[Dimensions of suicide].

H. Warnes

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Personalized selection of unequal sub-arc collimator angles in VMAT for multiple brain metastases

Shi-Xiong Huang,Song-Hua Yang,Biao Zeng,Xiao-Hua Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111513

Abstract:Purpose: Investigating the effects of unequal sub-arc personalized collimator angle selection on the quality of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for treating multiple brain metastases. Methods: This study included 21 patients, each with 2-4 target volumes of multiple brain metastases. Two stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) approaches were utilized: sub-arc collimator VMAT (SAC-VMAT) and fixed collimator VMAT (FC-VMAT). In the SAC-VMAT group, multi-leaf collimators (MLC) shaped the target area, dividing the full arc into four unequal sub-arcs under the beam's eye view (BEV). Each sub-arc had an appropriate collimator angle selected to mitigate 'island blocking problems'. Conversely, the FC-VMAT group used a fixed collimator angle of 15° or 345°. A comparative analysis of the dosimetric parameters of the target volumes and normal tissues, along with the monitor units (MU), was conducted between the two groups. Results: The mean dose and dose-volume to normal brain tissue (2-26 Gy, with a step of 2 Gy) were significantly lower in the SAC-VMAT group (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in dose to the target volumes, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and other normal tissues (P > 0.05). Compared with the FA-VMAT group, the SAC-VMAT group significantly reduced the gradient index (GI) (4.5 ± 0.59 vs 5.2 ± 0.75, P < 0.001) and MU (1774.33 ± 181.77 vs 2001.0 ± 344.86, P < 0.001). Notably, with an increase in the number of PTV, the SAC-VMAT group demonstrated more significant improvements in the dose-volume of normal brain tissue, GI, and MU. Conclusions: In this study, personalized selection of the unequal sub-arc collimator angle ensured the prescribed dose to the PTV, CI, and HI, while significantly reducing the GI, MU, and the dose to normal brain tissue in the VMAT plan for multi-target brain metastases in the cohort of cases with 2-4 target volumes. Particularly as the number of targets increase, the advantages of this method become more pronounced.
Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Using Multicriteria Optimization for Body and Extremity Sarcoma.

Michael R. Young,David L. Craft,Caroline M. Colbert,Kyla Remillard,Liam Vanbenthuysen,Yi Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6547

2016-01-01

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Abstract:This study evaluates the implementation of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using multicriteria optimization (MCO) in the RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) for complex sites, namely extremity and body sarcoma. The VMAT-MCO algorithm implemented in RayStation is newly developed and requires an integrated, comprehensive analysis of plan generation, delivery, and treatment efficiency. Ten patients previously treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with MCO were randomly selected and replanned using VMAT-MCO. The plan quality was compared using homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume (PTV) and dose sparing of organs at risk (OARs). Given the diversity of the tumor location, the 10 plans did not have a common OAR except for skin. The skin D50 and Dmean was directly compared between VMAT-MCO and IMRT-MCO. Additional OAR dose points were compared on a plan-by-plan basis. The treatment efficiency was compared using plan monitor units (MU) and net beam-on time. Plan quality assurance was performed using the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK phantom and a gamma criteria of 3%/3 mm. No statistically significant differences were found between VMAT- and IMRT-MCO for HI and CI of the PTV or D50 and Dmean to the skin. The VMAT-MCO plans showed general improvements in sparing to OARs. The VMAT-MCO plan set showed statistically significant improvements over the IMRT-MCO set in treatment efficiency per plan MU (p < 0.05) and net beam-on time (p < 0.01). The VMAT-MCO plan deliverability was validated. Similar gamma passing rates were observed for the two modalities. This study verifies the suitability of VMAT-MCO for sarcoma cancer and highlighted the comparability in plan quality and improve-ment in treatment efficiency offered by VMAT-MCO as compared to IMRT-MCO.
Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases

Shi-Xiong Huang,Song-Hua Yang,Biao Zeng,Xiao-Hua Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y

2024-09-05

Abstract:To develop and assess an automated Sub-arc Collimator Angle Optimization (SACAO) algorithm and Cumulative Blocking Index Ratio (CBIR) metrics for single-isocenter coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to treat multiple brain metastases. This study included 31 patients with multiple brain metastases, each having 2 to 8 targets. Initially, for each control point, the MLC blocking index was calculated at different collimator angles, resulting in a two-dimensional heatmap. Optimal sub-arc segmentation and collimator angle optimization were achieved using an interval dynamic programming algorithm. Subsequently, VMAT plans were designed using two approaches: SACAO and the conventional Full-Arc Fixed Collimator Angle. CBIR was calculated as the ratio of the cumulative blocking index between the two plan approaches. Finally, dosimetric and planning parameters of both plans were compared. Normal brain tissue, brainstem, and eyes received better protection in the SACAO group (P < 0.05).Query Notable reductions in the SACAO group included 11.47% in gradient index (GI), 15.03% in monitor units (MU), 15.73% in mean control point Jaw area (AJaw,mean), and 19.14% in mean control point Jaw-X width (WJaw-X,mean), all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CBIR showed a strong negative correlation with the degree of plan improvement. The SACAO method enhanced protection of normal organs while improving transmission efficiency and optimization performance of VMAT. In particular, the CBIR metrics show promise in quantifying the differences specifically in the 'island blocking problem' between SACAO and conventional VMAT, and in guiding the enhanced application of the SACAO algorithm.
Characteristics of European family and household systems.

R. Wall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.23.1998.1/2.44-66

Abstract:"This article establishes that there was considerable diversity in the size and composition of the kin group within the household that is not captured by the conventional classification of family systems according to the relative proportions of simple and complex household forms. Three case studies are presented from England, Corsica and Hungary. English households fulfilled an important welfare role in that they incorporated relatives and non-relatives who were not members of core families-- couples or parent(s) and unmarried child(ren). The societies of Corsica and Hungary provided a greater proportion of their populations with membership of a core family."
Dosimetric advantages of dual arc increments for head and neck volumetric‐modulated arc therapy in the Monaco treatment planning system

Jin Hwa Choi,Hyejo Ryu,Do Hoon Oh,Lee Yoo,Minsoo Chun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14571

2024-11-30

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Abstract:Purpose This study aimed to assess the dosimetric advantages of dual arc increments in head and neck volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). Methods Three VMAT plans were created for each of the 10 patients by prescribing 70 Gy in 35 fractions with arc increment combinations of 30°/30°, 15°/15°, and 30°/15° in the Monaco TPS. The dose to 0.03 cm3 volume (D0.03cc), conformity number, and homogeneity and gradient indices was compared for the planning target volume (PTV), and the D0.03cc and mean dose (Dmean) of the spinal cord, brain stem, parotid glands were compared. For plan complexity evaluation, the monitor unit and various related metrics were compared. Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests were performed across plans for the evaluated indicators. Results For PTV, plans with 30°/15° showed comparable D0.03cc and homogeneity and gradient indices to those of plans with 30°/30° and 15°/15° while exhibiting a better conformity number. The D0.03cc for spinal cord and brain stem for plans with 30°/15° were 26.0% and 20.8% less than those with 30°/30° and 16.8% and 19.0% less than those with 15°/15°, respectively. The Dmean for the left and right parotid glands under plans with 30°/15° were 17.4% and 13.2% less than those with 30°/30° and 14.0% and 9.8% less than those with 15°/15°, respectively. The total monitor unit in plans with 30°/15° was less than that in other plans but with no significance. The plans with 30°/15° showed higher modulation complexity and plan‐averaged irregularity, while no significant differences observed in both plan‐averaged area and modulation compared with other plans. Conclusion In head and neck VMAT, a dual arc increment of 30°/15° seems advisable because it can substantially reduce doses to normal tissues with comparable delivery efficiency while maintaining target dose coverage.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Dosimetric Evaluations of Different Accelerator Based Treatment Modalities for Curative Intent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Isolated Thoracic Spinal Metastases

L. Ma,J. Yang,X. S. Wang,W. Xu,X. H. Kong,H. Yang,J. Y. Wang,S. P. Xu,Z. J. Ju,L. Du,B. N. Cai,C. C. Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.717

2015-01-01

Abstract:To investigate the dosimetric characteristics of 4 linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) modalities, CyberKnife (CK, Accuray), helical tomotherapy (HT, Accuray TomoTherapy system), double-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) performed with RapidArc system (RA, Varian) and step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (sIMRT, Elekta Synergy S system) on isolated thoracic spinal metastasis . CK, HT, RA and sIMRT plans were cross compared in 10 patients with 6 body type and 6 body + pedicle type isolated thoracic metastases, with curative-intent prescription dose of 33 Gy/3F and 40 Gy/5F to covering ≥90% of the target volume, respectively. Different dosimetric indices, beam-on-time, and MUs were evaluated in details In ensuring the dose-volume constraints for cord and esophagus of the premise, CK, HT and RA achieved a sharp gradient index (GI) and a small penumbra volume compared to sIMRT. RA achieved a better conformity index (CI) compared to CK, HT and sIMRT. CK had a heterogeneous dose distribution in the target volume. CK occupied the longest beam-on-time and the highest MUs, followed by HT, sIMRT and RA with shortest and the least MUs. For the body type metastasis, CK, HT and RA satisfied the target coverage of ≥90% in all the 6 cases, but only in 3 cases (50%) by sIMRT. For the body + pedicle type metastasis, HT satisfied the criterion of the target coverage criterion in 4 out of the 6 cases, and reached target coverage of 89.0% in another case. The criterion of the target coverage was satisfied in 2 cases by CK and RA, but only in 1 case by sIMRT. For curative-intent SBRT with isolated thoracic spinal metastasis, RA is the common choice for the body type metastasis with current LINAC systems, then followed by CK or HT techniques if available; HT is the preferential choice for the body + pedicle type metastasis. This study suggests further clinical investigations to differential individual benefits.
Effect of the Collimator Angle on Dosimetric Verification of the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Yong Ho Kim,Ha Ryung Park,Won Taek Kim,Dong Won Kim,Yongkan Ki,Juhye Lee,Jinsuk Bae,Dahl Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.03569

2015-03-12

Abstract:Collimator angle is usually rotated when planning volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) due to the leakage of radiation between multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaves. We studied the effect of the collimator angles on the results of dosimetric verification of the VMAT plans for head and neck patients. We studied VMAT plans for 10 head and neck patients. We made 2 sets of VMAT plans for each patient. Each set was composed of 10 plans with collimator angles of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 degrees. Plans in the first set were optimized individually and plans in the second set shared the 30 degree collimator angle optimization. Two sets of plans were verified using the 2-dimensional ion chamber array MatriXX (IBA Dosimetry, Germany). The comparison between the calculation and measurements were made by the $\gamma$-index analysis. The $\gamma$-index (2\%/2 mm) and (3\%/3 mm) passing rates had negative correlations with the collimator angle. Maximum difference between $\gamma$-index (3\%/3 mm) passing rates of different collimator angles for each patient ranged from 1.46\% to 5.60\% with an average of 3.67\%. There were significant differences (maximum 5.6\%) in the passing rates of different collimator angles. The results suggested that the accuracy of the delivered dose depends on the collimator angle. These findings are informative when choosing a collimator angle in VMAT plans.

Medical Physics
Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases.

Jun Yang,Lin Ma,Xiao-Shen Wang,Wei Xu Xu,Xiao-Hu Cong,Shou-Ping Xu,Zhong-Jian Ju,Lei Du,Bo-Ning Cai,Jack Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2015.10.003

2016-01-01

Abstract:To investigate the dosimetric characteristics of 4 SBRT-capable dose delivery systems, CyberKnife (CK), Helical TomoTherapy (HT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) by Varian RapidArc (RA), and segmental step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by Elekta, on isolated thoracic spinal lesions. CK, HT, RA, and IMRT planning were performed simultaneously for 10 randomly selected patients with 6 body types and 6 body + pedicle types with isolated thoracic lesions. The prescription was set with curative intent and dose of either 33Gy in 3 fractions (3F) or 40Gy in 5F to cover at least 90% of the planning target volume (PTV), correspondingly. Different dosimetric indices, beam-on time, and monitor units (MUs) were evaluated to compare the advantages/disadvantages of each delivery modality. In ensuring the dose-volume constraints for cord and esophagus of the premise, CK, HT, and RA all achieved a sharp conformity index (CI) and a small penumbra volume compared to IMRT. RA achieved a CI comparable to those from CK, HT, and IMRT. CK had a heterogeneous dose distribution in the target as its radiosurgical nature with less dose uniformity inside the target. CK had the longest beam-on time and the largest MUs, followed by HT and RA. IMRT presented the shortest beam-on time and the least MUs delivery. For the body-type lesions, CK, HT, and RA satisfied the target coverage criterion in 6 cases, but the criterion was satisfied in only 3 (50%) cases with the IMRT technique. For the body + pedicle-type lesions, HT satisfied the criterion of the target coverage of ≥90% in 4 of the 6 cases, and reached a target coverage of 89.0% in another case. However, the criterion of the target coverage of ≥90% was reached in 2 cases by CK and RA, and only in 1 case by IMRT. For curative-intent SBRT of isolated thoracic spinal lesions, RA is the first choice for the body-type lesions owing to its delivery efficiency (time); the second choice is CK or HT; HT is the preferential choice for the body + pedicle-type lesions. This study suggests further clinical investigations with longer follow-up for these studied cases.
Expression of interleukin 1 receptors is restricted to the L3T4+ subset of mature T lymphocytes.

J. Lowenthal,H. Macdonald

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.138.1.1

1987-01-01

Abstract:
Evaluation of six portable blood glucose meters for measuring blood glucose concentration in dogs.

T. A. Cohen,R. Nelson,P. Kass,M. Christopher,E. Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.235.3.276

2009-08-01

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate accuracy of 6 portable blood glucose meters (PBGMs) by comparing results of these meters with results obtained with a reference chemistry analyzer. DESIGN Evaluation study. ANIMALS 49 dogs (158 blood samples). Procedures-Venous blood samples were tested with the 6 PBGMs, and results were compared with results of a commercially available analyzer that used a reference method based on the hexokinase reaction. RESULTS Plasma glucose concentrations obtained with the reference analyzer ranged from 41 to 639 mg/dL. There were significant correlations between blood glucose concentrations obtained with the 6 PBGMs and plasma glucose concentrations obtained with the reference analyzer (r > or = 0.96). However, for all 6 PBGMs, results differed from results for the reference analyzer, with the difference increasing as plasma glucose concentration increased. Significant differences in bias were found among meters. For 142 samples classified as hypoglycemic, euglycemic, or hyperglycemic on the basis of results of the reference analyzer, the percentage of samples that were misclassified on the basis of results of the PBGMs ranged from 2.1% to 38.7%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results of the present study suggested that there were substantial differences in the accuracy of currently available PBGMs when used to determine blood glucose concentration in dogs.
Dosimetric comparison of commonly used volumetric modulated arc therapy field arrangements based on flattening filter-free beams for synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma radiotherapy

Xingxing Zhang,Juntian Shi,Xiuxiu Wu,Liting Li,Wei Sun,Yongmei Zou,Guoquan Chen,Shaokun Wu,Song Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2023.11.002

IF: 3.439

2023-11-16

Practical Radiation Oncology

Abstract:Purpose Flattening filter-free (FFF)-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been shown to be feasible and significantly improves treatment efficiency and lung protection for synchronous bilateral breast irradiation (SBBI). This research compared the commonly used VMAT field arrangements using FFF beams. Methods Twenty-eight patients underwent SBBI were retrospectively enrolled to design irradiation plans using tangential arc VMAT (taVMAT), half arc VMAT (haVMAT), and large arc VMAT (laVMAT). Dosimetric and delivery parameters of all designed plans were recorded and compared. Results Comparable target volume coverage was observed for all field arrangements. taVMAT significantly reduced the dose to spinal cord and the volume covered by 5 Gy ( V5Gy ) and V7Gy of the lungs while decreasing the conformity index (CI) of the target volume. It also increased the volume covered by 105% of the prescription dose ( V105% ) and V107% of the target volume. haVMAT considerably decreased V 20Gy and V 30Gy of the lungs, mean dose ( Dmean ) and V 30Gy of the heart and the liver. It also notably reduced Dmean and V 40Gy of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) while increasing the beam-on time. laVMAT significantly reduced the mean treatment time (ranging from 113 to 117 s) compared to the other field arrangements. Conclusions There were distinct differences in various dosimetric and delivery parameters for different field arrangements, highlighting the importance of selecting the appropriate field arrangement based on specific treatment goals and considerations. This study contributes valuable insights into the use of FFF-based VMAT techniques in SBBI.

oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

Yang Sheng,Taoran Li,Yaorong Ge,Hui Lin,Wentao Wang,Lulin Yuan,Q Jackie Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-169

Abstract:Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver cancer has shown promising therapeutic effects. Effective treatment relies not only on the precise delivery provided by image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) but also high dose gradient formed around the treatment volume to spare functional liver tissue, which is highly dependent on the beam/arc angle selection. In this study, we aim to develop a decision support model to learn human planner's beam navigation approach for beam angle/arc angle selection for liver SBRT. Methods: A total of 27 liver SBRT/HIGRT patients (10 IMRT, 17 VMAT/DCA) were included in this study. A dosimetric budget index was defined for each beam angle/control point considering dose penetration through the patient body and liver tissue. Optimal beam angle setting (beam angles for IMRT and start/terminal angle for VMAT/DCA) was determined by minimizing the loss function defined as the sum of total dosimetric budget index and beam span penalty function. Leave-one-out validation was exercised on all 27 cases while weighting coefficients in the loss function was tuned in nested cross validation. To compare the efficacy of the model, a model plan was generated using automatically generated beam setting while retaining the original optimization constraints in the clinical plan. Model plan was normalized to the same planning target volume (PTV) V100% as the clinical plans. Dosimetric endpoints including PTV D98%, D2%, liver V20Gy and total MU were compared between two plan groups. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was performed with the null hypothesis being that no difference exists between two plan groups. Results: Beam setting prediction was instantaneous. Mean PTV D98% was 91.3% and 91.3% (P=0.566), while mean PTV D2% was 107.9% and 108.1% (P=0.164) for clinical plan and model plan respectively. Liver V20Gy showed no significant difference (P=0.590) with 23.3% for clinical plan and 23.4% for the model plan. Total MU is comparable (P=0.256) between the clinical plan (avg. 2,389.6) and model plan (avg. 2,319.6). Conclusions: The evidence driven beam setting model yielded similar plan quality as hand-crafted clinical plan. It is capable of capturing human's knowledge in beam selection decision making. This model could facilitate decision making for beam angle selection while eliminating lengthy trial-and-error process of adjusting beam setting during liver SBRT treatment planning.
A review of stereotactic body radiotherapy - is volumetric modulated arc therapy the answer?

Daniel Sapkaroski,Catherine Osborne,Kellie A Knight

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.108

Abstract:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a high precision radiotherapy technique used for the treatment of small to moderate extra-cranial tumours. Early studies utilising SBRT have shown favourable outcomes. However, major disadvantages of static field SBRT include long treatment times and toxicity complications. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may potentially mitigate these disadvantages. This review aims to assess the feasibility of emerging VMAT and IMRT-based SBRT treatment techniques and qualify which offers the best outcome for patients, whilst identifying any emerging and advantageous SBRT planning trends. A review and synthesis of data from current literature up to September 2013 was conducted on EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, Proquest central, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews. Only full text papers comparing VMAT and or IMRT and or Static SBRT were included. Ten papers were identified that evaluated the results of VMAT/IMRT SBRT. Five related to medically inoperable stage 1 and 2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), three to spinal metastasis, one related to abdominal lymph node malignancies, with the final one looking at pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overall treatment times with VMAT were reduced by 66-70% for lung, 46-58% for spine, 42% and 21% for lymph node and pancreatic metastasis respectively, planning constraints were met with several studies showing improved organs at risk sparing with IMRT/VMAT to static SBRT. Both IMRT and VMAT were able to meet all planning constraints in the studies reviewed, with VMAT offering the greatest treatment efficiency. Early clinical outcomes with VMAT and IMRT SBRT have demonstrated excellent local control and favourable survival outcomes.
Optimization of collimator angle combined island blocking with parked gap achieves superior normal tissue sparing in SBRT planning of multiple liver lesions

Maidina Abuduxiku,Xiaoqiang Chen,Shu Zhang,Jiangping Yang,Wenjun Liao,Jianghong Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14267

2024-01-25

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Abstract:Purpose To propose an efficient collimator angle optimization method by combining island blocking (IB) and parked gap (PG) problem to reduce the radiotherapy dose for normal tissue. The reduction will be done with single‐isocenter multi‐lesion volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of liver cancer. Methods A novel collimator angle optimization algorithm was developed based on the two‐dimensional projection of targets on a beam's eye view (BEV) plane as a function of gantry and collimator angle. This optimization algorithm minimized the sum of the combined IB and PG (IB & PG) areas from all gantry angles for each arc. For comparison, two SBRT plans were respectively generated for each of the 20 retrospective liver cancer cases with multiple lesions. One plan was optimized using the IB & PG algorithm, and the other plan was optimized with a previously reported optimization algorithm that only considered the IB area. Plans were then evaluated and compared using typical dosimetric metrics. Results With the comparable target coverage, IB & PG plans had significantly lower D500cc, D700cc, mean dose (Dmean), and V15 of normal liver tissues when compared to IB plans. The median percent reductions were 3.32% to 5.36%. The D1cc, D5cc, and Dmean for duodenum and small intestine in IB & PG plans were significantly reduced in a range from 7.60% up to 16.03%. Similarly, the median integral dose was reduced by 3.73%. Furthermore, the percentage of normal liver Dmean sparing when IB & PG plans compared to IB plans, was found to be positively correlated (ρ = 0.669, P = 0.001) with the inter‐target distance. Conclusion The proposed IB & PG algorithm has been demonstrated to outperform the IB algorithm in almost all normal tissue sparing, and the magnitude of liver sparing was positively correlated with inter‐target distance.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

Kei Ito,Yujiro Nakajima,Kentaro Taguchi,Hiroaki Ogawa,Makoto Saito,Keiko Nemoto Murofushi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122286

2024-06-21

Cancers

Abstract:Purpose: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. Methods: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade ≥ 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. Results: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6–51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1–2 and S1–5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.

oncology
SU-E-T-713: Study On Application of Beam Angle Optimization for Multiple Intracranial Metastases

xiaowen lin,tianhao sun,y yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4925077

IF: 4.506

2015-01-01

Medical Physics

Abstract:Purpose: To study the dosimetric impact of different angle fields IMRT and the feasibility of beam angle optimization (BAO) for multiple intracranial metastases. Methods: 11 patients with multiple intracranial metastases were included in this analysis. In Varian Eclipse TPS two treatment techniques were designed for each patient: the 7 equal spaced fields and 7 fields by beam angle optimization IMRT. Two plans were designed for each patient with the same dose-volume constraints and prescription dose. All plans were normalized to the mean dose to PTV. The dose distribution in the target, the dose to the organs at risk and normal brain tissues and total MU in two techniques were compared to explore the dosimetric differences. Results: For the target dose, conformity and homogeneity in PTV, no statistically differences were observed in the two plans. Compared to 7 equal spaced fields IMRT plans, IMRT plans with BAO reduced the maximum dose to left and right lens by an average of 45%, 37%, the mean dose to left and right eyes were reduced by an average of 42.6%,44.5% .The maximum dose of the right optic nerve and the mean dose of normal brain tissue were reduced by an average of 23%,3% respectively. The above data were statistically significant. IMRT plans with BAO reduced the maximum dose of the brainstem and the optic chiasm, the number of MU, but the Result were not statistically significant (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Compared to 7 equal spaced fields IMRT plans, IMRT plans with BAO showed the similar target dose and reduced the dose of the organs at risk. For multiple intracranial metastases, IMRT plans with BAO were feasible and beneficial.
Selection criteria for circular collimator- vs. Multileaf collimator-based plans in robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases and benign intracranial disease: Impact of target size, shape complexity, and proximity to at-risk organs

Takeshi Takizawa,Satoshi Tanabe,Hisashi Nakano,Satoru Utsunomiya,Katsuya Maruyama,Motoki Kaidu,Hiroyuki Ishikawa,Kiyoshi Onda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104852

IF: 3.119

2024-11-02

Physica Medica

Abstract:Highlights • Selection criteria for circular cone and MLC for CyberKnife SRS were evaluated. • A mathematical score was adapted to assess the quality of the dose distribution. • MLC is recommended when the tumor radius exceeds 7.6 mm in metastatic brain tumors. • In the benign brain tumors, MLC is recommended when the tumor radius exceeds 17.5 mm. • Collimator selection based on these criteria improves plan quality of CyberKnife SRS. Purpose This study aimed to determine the selection criteria for circular collimator (CC)- and multileaf collimator (MLC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) plans for brain metastases (BM) and benign intracranial disease (BID) in terms of geometric parameters using CyberKnife (CK). Methods Forty-eight and eighty-five patients with BM and BID, respectively, were included. Two plans using CC and MLC were created for each case. Six dosimetric parameters and mathematical scores (MS) were extracted from each plan to assess plan quality. Two geometric parameters in BM—equivalent radius (rGTV) and sphericity index (SI) of the gross tumor volume—and three in BID—rGTV, SI, and the distance between the GTV and organ at risk (dOAR)—were calculated. Their effect on the superiority of CC– or MLC-based plans in terms of dosimetric parameters and MS was evaluated using multiple regression analysis. Results The rGTV was associated with improved dosimetric parameters of MLC-based plans, especially the GTV conformity in BM and BID cases (β: 0.70 and 0.51) and the OAR sparing in BM cases (β: 0.82), where β represents the regression coefficient. Based on the MS, where the weights for the GTV coverage and OAR sparing were equal, the thresholds at which the MLC-based plans become comparable or superior to the CC-based plans in BM and BID were rGTV > 7.6 and >17.5 mm, respectively. Meanwhile, SI and dOAR were weakly correlated (β ≤ 0.30). Conclusions In SRS/SRT plans for BM and BID cases using CyberKnife, geometric parameters, especially rGTV, must be considered when selecting CC or MLC.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Contact sensitivity to chlorhexidine?

E. Bechgaard,Ella Ploug,N. Hjorth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02504.x

1985-07-01

Contact Dermatitis

Abstract:In a joint study, 2061 patterns (1346 women and 715 men) were patch tested with chlorhexidine gluconate 1% in Water. included in a standard lest series. 4H patients (2.3%) showed a positive reaction. These were relatively marc common in men (3.2%) than in women (1.9%), Positive reactions were most common in patients with leg eczema (6.8%) or leg ulcer (10.9%). Of the 48 patients who were patch test positive. 14 (2 with leg ulcer) were retested with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.01 and 1%. Only one with a leg ulcer was positive. These findings indicate that false positive reactions, known as “the incited skin syndrome”, may arise from testing eczema patients in a standard series The sensitizing potential of chlorhexidine may be very low, but the potential in patients with an eczema or ulcer of the leg has to be further evaluated.
Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

Ke Sheng,Minsong Cao,Andrew Godley,Mu-Han Lin,Lukas Henze,Laura Hammond,Laurence Delombaerde,Kirsten Hierholz,Jana Kouptsidis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101570

2024-07-14

Abstract:Purpose: Noncoplanar beams and arcs are routinely used to improve dosimetry for intracranial cases, but their application for extracranial cases has been hampered by the risk of collision. This has led to conservative beam selection whose impact on plan dosimetry has not been previously studied. Methods and materials: A full-body 3-dimensional patient surface was acquired using optical cameras for a single lung patient at the time of computed tomography simulation. Eight stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans were created for the patient, with varying degrees of noncoplanarity and deliverability. The plans included volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans ranging from simple, coplanar arcs to multiple noncoplanar arcs and IMRT beams. A total of 70 fields were created across the 8 plans, of which 21 fields were undeliverable with a 5-cm buffer. Organs-at-risk (OARs) metrics including R50, Dmax 2 cm from the PTV, lung V20, and chest wall V30 were evaluated. Five expert SBRT dosimetrists from 5 institutions evaluated field deliverability, with or without the guidance of the clearance map. Results: In the dosimetry evaluation, a clear trend in increasing dosimetric compactness and OAR sparing is observed with increasing plan noncoplanarity. R50, Dmax 2 cm, lung V20, and chest wall V30 decreased 41%, 39%, 43%, and 57%, respectively, from plan 1 (2 coplanar partial arcs) to plan 8 (19 noncoplanar IMRT beams). In the observer tests, the expert dosimetrists' ability to accurately discern beam deliverability because of collision significantly increases with the clearance map. The errors in predicting colliding fields were eliminated using the whole-body surface and clearance map, and the user was able to select fields based on plan quality and patient comfort instead of being overly conservative. Conclusion: The study shows that incorporating a personalized, whole-body clearance map in the treatment planning workflow can facilitate the adoption of noncoplanar beams or arcs that benefit the SBRT plan dosimetry.
Dosimetric Factors Of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Isolated Spinal Metastatic Diseases: Impact Of Distance From Tumor Target To Spinal Cord On Planning Dosimetry And Low Dose Spillage Restriction

Hao Yang,Xiaohu Cong,Boning Cai,Xiaoshen Wang,Wei Xu,Jinyuan Wang,Jun Yang,Haixia Liu,Shouping Xu,Zhongjian Ju,Lin Ma

2016-01-01

Abstract:Background: This study evaluated the impact of the distance from planning target volume (PTV) to spinal cord on planning dosimetry of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with isolated spine metastasis and established planning criteria and parameters to restricting low dose spillage. Methods: Six modified PTVs from each of 10 patients with isolated spinal metastasis were created by artificial uniform extension from clinical target volume (CTV) to ensure a minimum PTV-to-cord distance of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm; respectively. The prescription dose (PD) was 22 Gy in a single fraction. PTV dosimetric parameters including V-100, D-min, D-98, D-95, D-1, conformity index (CI), R-50% (ratio of the 50% prescription isodose volume to the PTV), D-2 cm (maximum dose in percentage of PD at 2 cm from PTV in any direction), and cord dose were measured and compared. Results: PTV V-100, D-min, D-98, D-95 were enhanced markedly along with the increase of the PTV-to-cord distance, with a significant difference. PTV CI, R-50%, D-2 cm, and cord dose were not statistically significant in different PTV-to-cord distances. A PTV-to-cord distance of 2 to 3 mm meet PTV D-min, D-98, D-95. R-50%, and D-2 cm could restrict low dose spillage in SRS panning. Conclusions: PTV V-100, D-min, D-98, D-95 are directly correlated with PTV-to-cord distance for spine SBRT in single fraction. A distance of 2 to 3 mm from PTV to spinal cord meets planning dose requirements. R-50% and D-2 cm can quantitatively restrict low dose spillage and improve plan quality.

[Dimensions of suicide].

Personalized selection of unequal sub-arc collimator angles in VMAT for multiple brain metastases

Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Using Multicriteria Optimization for Body and Extremity Sarcoma.

Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases

Characteristics of European family and household systems.

Dosimetric advantages of dual arc increments for head and neck volumetric‐modulated arc therapy in the Monaco treatment planning system

Dosimetric Evaluations of Different Accelerator Based Treatment Modalities for Curative Intent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Isolated Thoracic Spinal Metastases

Effect of the Collimator Angle on Dosimetric Verification of the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases.

Expression of interleukin 1 receptors is restricted to the L3T4+ subset of mature T lymphocytes.

Evaluation of six portable blood glucose meters for measuring blood glucose concentration in dogs.

Dosimetric comparison of commonly used volumetric modulated arc therapy field arrangements based on flattening filter-free beams for synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma radiotherapy

A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

A review of stereotactic body radiotherapy - is volumetric modulated arc therapy the answer?

Optimization of collimator angle combined island blocking with parked gap achieves superior normal tissue sparing in SBRT planning of multiple liver lesions

Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

SU-E-T-713: Study On Application of Beam Angle Optimization for Multiple Intracranial Metastases

Selection criteria for circular collimator- vs. Multileaf collimator-based plans in robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases and benign intracranial disease: Impact of target size, shape complexity, and proximity to at-risk organs

Contact sensitivity to chlorhexidine?

Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

Dosimetric Factors Of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Isolated Spinal Metastatic Diseases: Impact Of Distance From Tumor Target To Spinal Cord On Planning Dosimetry And Low Dose Spillage Restriction