Abstract:Background Workplace microaggressions are a longstanding but understudied problem in the surgical specialties. Microaggressions in healthcare are linked to negative emotional and physical health outcomes and can contribute to burnout and suboptimal delivery of patient care. They also negatively impact recruitment, retention and promotion, which often results in attrition. Further attrition at the time of an impending surgical workforce shortage risks compromising delivery of health care to the diverse US population and may jeopardize the financial stability of health care organizations. To date, studies on microaggressions have consisted of small focus groups comprised of women faculty or trainees at a single institution. There are no large, multi-organizational, gender-inclusive studies on microaggressions experienced by practicing surgeons. Objective(s) To examine the demographic and occupational characteristics of surgeons who do and do not report experiencing workplace microaggressions and whether these experiences would influence a decision to pursue a career in surgery again. Study Design We developed and internally validated a web-based survey to assess surgeon experiences with microaggressions and associated sequelae. The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of nine American College of Surgeons (ACS) online Communities from November 2022 to January 2023. All ACS Communities comprised members who had completed residency or fellowship training and had experience in the surgical workforce. The survey contained demographic, occupational, and validated microaggression items. Analyses include descriptive and chi-squared statistics, t-tests, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results The survey was completed by 377 ACS members with the following characteristics: working as a surgeon (80.9%), non-Hispanic white (71.8%), general surgeons (71.0%), age ≥ 50 years (67.4%), fellowship-trained (61.0%), and women (58.4%). A total of 254 (67.4%) respondents reported experiencing microaggressions. Younger surgeons (p=0.002), women (p<0.001) and fellowship-trained surgeons (p=0.001) were more likely to report experiencing microaggressions than their counterparts. Surgeons working in academic medical centers or healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities were more likely to experience microaggressions than those in private practice (p<0.01). Surgeons currently working as a surgeon or those who are unable to work reported more experience with microaggressions (p=0.003). There was no difference in microaggressions experienced among respondents by surgical specialties, race/ethnicity, or for surgeons with a self-reported disability. In multivariable logistic regression, women had higher odds of experiencing microaggressions than men [aOR 15.9; 95% C.I.: 7.7-32.8] and surgeons in private practice had significantly lower odds of experiencing microaggressions compared to surgeons in academic medicine (aOR 0.3; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) or in healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities (aOR 0.2; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.6). Among surgeons responding to an online survey, respondents reporting microaggressions were less likely to say they would choose a career in surgery again (p<0.001). Conclusions Surgeons reporting experience with microaggressions reflect the diversification of surgical specialties and subspecialties. With continued expansion of surgeon gender and race/ethnicity representation, deliberate efforts to address and eliminate workplace microaggressions could have broad implications for improving recruitment and retention of surgeons.

Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs

Conscientious Objection to Providing Gender Health Care in Pediatric Training: Balancing the Vulnerability of Transgender Youth and the Vulnerability of Pediatric Residents

Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study

Perceptions and Understanding of Transgender Patient Care: A Survey of Practicing Facial Plastic Surgeons

Conscientious Objection and the Anesthesiologist: An Ethical Dilemma

Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations

Preferences and Barriers of Male Patients Seeking Aesthetic Procedures

Physicians' Obligation to Disclose Comparative Surgical Outcomes: Distinctive Features of Facial Feminization Surgery

(347) A Single Center Review of Access to Gender Affirming Surgical Care: Analysis of Consultation to Surgery Conversion Rates and Patient Wait Times

Obstetrics and Gynecology residency training in transgender care: a national survey of residents and program directors

Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study

Pregnancy and Parenthood Among US Surgical Residents

Impact of Policy Changes and Program Support on Family Planning Goals among Plastic Surgery Trainees

TransCare Initiative: An Institutional Knowledge-to-Action Project for Surgery and Gender Equity Education

Resident Selection Protocols in Plastic Surgery: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors

Cross sectional survey of Ob/Gyn residents' graduated experience with robotic surgery

Comparison of Male and Female Surgeons' Experiences With Gender Across 5 Qualitative/Quantitative Domains

Family Planning Among Canadian Plastic Surgeons and Trainees

Workplace Microaggressions: Results of a Survey of the American College of Surgeons Members

Understanding Conscientious Objection and the Acceptability of its Practice in Primary Care

Gender-Affirming Surgery in Persons with Gender Dysphoria