Abstract:Background context: Care for low back pain (LBP) is costly, fragmented and, in non-compensation populations, rarely specifically addresses factors associated with maintaining employment status or return to work (RTW). Purpose: This study aimed to identify modifiable independent risk factors for (1) a negative work status at presentation and (2) a change in work status during treatment in a cohort of LBP patients. The results are intended to inform improvement in best-evidence care pathways to maximize societal outcomes and overall value of a new model of care. Study design/setting: A prospective observational study was carried out. Inclusion criteria: Work-eligible, non-workers compensation patients with recurrent or persistent LBP ≥6 weeks and ≤12 months. Setting: The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC)-a novel Government-funded shared-care model of management for LBP. Methods: This study used the following methods: (1) Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the initial ISAEC consultation (t0) from December 2012 to April 2014. Work status at t0 was dichotomized as employed (E) or underemployed (UE; unemployed, modified work duty, or disability). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine independent predictors of UE status at t0. (2) Bivariate analysis of longitudinal data from t0 to 6 months (t1) to identify risk factors for work status change. Employment journey categorized into four groups: Et0/Et1-employed at t0 and employed at t1; Et0/UEt1-employed at t0 and underemployed at t1; UEt0/Et1-underemployed at t0 and employed at t1; UEt0/UEt1-underemployed at t0 and underemployed at t1. Results: This study yielded the following results: (1) Initial consultation data on 462 consecutive patients (Et0=344, UEt0=118). Multivariate logistic regression identified legal claim, depression, smoking, and higher STarT Back (or Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) score as independent risk factors for UEt0. (2) Overall UE rate did not significantly change during longitudinal analysis (n=178, UEt0=25.5%, UEt1=22.9%). However, 10.5% of Et0 became UEt1 (Et0/Et1=102, Et0/UEt1=12). Bivariate analysis identified elevated baseline ODI score as the only significant predictor variable for UEt1 in Et0 cohort (p=.0101). Conversely, ISAEC improved the employment status in 41% of UEt0 to Et1 (UEt0/Et1=16, UEt0/UEt1=23), and the absence of depression was significant for predicting RTW (p=.0001). Conclusions: From a societal perspective, employment status as an outcome measure is paramount in assessing the value of a new model of care for LBP. Mitigation strategies for the predictor variables identified will be included in ISAEC pathways to translate clinical improvement into societal added value.

A note on using the workability index (WAI) to predict future earnings capacity losses in moderate to severe partial disability cases

Estimating time to reinjury among Washington State injured workers by degree of permanent impairment: Using state wage data to adjust for time at risk

A Cross-Sectional/Retrospective Assessment of the Questionnaire

The assessment of capacity limitations in psychiatric work disability evaluations by the social functioning scale Mini-ICF-APP

Work Ability Index: Psychometric Testing in Aeronautical Industry Workers

The Added Value of Collecting Information on Pain Experience When Predicting Time on Benefits for Injured Workers with Back Pain

[Assement of incapacity to work and the Mini-ICF-APP]

Predictive validity of general work ability assessments in the context of sickness insurance

Work Ability After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Followed by a Structured Postoperative Rehabilitation: Secondary Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Multi-Centre Trial with a 2-year Follow-up

Administration and application of the Worker Role Interview: looking beyond functional capacity

Predictive validity of a functional capacity evaluation: The physical work performance evaluation

Association between clinician-assessed lifting ability and workplace tolerance and patient self-reported pain and disability following work conditioning

The importance of identifying and modifying unemployment predictor variables in the evolution of a novel model of care for low back pain in the general population

The adequacy of workplace accommodation and the incidence of permanent employment separations after a disabling work injury or illness

Physical, social and emotional function after work accidents: A medicolegal perspective

Bridging a Gap in the Workers' Compensation System: A Scale Development and Validation of an Employee Workers' Compensation Experience Scale

WORK ABILITY PREDICTS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-RELATED ABSENTEEISM IN PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS: A 1-YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Development of a prognostic score for work disability in Romanian patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Content validity and utility of the Assessment of Work Performance (AWP)

Predictive value of the DASH tool for predicting return to work of injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity

ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: Results of the icfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries