Abstract:Background: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has increasingly replaced traditional reconstruction methods in computed tomography (CT). The next paradigm shift in image reconstruction is likely to come from artificial intelligence, with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) solutions already entering the clinic. An enduring disadvantage to IR has been a change in noise texture, which can affect diagnostic confidence. DLR has demonstrated the potential to overcome this issue and has recently become available for dual-energy CT. Purpose: To evaluate the spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a commercially available DLR algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen and compare it to single-energy (SE) CT. Methods: An oval 25 cm x 35 cm custom-made phantom was scanned on a GE Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) at two dose levels (13 and 5 mGy) and two iodine concentrations (8 and 2 mg/mL), using three typical abdominal scan protocols: dual-energy (DE), SE 80 kV (SE-80 kV) and SE 120 kV (SE-120 kV). Reconstructions were performed with three strengths of IR (ASiR-V: AR0%, AR50%, AR100%) and three strengths of DLR (TrueFidelity: low, medium, high). The DE acquisitions were reconstructed as mono-energetic images between 40 and 80 keV. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were determined for the reconstructions following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 233. Results: Noise magnitude reductions (relative to AR0%) for the SE protocols were on average (-29%, -21%) for (AR50%, TF-M), while for DE-70 keV were (-28%, -43%). There was less reduction in mean frequency (fav ) for DLR than for IR, with similar results for SE and DE imaging. There was, however, a substantial change in the NPS shape when using DE with DLR, quantifiable by a marked reduction in the peak frequency (fpeak ) that was absent in SE mode. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) exhibited slight to moderate shifts towards lower spatial frequencies at the lower dose (<12% in fav ). Spatial resolution was consistently superior for DLR compared to IR for SE but not for DE. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) showed decreased resolution with reduced dose and iodine concentration, with less decrease for DLR compared to IR. DLR displayed a higher d' than IR. The effect of energy was large: d' increased with lower keV, and SE-80 kV had higher d' than SE-120 kV. Using DE with DLR could provide higher d' than SE-80 kV at the higher dose but not at lower dose. Conclusions: DE imaging with DLR maintained spatial resolution and reduced noise magnitude while displaying less change in noise texture than IR. The d' was also higher with DLR than IR, suggesting superiority in detectability of iodinated contrast. Despite these trends being consistent with those previously established for SE imaging, there were some noteworthy differences. For DE imaging there was no improvement in resolution compared to IR and a change in noise texture. DE imaging with low keV and DLR had superior detectability to SE DLR at the high dose but was not better than SE-80 kV at low dose.

Advances in spatial resolution and radiation dose reduction using super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography: A phantom study

Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction for cardiac CT: impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on task-based image quality

Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study

Improvement of Spatial Resolution on Coronary CT Angiography by Using Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study

Super-resolution deep learning image reconstruction: image quality and myocardial homogeneity in coronary computed tomography angiography

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study

Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

Spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study

Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study

Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures

Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Evaluation of four computed tomography reconstruction algorithms using a coronary artery phantom

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

Lifelike PixelPrint phantoms for assessing clinical image quality and dose reduction capabilities of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.