Abstract:Objective: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) appointed a committee of leaders from the ACS, Association of Program Directors in Surgery, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and American Board of Surgery to define key challenges facing surgery resident training programs and to explore solutions. The committee wanted to solicit the perspectives of surgery resident program directors (PDs) given their pivotal role in residency training. Design: Two surveys were developed, pilot tested, and administered to PDs following Institutional Review Board approval. PDs from 247 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery programs were randomized to receive 1 of the 2 surveys. Bias analyses were conducted, and adjusted Pearson χ2 tests were used to test for differences in response patterns by program type and size. Setting: All accredited general surgery programs in the United States were included in the sampling frame of the survey; 10 programs with initial or withdrawn accreditation were excluded from the sampling frame. Participants: A total of 135 PDs responded, resulting in a 54.7% response rate (Survey A: n = 67 and Survey B: n = 68). The respondent sample was determined to be representative of program type and size. Results: Nearly 52% of PD responses were from university-based programs, and 41% had over 6 residents per graduating cohort. More than 61% of PDs reported that, compared to 10 years ago, both entering and graduating residents are less prepared in technical skills. PDs expressed significant concerns regarding the effect of duty-hour restrictions on the overall preparation of graduating residents (61%) and quality of patient care (57%). The current 5-year training structure was viewed as needing a significant or extensive increase in opportunities for resident autonomy (63%), and the greatest barriers to resident autonomy were viewed to be patient preferences not to be cared for by residents (68%), liability concerns (68%), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations (65%). Although 64% of PDs believe that moderate or significant changes are needed in the current structure of residency training, 35% believe that no changes in the structure are needed. When asked for their 1 best recommendation regarding the structure of surgical residency, only 22% of PDs selected retaining the current 5-year structure. The greatest percentage of PDs (28%) selected the "4 + 2" model as their 1 best recommendation for the structure to be used. In the area of faculty development, 56% of PDs supported a significant or extensive increase in Train the Teacher programs, and 41% supported a significant or extensive increase in faculty certification in education. Conclusions: Information regarding the valuable perspectives of PDs gathered through these surveys should help in implementing important changes in residency training and faculty development. These efforts will need to be pursued collaboratively with involvement of key stakeholders, including the organizations represented on this ACS committee.

Resident Selection Protocols in Plastic Surgery: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors

Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents

Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Survey: Characteristics of Successful Applicants and Feedback about the Interview Process

A survey of current state of training of plastic surgery residents

Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicant Review: Important Factors and Selection Criteria

How Important Are Dedicated Research Years and Global Health to Applicants in Plastic Surgery?

Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Trends and Comparison With Other Surgical Specialties

Job Satisfaction Among Plastic Surgery Residents in Canada

Evaluating Plastic Surgery Resident Satisfaction Globally: Predictors and Recommendations for Training Enhancement

The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions

"Taking Training to the Next Level": The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey

Comparing Graduating Plastic Surgery Residents' Case Logs With Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Requirements, Content at National Meetings, and In-Service Examination Test Items

Exposure to plastic surgery during undergraduate medical training: A single-institution review

Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study

Characteristics of Successful Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants from US Allopathic Medical Schools without a Home Integrated Program

A survey of criteria used to evaluate applications for small animal surgery residency positions

Differential factors that influence applicant selection of a prosthodontic residency program

Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine as Plastic Surgery Residents: Demographics, Credentials, and Pathways to Residency

Exploring the 6-year Trend in Dedicated Research Years among Integrated Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Residents

Identification, Characterization, and Ranking of Candidate Metrics for Selection to Anesthesiology Residency: An Iterative Survey of Program Directors

Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program