Pregnancy complications and loss: an observational survey comparing anesthesiologists and obstetrician–gynecologists
Natalie R. BarnettRenuka M. GeorgeKatherine H. HatterNorah R. JanosySamantha J. VizziniShubhangi SinghRebecca E. LeeBethany J. WolfCamila CabreraAmy L. Duhachek-StapelmanDaniel Katza Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,SC,USAb Department of Anesthesiology,University of Colorado,Children's Hospital Colorado,Aurora,CO,USAc Department of Anesthesiology,University of Virginia,Charlottesville,VA,USAd Department of Anesthesiology,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USAe Department of Anesthesiology,Perioperative and Pain Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,NY,USAf Department of Public Health Sciences,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,SC,USAg Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,NY,USAh Department of Anesthesiology,University of Nebraska Medical Center,Omaha,NE,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2311072
2024-02-09
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Abstract:Objective While there is increasing information regarding the occupational risks to pregnant physicians, there is inconsistent and limited subspecialty data. Physicians may be at increased risk for pregnancy complications due to occupational exposure, long work hours, nightshifts, and physical/mental demands. Additionally, little is known regarding the education physicians receive pertaining to pregnancy risks respective to their specialties as well as departmental/institutional support for pregnancy loss or complication. Therefore, a survey was developed and distributed across multiple academic sites to ascertain if there is an inherent occupation-associated risk of pregnancy complication(s) and/or pregnancy loss for anesthesiologists (ANES) when compared to obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYN).
obstetrics & gynecology