Abstract:The welcome development of the veterinary humanities, and veterinary anthropology specifically, raises the question of its potential relationship with the now well-established field(s) of the medical humanities, and of medical anthropology. Although there are national variations, the term “medical humanities” generally refers to either the tapping of the humanities to improve medical education by developing, through engagement with the humanities like literature and visual art, skills in empathy, visualization and expressivity, or alternatively, it refers to the application of humanities approaches of cultural critique to the presumptions, practices and institutions of the human medical world to denaturalize the ideologies of knowledge that contemporary human medicine professions depend upon. This article reflects on the potential impact that the development of a veterinary medical humanities could have on the field of (human) medical humanities and vice versa. Could such a development force a re-conception of notions of agency, of consent, and of the position of “patient” when the (human based) medical humanities is expanded to include both human and veterinary medicine? What would the potential usefulness, or limitations, both in conceptual and in applied terms, be of constructing a multi-species notion of “medical humanities?” What can such a comparative approach offer to veterinary medicine, in practice and in terms of the curricula of veterinary training? To reflect on these questions, this article draws on my multiple years of fieldwork in veterinary clinics and classrooms to first lay out the constituent components of the formal practice of contemporary veterinary medicine (at least in the U.S.) in terms of the roles that species specificity and relations to humans play in the delivery of care, and then seeks to center the animal in these practices to ask questions about consent, resistance, veterinary obligation, and the role of finance in comparison with human medicine. These similarities and differences will form the basis for a consideration of the effects of enlarging the medical humanities to encompass more than one species.

Allies, Advocates, and Accomplices in Veterinary Medicine

How to be an effective ally

Beginning with the End in Mind: Creating a Practice that Centers Equity-Part 2

Beginning with the End in Mind: Creating a Practice that Centers Equity-Part 1

When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action

Human–Animal Relationships and Social Work: Opportunities Beyond the Veterinary Environment

Utilising interpersonal skills to manage challenging client behaviour

One Profession, Multiple Identities: On the Implications of Intersectionality in Veterinary Medicine

The EThIC Model of Virtue-Based Allyship Development: A New Approach to Equity and Inclusion in Organizations

Editorial: Allyship—Not the Solution, But a Way Forward

Inter-Professional Practice: From Veterinarian to the Veterinary Team

There is something about oppression: Allies' perspectives on challenges in relationships with experts by experience

Best Practice in Supporting Professional Identity Formation: Use of a Professional Reasoning Framework

Challenges in Intercultural Communication

Inclusive Mentorship for the Next Generation of Veterinary Professionals

The Need for Diverse Leadership in Veterinary Medicine

Medicine, Value, and Knowledge in the Veterinary Clinic: Questions for and From Medical Anthropology and the Medical Humanities

Assessing Cultural, Religious, and Trauma Influences in Human-Animal Interactions for Effective Animal-Assisted Counseling

Assuring the Groundwork for Success: Mentorship, Sponsorship, and Allyship for Practicing Anesthesiologists

Access to veterinary care: evaluating working definitions, barriers, and implications for animal welfare

Defining Terms Used for Animals Working in Support Roles for People with Support Needs