Abstract:Auditory and motor systems interact in processing auditory rhythms. This study investigated the effect of intuitive body movement, such as head nodding or foot tapping, on listeners’ ability to entrain to the pulse of an auditory sequence. A pulse-finding task was employed using an isochronous sequence of tones in which tones were omitted at pseudorandom positions. Musicians and non-musicians identified their subjectively fitting pulse either using periodic body movement or through listening only. The identified pulse was measured subsequently by finger tapping. Movement appeared to assist pulse extraction especially for non-musicians. The chosen pulse tempi tended to be faster with movement. Additionally, movement led to higher synchronization stabilities of the produced pulse along the sequence, regardless of musical training. These findings demonstrated the facilitatory role of body movement in entraining to auditory rhythms and its interaction with musical training. Introduction Imagine sitting in a live jazz concert: the listeners feel immersed in the music and start intuitively to move along with different parts of their body. The same is seen in the musicians: they automatically move their head or tap their feet in a periodic manner while playing some rhythmically engaging passages. Even in a classical concert where excessive gestures are not encouraged by convention, we often observe musicians rhythmically moving some parts of their body that are not engaged in playing the instruments, along with the music. Moving one’s body periodically to the music, be it foot tapping or head nodding, is a frequent manifestation in listeners as well as in performing musicians. It presents a common example of audio–motor crosstalk in experiencing musical rhythms, and poses an interesting question about the nature of rhythm perception: do we move only because we react to the rhythm we hear, or does the movement itself contribute to the process of hearing the rhythm? Perception and action are believed to share common representational mechanisms through which they interact (Prinz, 1997). Neurophysiological studies on rhythm perception have also concurred that processing auditory rhythms engages both auditory and motor areas of the brain (Chen, Penhune, & Zatorre, 2008b; Grahn & Brett, 2007; Bengtsson et al., 2009), and the motor system can be crucial in this act (Grahn & Brett, 2009). A direct behavioral link between ‘hearing the rhythm’ and ‘moving the body’ has been established in two studies where the interpretation of the same auditory rhythm was shaped by different patterns in which the listeners bounced their body (PhillipsSilver & Trainor, 2005, 2007). Given this audio–motor interplay, the present study further pursued the hypothesis that the use of body movement is not merely a reaction to Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Y.-H. Su (&) Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr. 31, 80336 Munich, Germany e-mail: jasmine.su@med.uni-muenchen.de E. Pöppel Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany 123 Psychological Research (2012) 76:373–382 DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3

Eyes robustly blink to musical beats like tapping

Eye Activity Tracks Task-Relevant Structures During Speech and Auditory Sequence Perception

Behavior-relevant periodized neural representation of acoustic but not tactile rhythm in humans

Steady-state evoked potentials distinguish brain mechanisms of self-paced versus synchronization finger tapping

The effect of beat frequency on eye movements during free viewing

Tapping to drumbeats in an online experiment changes our perception of time and expressiveness

The rhythm of cognition – Effects of an auditory beat on oculomotor control in reading and sequential scanning

Eye-Hand Synchronization in Xylophone Performance: Two Case-Studies with African and Western Percussionists

Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature

Resonance and beat perception of ballroom dancers: An EEG study

Infant attention to rhythmic audiovisual synchrony is modulated by stimulus properties

Monkeys have rhythm

Neural tracking of the musical beat is enhanced by low-frequency sounds

Moving stimuli enhance beat timing and sensorimotor coupling in vision.

Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Vibrotactile Beat Perception and Bimodal Enhancement

The contribution of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to sensorimotor synchronization with external and imagined rhythm.

Sensory-motor synchronization in the brain corresponds to behavioral synchronization between individuals

Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal

The influence of external and internal motor processes on human auditory rhythm perception

Eye blinks as a visual processing stage

The Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Beat Processing and Its Relationship with Music-Related Characteristics of the Individual