Abstract:Some species of the genus Cormocephalus have been described based on a few specimens, which makes it difficult to quantify intra- and interspecific morphological variation. As a result, some diagnostic morphological characteristics may be ambiguous or have no real taxonomic value in species delimitation. In this context, geometric morphometrics emerges as a valuable tool capable of evaluating the variation in shape of a given taxon in a quantitative way, helping to clarify hypotheses about its morphological characteristics. In this study, geometric morphometrics was implemented to record shape variation in three external morphological structures (cephalic plate, forcipular coxosternite, and tergite 21) of three species: C. andinus ( Kraepelin, 1903 ), C. brasiliensis Humbert & Saussure, 1870 , and C. guildingii Newport, 1845 , distributed in South America. The objective was to evaluate and describe the morphological differences between species within the genus. Additionally, ten out of the 13 South American species described within the genus were reviewed and used as comparative material in the description of a new species from Colombia. As a result, the geographic distribution of the examined species is expanded, and the list of species belonging to the guildingii -subgroup is updated. The following taxonomic changes are suggested: C. abundantis González-Sponga, 2000 , and C. edithae González-Sponga, 2000 , are proposed as junior synonyms of C. brasiliensis ; C. amazonae ( Chamberlin, 1914 ), as junior synonym of C. andinus ; and C. facilis González-Sponga, 2000 , C. glabratus González-Sponga, 2000 , and C. maritme González-Sponga, 2000 as junior synonyms of C. guildingii . Regarding geometric morphometry, the shape of the three structures differed significantly among species: the analysis of canonical variates revealed low shape overlap. The cross-validation test demonstrated general discrimination rates of 81.25% for the cephalic plate, 84.00% for forcipular coxosternite, and 73.49% for tergite 21. In terms of allometric percentage, only a low proportion of the shape variation can be attributed to size variation: 9.27% for the cephalic plate, 6.18% for forcipular coxosternite, and 3.89% for tergite 21. The lower percentage rates found in C. guildingii may be associated with its broader geographic distribution compared to the other analyzed species, potentially resulting in greater morphological variation. Furthermore, the relatively smaller sample size may also have influenced these results. However, it can be concluded that morphometric analysis can provide enlightening insights and relatively robust results compared to other studies applied to similar taxa, highlighting the usefulness of morphometric analysis in the characterization of the group.

Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Genus Chaetocnema (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticini) with Insights on Its Subgenera Classification and Morphological Diversity

Characterisation of Two Chinese Native Hemicriconemoides Species (nematoda: Criconematidae) with Updated Descriptions of H-chitwoodi Esser, 1960 and Criconemoides Myungsugae Choi & Geraert, 1975

ASSESSING SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF THE GENUS CHRYSOMYA (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) BY DNA BARCODING

Geometric morphometrics applied to the study of morphological variation in South American species of the genus Cormocephalus Newport, 1844 (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha, Scolopendridae), and description of a new species from Colombia

Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) development by landmark-based geometric morphometrics of cephalopharyngeal skeleton: a preliminary assessment for forensic entomology application

Geometric Morphometric Analysis for the Systematic Elucidation of New Hylicellidae from the Jurassic of China (hemiptera: Cicadomorpha)

Identifying Morphs of the Yellow-Legged Hornet (Vespa velutina) and Other Pests of Quarantine Importance with Geometric Morphometrics

Geometric Morphometrics and Genetic Diversity Analysis of Chalcidoidea (Diglyphus and Pachyneuron) at Various Elevations

Cytochalasans and azaphilones: suitable chemotaxonomic markers for the Chaetomium species

Phylogeny of the superfamily Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Obtectomera), with an exploratory application on geometric morphometrics

Unravelling the obscure homology: postembryonic development of chaetotaxic traits in a basal hexapod taxon (Collembola: Tomoceridae)

Detecting Taxonomic Signal in an Under-Utilised Character System: Geometric Morphometrics of the Forcipular Coxae of Scutigeromorpha (Chilopoda).

Shape variation in Sericoidini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae) with emphasis on Blepharotoma Blanchard, 1850 using geometric morphometrics

Multivariate similarity clustering analysis: a new method regarding biogeography and its application in global insects

Scrutinising an inscrutable bark-nesting ant: Exploring cryptic diversity in the Rhopalomastix javana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) complex using DNA barcodes, genome-wide MIG-seq and geometric morphometrics

Comparative Morphology and Ultrastructure of Antennal Sensilla in Dendrolimus superans (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) and Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)

Phylogenetic analyses of the leafhopper tribe Chiasmini Distant, 1908 and delimination of species of the genus Exitianus Ball, 1929 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Chiasmini) in China based on molecular data

Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Phylogenetics, Molecular Species Delimitation and Geometric Morphometrics of All Reddish-Brown Species in the Genus Neotriplax Lewis, 1887 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Tritomini)

Citizen science and integrative taxonomy reveal a great diversity within Caribbean Chaetopteridae (Annelida), with the description of one new species

Taxonomy, phylogeny and identification of Chaetomiaceae with emphasis on thermophilic species