Abstract:Auditory and motor systems interact in processing auditory rhythms. This study investigated the effect of intuitive body movement, such as head nodding or foot tapping, on listeners’ ability to entrain to the pulse of an auditory sequence. A pulse-finding task was employed using an isochronous sequence of tones in which tones were omitted at pseudorandom positions. Musicians and non-musicians identified their subjectively fitting pulse either using periodic body movement or through listening only. The identified pulse was measured subsequently by finger tapping. Movement appeared to assist pulse extraction especially for non-musicians. The chosen pulse tempi tended to be faster with movement. Additionally, movement led to higher synchronization stabilities of the produced pulse along the sequence, regardless of musical training. These findings demonstrated the facilitatory role of body movement in entraining to auditory rhythms and its interaction with musical training. Introduction Imagine sitting in a live jazz concert: the listeners feel immersed in the music and start intuitively to move along with different parts of their body. The same is seen in the musicians: they automatically move their head or tap their feet in a periodic manner while playing some rhythmically engaging passages. Even in a classical concert where excessive gestures are not encouraged by convention, we often observe musicians rhythmically moving some parts of their body that are not engaged in playing the instruments, along with the music. Moving one’s body periodically to the music, be it foot tapping or head nodding, is a frequent manifestation in listeners as well as in performing musicians. It presents a common example of audio–motor crosstalk in experiencing musical rhythms, and poses an interesting question about the nature of rhythm perception: do we move only because we react to the rhythm we hear, or does the movement itself contribute to the process of hearing the rhythm? Perception and action are believed to share common representational mechanisms through which they interact (Prinz, 1997). Neurophysiological studies on rhythm perception have also concurred that processing auditory rhythms engages both auditory and motor areas of the brain (Chen, Penhune, & Zatorre, 2008b; Grahn & Brett, 2007; Bengtsson et al., 2009), and the motor system can be crucial in this act (Grahn & Brett, 2009). A direct behavioral link between ‘hearing the rhythm’ and ‘moving the body’ has been established in two studies where the interpretation of the same auditory rhythm was shaped by different patterns in which the listeners bounced their body (PhillipsSilver & Trainor, 2005, 2007). Given this audio–motor interplay, the present study further pursued the hypothesis that the use of body movement is not merely a reaction to Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Y.-H. Su (&) Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr. 31, 80336 Munich, Germany e-mail: jasmine.su@med.uni-muenchen.de E. Pöppel Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany 123 Psychological Research (2012) 76:373–382 DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3

Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music

Temporal Modulations Reveal Distinct Rhythmic Properties of Speech and Music

Temporal Modulations in Speech and Music

Robust cortical encoding of slow temporal modulations of speech.

Musical Sophistication and Speech Auditory-Motor Coupling: Easy Tests for Quick Answers

Studying Rhythm Processing in Speech Through the Lens of Auditory-Motor Synchronization

The coupling between auditory and motor cortices is rate-restricted: Evidence for an intrinsic speech-motor rhythm

Music and speech distractors disrupt sensorimotor synchronization: effects of musical training

Steady-state evoked potentials distinguish brain mechanisms of self-paced versus synchronization finger tapping

Perception of temporal structure in speech is influenced by body movement and individual beat perception ability

The influence of external and internal motor processes on human auditory rhythm perception

Behavior-relevant periodized neural representation of acoustic but not tactile rhythm in humans

Rhythm Facilitates Auditory Working Memory via Beta-Band Encoding and Theta-Band Maintenance

Eyes robustly blink to musical beats like tapping

Head movements induced by voluntary neck flexion stabilize sensorimotor synchronization of the finger to syncopated auditory rhythms

The contribution of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to sensorimotor synchronization with external and imagined rhythm.

Cortical connectivity supports motoric synchronization to both auditory and visual rhythms in a frontal-temporal network

Temporal Structure of Music Improves the Cortical Encoding of Speech

Musical Meter Induces Interbrain Synchronization during Interpersonal Coordination

Reliable estimation of internal oscillator properties from a novel, fast-paced tapping paradigm

Auditory-motor entrainment and listening experience shape the perceptual learning of concurrent speech