Abstract:Background Recently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep‐learning‐based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels. Purpose To assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction (AI‐DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications. Methods Acquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU‐41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol: 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI‐DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task‐based transfer function, and detectability index (d′) were computed: d′‐modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low‐contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground‐glass opacity (GGO), or high‐contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four‐ or five‐point scale. Results From Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: −66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and −63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: −35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and −13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d′) of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low‐contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high‐contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d′ values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required. Conclusion With AI‐DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Advances in spatial resolution and radiation dose reduction using super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography: A phantom study

Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction for cardiac CT: impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on task-based image quality

Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study

Improvement of Spatial Resolution on Coronary CT Angiography by Using Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study

Super-resolution deep learning image reconstruction: image quality and myocardial homogeneity in coronary computed tomography angiography

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study

Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

Contact angle hysteresis generated by strong dilute defects.

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study

Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study

Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures

Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Evaluation of four computed tomography reconstruction algorithms using a coronary artery phantom

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

Lifelike PixelPrint phantoms for assessing clinical image quality and dose reduction capabilities of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.