Discussions Following Involvement in Advanced Care Planning Video Pilot Among AYAs with Cancer and Caregivers (GP118)

Jennifer M. Snaman,Deborah Feifer,Joanne Wolfe,Angelo Volandes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.513
IF: 5.576
2024-04-19
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. Identify and mitigate barriers to initiating advance care planning discussions with adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers. 2. Utilize a brief video-based advance care planning video as part of a multimodal strategy to engage adolescents and young adults with cancer in goals of care discussions to promote preference-based end of life care. Key Message A brief video-based advance care planning (ACP) tool is effective in prompting further discussions among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and their caregivers about their care preferences in advanced illness. Clinicians can use these tools as a gentle nudge to initiate discussions about care preferences. Importance Advance care planning (ACP) discussions can help adolescents and young adults (AYAs) communicate their preferences to their caregivers and clinical team, yet little is known about willingness to hold conversations, content, and evolution of care preference. Objective(s) This mixed methods study of an advance care planning video-based tool in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and their caregivers had two objectives: 1) to assess changes in AYA and caregiver care preferences and reasons for these changes over time, and 2) to explore factors influencing engagement in advance care planning discussions and content of these discussions in the three months following the intervention. Scientific Methods Utilized Convergent, mixed methods design of data from a 1:1 pilot randomized control trial of a 10 minute video based tool. We phoned participants 3 months post-intervention to assess care preferences and query if any ACP conversations occurred. Quantitative analysis of care preferences immediately following and three months after the intervention synthesized with content analysis of real-time notes from the study team from the three month visit. Results Forty-five AYAs and 40 caregivers completed the 3-month follow-up. Nearly half of AYAs and caregivers changed their care preference from post-intervention to follow-up. Increased reflection and learning on the topic (n=45) prompted preference change, with participants often noting the nuanced and context-specific nature of these decisions (n=20). Most AYAs (60%) and caregivers (65%) engaged in ACP conversation(s), often with a family member. Disease-related factors (n=8), study participation (n=8), and a desire for shared understanding (n=6) were common reasons for initiating discussions. Barriers included disease status (n=14) and timing (n=12). ACP discussions focused on both specific wishes for treatment (n=26) and general conversations about goals and values (n=18). Conclusion(s) AYAs and caregivers acknowledged the complexity of ACP decisions, pinpointing obstacles and aids for these discussions. Clinicians should support a personalized approach to ACP that captures these nuances, promoting ACP as an iterative, longitudinal, and collaborative process. Impact AYAs and caregivers recognize the complexity, nuance, and context-specific nature of ACP decisions, along with the associated emotional aspects. Future research can explore how clinicians can support these nuances among AYAs and promote ACP as an ongoing, longitudinal process.
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?