Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain
Sara Domínguez-Salas,Carmen Rodríguez-Domínguez,Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero,Regina Allande-Cussó,Juan Jesús García-Iglesias,Juan Gómez-Salgado
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S387242
IF: 3.974
2022-11-30
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Sara Domínguez-Salas, 1 Carmen Rodríguez-Domínguez, 1 Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero, 1 Regina Allande-Cussó, 2 Juan Jesús García-Iglesias, 3 Juan Gómez-Salgado 3, 4 1 Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas, Seville, Spain; 2 Department of Nursing, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; 3 Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain; 4 Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador Correspondence: Carmen Rodríguez-Domínguez, Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avenida de las Universidades s/n, Dos Hermanas, Seville, 41007, Spain, Tel +34 955 641 600 (Ext. 2625), Email Purpose: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the working, personal and health conditions of health professionals has been highlighted, although it is necessary to verify whether certain instruments used in research on this topic have sufficient psychometric support for their use. This need was the main motivation for undertaking the present study. We aimed to analyse the psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a sample of active health care workers during the pandemic. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2020 with 2326 active health care workers (78.7% women). The instruments that were applied included the UWES-9 scale, the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13), the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and an item on self-perceived health. Results: The three-factor structure related to the correlation of pairs of errors presented the best fit. The reliability of the UWES-9 was highlighted by the adequate internal consistency of the items, the existence of invariance according to gender, and its convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusion: The findings of this work support the use of the UWES-9 to assess the work engagement of health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify it as an adequate measure of this psychological variable and the constructs that comprise it. Keywords: gender invariance, UWES-9, engagement, health care professionals, COVID-19, psychometric The global labour market has suffered a considerable shock since the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, and the impacts have varied among economic sectors, geographical areas, and labour sectors. 1 The pandemic has affected other work aspects and organizations. Thus, among the workers that experienced the most significant impact of the pandemic on their working, personal and health conditions, health personnel undoubtedly stand out. They were positioned in the front line against COVID-19 and faced a high risk of infection due to intense and long work hours, psychological discomfort, exhaustion, and fatigue, among other factors. 2 Research conducted throughout the pandemic showed the impact on the mental health of health professionals, especially female health workers, providing evidence of the anxiety, depression, worry, sleep disorders and stress that they experienced. 3,4 A variable that has been related to the state of mental health in the work environment during the COVID-19 crisis is work engagement (WE). 5 This construct refers to "a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being that can be seen as the antipode of job burnout". 6 It is conceived as a persistent affective-cognitive state that is related to three concepts: Vigour, or high levels of energy, will and mental resistance; Dedication, or feeling enthusiastic about and challenged at work; and Absorption, that is, full and exclusive concentration on the tasks to be performed. 7 To measure this construct, a self-report questionnaire was designed: the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). The UWES initially consisted of 24 items (UWES-24) answered with a seven-point response scale. However, after a psychometric evaluation with two types of samples (university students and Spanish workers), items were reduced to 17 (UWES-17). 7,8 The authors concluded that the three-factor structure adequately fit the data of both samples, although a high correlation was detected between the latent factors, especially between vigour and absorption. 7 Since the publication of this scale, which is available in 21 languages, proposals for shorter versions have emerged, including that of a nine-item version, the UWES-9. 9–11 The UWES-9 scale has been widely used in the scientific literature with samples from several countries worldwide: Europe, Asia, Africa, the Americas and Oceania.<s -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary