Abstract:Background context: Care for low back pain (LBP) is costly, fragmented and, in non-compensation populations, rarely specifically addresses factors associated with maintaining employment status or return to work (RTW). Purpose: This study aimed to identify modifiable independent risk factors for (1) a negative work status at presentation and (2) a change in work status during treatment in a cohort of LBP patients. The results are intended to inform improvement in best-evidence care pathways to maximize societal outcomes and overall value of a new model of care. Study design/setting: A prospective observational study was carried out. Inclusion criteria: Work-eligible, non-workers compensation patients with recurrent or persistent LBP ≥6 weeks and ≤12 months. Setting: The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC)-a novel Government-funded shared-care model of management for LBP. Methods: This study used the following methods: (1) Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the initial ISAEC consultation (t0) from December 2012 to April 2014. Work status at t0 was dichotomized as employed (E) or underemployed (UE; unemployed, modified work duty, or disability). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine independent predictors of UE status at t0. (2) Bivariate analysis of longitudinal data from t0 to 6 months (t1) to identify risk factors for work status change. Employment journey categorized into four groups: Et0/Et1-employed at t0 and employed at t1; Et0/UEt1-employed at t0 and underemployed at t1; UEt0/Et1-underemployed at t0 and employed at t1; UEt0/UEt1-underemployed at t0 and underemployed at t1. Results: This study yielded the following results: (1) Initial consultation data on 462 consecutive patients (Et0=344, UEt0=118). Multivariate logistic regression identified legal claim, depression, smoking, and higher STarT Back (or Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) score as independent risk factors for UEt0. (2) Overall UE rate did not significantly change during longitudinal analysis (n=178, UEt0=25.5%, UEt1=22.9%). However, 10.5% of Et0 became UEt1 (Et0/Et1=102, Et0/UEt1=12). Bivariate analysis identified elevated baseline ODI score as the only significant predictor variable for UEt1 in Et0 cohort (p=.0101). Conversely, ISAEC improved the employment status in 41% of UEt0 to Et1 (UEt0/Et1=16, UEt0/UEt1=23), and the absence of depression was significant for predicting RTW (p=.0001). Conclusions: From a societal perspective, employment status as an outcome measure is paramount in assessing the value of a new model of care for LBP. Mitigation strategies for the predictor variables identified will be included in ISAEC pathways to translate clinical improvement into societal added value.

Development of a prognostic score for work disability in Romanian patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)

Factors influencing health status and disability of patients with ankylosing spondylitis in the Czech Republic

Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

Thresholds for unacceptable work state in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis of four presenteeism and two clinical outcome measurement instruments

Predicting risk for radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis: comparative analysis of the multi-biomarker disease activity score and conventional measures of disease activity in multiple studies

Reliability and validity of Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery

Poor work outcomes in patients with spondyloarthritis: causes, consequences, and solutions

Does participation in interdisciplinary work rehabilitation programme influence return to work obstacles and predictive factors?

The investigation of work disability of rheumatoid arthritis patients

Work participation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: high prevalence of negative workplace experiences and long-term work impairment

ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: Results of the icfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Disability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using IBD Disk in a Tertiary Center from Romania

CT-based comprehensive scoring system for assessing hip arthropathy in ankylosing spondylitis: feasibility study with clinical correlation

Predictive factors for 1-year and 5-year outcome for disability in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in primary care

Finalisation and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, a patient-derived composite measure of impact of rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR initiative

The importance of identifying and modifying unemployment predictor variables in the evolution of a novel model of care for low back pain in the general population

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score

Screening for osteoporosis in people with MS: A new risk score

The Romanian Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients (EARP) Questionnaire, Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), and Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen 2 (ToPAS 2)