Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection improved cumulative live birth rate for cycles with second polar body extrusion rate <50% in young women: generalized addictive model

Xiaolei Chen,Yanan Wang,Chaoyan Yang,Cheng Li,Changjian Yin,Maoning Zhao,Keliang Wu,Han Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.09.017
2024-09-11
Abstract:Objective: To determine the indications for early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) application. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: A center for reproductive medicine. Patient(s): The study included 19,808 patients who underwent conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or rescue ICSI for their first cycles between February 2017 and December 2021. Intervention(s): Rescue ICSI cycles constituted the study group, where oocytes that had not extruded the second polar body 4-6 hours after insemination were rescued by ICSI. The control group consisted of conventional IVF cycles with no interventions to rescue oocytes without the second polar body. Generalized additive models were constructed to describe the relationship between the second polar body extrusion rate and cumulative live birth rate in conventional IVF and rescue ICSI cycles, respectively. The cutoff value of the second polar body extrusion rate guiding rescue ICSI application was determined from the intersection point of generalized additive models. Maternal age range applicable to rescue ICSI was further analyzed using the same method. Clinical outcomes were compared between conventional IVF and rescue ICSI cycles across different second polar body extrusion rate and maternal age subgroups. Main outcome measure(s): The second polar body extrusion rate and maternal age range for rescue ICSI application, normal fertilization rate, and cumulative live birth rate. Result(s): Generalized additive models showed that the cutoff value for the second polar body extrusion rate about rescue ICSI application was 50%. When the rate <50%, normal fertilization rate and cumulative live birth rate (63.7% vs. 46.1%; odds ratio, 1.609; 95% confidence interval, 1.276-2.030) were significantly higher in rescue ICSI cycles than conventional IVF cycles. When the rate ≥50%, rescue ICSI cycles had similar normal fertilization rate and cumulative live birth rate compared with conventional IVF cycles. Further analysis on maternal age in cycles with second polar body extrusion rate <50% released that rescue ICSI cycles showed a higher cumulative live birth rate (67.7% vs. 48.3%; odds ratio, 1.732; 95% confidence interval, 1.361-2.202) than conventional IVF cycles for women aged <38 years. Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization cycles with second polar body extrusion rate <50% in women aged <38 years was applicable to early rescue ICSI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?