Culturally Adapted RN-MD Collaborative SICP-Based ACP: Feasibility RCT in Advanced Cancer Patients

Sayaka Takenouchi,Yu Uneno,Shigemi Matsumoto,Ai Chikada,Ryuji Uozumi,Tomoko Izawa,Sayako Ouchi,Takako Kuroda,Yu Hidaka,Hitoshi Tanimukai,Motoo Nomura,Manabu Muto,Keiko Tamura,Satoru Tsuneto,Yoshiyuki Kizawa,Tatsuya Morita,Masanori Mori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.037
2024-09-03
Abstract:Context: Cultural adaptation is essential for optimizing programs centered around autonomy, such as the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), especially for populations valuing family-involved decision-making. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a culturally adapted SICP-based nurse-physician collaborative Advance Care Planning (ACP) intervention tailored for patients with advanced cancer who prefer family-involved decision-making. Methods: Oncology nurses, extensively trained and closely collaborating with physicians, conducted structured discussions with patients in the intervention group. The culturally adapted SICP-based ACP intervention was supplemented with trust-building, family involvement, and understanding of patient values. Primary inclusion criteria included patients within six weeks of initiating first-line palliative chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were achieving a 70% completion rate and assessing spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp) at six months. Secondary endpoints included anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), quality of life (QOL) (CoQoLo), and ACP progress (ACP Engagement Scale) at the same interval. Results: Forty-one patients (67.2%) completed the six-month follow-up, falling short of the targeted completion rate. The least-squares mean change from baseline in spiritual well-being at six months was 3.00 in the intervention group and -2.22 in the standard care group (difference, 5.22 points; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-9.06; p = .009). Similar superiority of the intervention was observed in QOL and ACP progress. Conclusion: Despite not meeting the targeted completion rate, the intervention group demonstrated enhanced spiritual well-being, QOL, and ACP progress. Our findings suggest revisions to the intervention manual to improve feasibility and to progress to an efficacy-focused randomized controlled trial.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?