

New Insights into Geometric Morphometry Applied to Fish Scales for Species Identification

Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae

Comparing geometric morphometrics and outline fitting methods to monitor fish shape variability of Diplodus puntazzo (Teleostea: Sparidae)

Morphometric Analysis of Two Eocene Related Radiolarian Species of the Podocyrtis (lampterium) Lineage

LANDMARKS, LOCALIZATION AND THE USE OF MORPHOMETRICS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Character variation in separate body regions of Gerreidae (Osteichthyes: Teleostei) fishes inferred from geometric morphometrics

Combined otolith morphology and morphometry for assessing taxonomy and diversity in fossil and extant killifish (Aphanius, †Prolebias)

Geometric morphometrics as a tool for identifying emperor fish (Lethrinidae) larvae and juveniles

Morphological Differences Between Close Populations Discernible by Multivariate Analysis: A Case Study of Genuscoilia(teleostei: Clupeiforms)

Geometric morphometric analysis of Pleuronectiformes vertebrae: A new tool to identify archaeological fish remains?

Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics: What Fish Shapes Can Tell Us about Fish Evolution

Is shape in the eye of the beholder? Assessing landmarking error in geometric morphometric analyses on live fish

Alternative 2D and 3D Form Characterization Approaches to the Automated Identification of Biological Species

Head geometric morphometrics as a reliable method to discriminate sexes and species of Megalopta, a nocturnal bee genus (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)

Testing otolith morphology for measuring marine fish biodiversity

Shape variation in Sericoidini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae) with emphasis on Blepharotoma Blanchard, 1850 using geometric morphometrics

Geometric morphometrics applied to the study of morphological variation in South American species of the genus Cormocephalus Newport, 1844 (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha, Scolopendridae), and description of a new species from Colombia

Using body geometric morphometrics to identify bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) populations in the Northeastern Atlantic