Abstract:Some species of the genus Cormocephalus have been described based on a few specimens, which makes it difficult to quantify intra- and interspecific morphological variation. As a result, some diagnostic morphological characteristics may be ambiguous or have no real taxonomic value in species delimitation. In this context, geometric morphometrics emerges as a valuable tool capable of evaluating the variation in shape of a given taxon in a quantitative way, helping to clarify hypotheses about its morphological characteristics. In this study, geometric morphometrics was implemented to record shape variation in three external morphological structures (cephalic plate, forcipular coxosternite, and tergite 21) of three species: C. andinus ( Kraepelin, 1903 ), C. brasiliensis Humbert & Saussure, 1870 , and C. guildingii Newport, 1845 , distributed in South America. The objective was to evaluate and describe the morphological differences between species within the genus. Additionally, ten out of the 13 South American species described within the genus were reviewed and used as comparative material in the description of a new species from Colombia. As a result, the geographic distribution of the examined species is expanded, and the list of species belonging to the guildingii -subgroup is updated. The following taxonomic changes are suggested: C. abundantis González-Sponga, 2000 , and C. edithae González-Sponga, 2000 , are proposed as junior synonyms of C. brasiliensis ; C. amazonae ( Chamberlin, 1914 ), as junior synonym of C. andinus ; and C. facilis González-Sponga, 2000 , C. glabratus González-Sponga, 2000 , and C. maritme González-Sponga, 2000 as junior synonyms of C. guildingii . Regarding geometric morphometry, the shape of the three structures differed significantly among species: the analysis of canonical variates revealed low shape overlap. The cross-validation test demonstrated general discrimination rates of 81.25% for the cephalic plate, 84.00% for forcipular coxosternite, and 73.49% for tergite 21. In terms of allometric percentage, only a low proportion of the shape variation can be attributed to size variation: 9.27% for the cephalic plate, 6.18% for forcipular coxosternite, and 3.89% for tergite 21. The lower percentage rates found in C. guildingii may be associated with its broader geographic distribution compared to the other analyzed species, potentially resulting in greater morphological variation. Furthermore, the relatively smaller sample size may also have influenced these results. However, it can be concluded that morphometric analysis can provide enlightening insights and relatively robust results compared to other studies applied to similar taxa, highlighting the usefulness of morphometric analysis in the characterization of the group.

Shape variation in Sericoidini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae) with emphasis on Blepharotoma Blanchard, 1850 using geometric morphometrics

Geometric morphometrics applied to the study of morphological variation in South American species of the genus Cormocephalus Newport, 1844 (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha, Scolopendridae), and description of a new species from Colombia

Geometric morphometrics of the wings of Amazonian species of Melipona (Illiger, 1806) (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Anatomy of the mandibular corpus of extant cercopithecids : taxonomy and variation

Unraveling the Morphological Variation of Triatoma infestans in the Peridomestic Habitats of Chuquisaca Bolivia: A Geometric Morphometric Approach

Geometric morphometrics analysis of forensically important Sarcophaga species

Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) development by landmark-based geometric morphometrics of cephalopharyngeal skeleton: a preliminary assessment for forensic entomology application

Morphological Variation in the Wing Mite Periglischrus paracaligus (Acari: Spinturnicidae) Associated With Different Moving Strategies of the Host Leptonycteris yerbabuenae (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

Geometric morphometrics of silky pocket mice ( Perognathus : Perognathinae: Rodentia) crania reveals new insights into their variation, evolution, and taxonomy

Camel spider trait evolution demonstrates repeated patterns of convergence (Arachnida: Solifugae: Eremobatidae)

Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Genus Chaetocnema (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticini) with Insights on Its Subgenera Classification and Morphological Diversity

Geometric morphometry of the Rhodnius prolixus complex (Hemiptera, Triatominae): patterns of intraspecific and interspecific allometry and their taxonomic implications

Analyzing morphometry among extant and extinct species: A case study of genus Agassizia (Spatangoida: Echinoidea)

Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two‐dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys

On the Trail of Morphological Traits: Morphometry Helps to Clarify Morphological Variation in Section Viperella (Sisyrinchium)

Detecting Taxonomic Signal in an Under-Utilised Character System: Geometric Morphometrics of the Forcipular Coxae of Scutigeromorpha (Chilopoda).

Head geometric morphometrics as a reliable method to discriminate sexes and species of Megalopta, a nocturnal bee genus (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)

The issue of continuous characters in the copulatory bulb of Neodiplothele spiders: a morpho-geometric approach

Linear Morphometry of Male Genitalia Distinguishes the Ant Genera Monomorium and Syllophopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Madagascar

Cranial variation in species and subspecies of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys, Dipodomyinae, Rodentia) according to geometric morphometrics

Taxonomic status of large- and middle-sized Calomys (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) from the southern central Andes inferred through geometric morphometrics of the skull