REPLY TO ANGELO : CLIMATE CHANGE AND SPECIES LOSS IN

Harles,W. G.,Illis,D. C.,Avis

Abstract:Our research has identified that climate change has been responsible for shaping the pattern of species loss in Concord, Massachusetts, USA (Willi s et al. 2008). In particular, we identified that closely related species (i.e., clades) that are less phenologically responsive to both longand shortterm changes in climate have declined in abundance. Phenologic al change has long been known to be a key indicator of species response to climate change (F itt r & Fitter 2002; Walther et al. 2002; Parmesan & Yohe 2003; Visser & Both 2005) and is believed to ha ve important consequences for the success of species (Cleland et al. 2012; Cahill et al. 2013) . In a recent critique of our work, Angelo (2014) called into question the main conclusion of our study on tw grounds: i) our estimates of species loss in Concord are inaccurate, and ii) it is unlikely that climate change has significantly impacted species loss given the myriad of additional facto rs hat effect species in suburban communities like Concord (e.g., reforestation, land-use c hange, non-native species, and increased deer herbivory). We believe that Angelo’s critique of our stud y is based on a misunderstanding of our methods and conclusions. Here, we explicitly address his crit que and reiterate that our results and conclusions are sound. Our response is focused specifically on the critique of Willis et al. (2008) because this is the study for which we performed the bulk of the analyses, interpretation, and writing.