Abstract:Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis.Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis.Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. To investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. 49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Biopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. For pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions.

The factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Small (≤20 Mm) Pancreatic Lesions

Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions

Potential Factors of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Associated with Percentage of Classifying Pathologic Diagnosis for Pancreatic Diseases

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Single-Center Analysis

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review

Guiding and controlling percutaneous pancreas biopsies with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: target lesions are not localized on B-mode ultrasound.

Guidance and Control of Percutaneous Biopsy in Pancreatic Lesions with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

Comparison of Smear Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in EUS-guided FNA of Pancreatic Lesions: Experience from a Large Tertiary Center

Optimal Number of Needle Passes During EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions with 22G ProCore Needles and Different Suction Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Identification of Endosonographic Features that Compromise EUS-FNB Diagnostic Accuracy in Pancreatic Masses

Diagnostic Value of EUS-FNA for Pancreatic Masses and Its Influential Factors

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Biopsy in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Space Occupying Lesions

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Different Needle Types for Solid Pancreatic Masses: a Prospective and Randomized Comparative Trial in Two Centers

Optimal Sampling Technique for EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using a 25-Gauge ProCore Needle: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Superiority Study

Impact of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Results in the Management and Outcome of Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses

Factors Affecting the Learning Curve in the Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Study

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses