Identifying Conditions for Successful Advance Care Planning Implementation in Primary Care: Coincidence Analysis (RP108)

Seiko Izumi,Jessica Ma,Annette M. Totten

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.452

IF: 5.576

2024-04-20

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract:Outcomes 1. To describe strengths of the configurational analysis method to examine complex contextual factors contribute to successful advance care planning implementation. 2. Describe combination of conditions that lead to successful advance care planning implementation in primary care settings. Key Message Successful implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in practice is variable due to the complex and heterogeneous conditions each practice presents. Use of configurational analysis method is an innovative way to identify combinations of conditions that are necessary or sufficient for successful implementation of ACP in practice. Importance Broad implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in various practices is necessary to deliver value-based care. While established ACP programs exist, uniform implementation of these programs in different settings has been challenging due to the heterogeneity of local contexts. To enable efficient implementation of ACP in practices, there is a need for the knowledge what conditions are needed or sufficient for successful implementation of ACP. Objective(s) To identify combinations of conditions that lead to high degree of ACP implementation in primary care settings. Scientific Methods Utilized We implemented the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) in 40 primary care clinics in the US and Canada as part of PCORI-funded trial (PLC-1609-36277). Using the data from this trial, we conducted multi-value configurational analysis using the "cna R package" to identify the conditions led to high degree of SICP implementation. Responses from patient surveys ("Did your primary care clinician ask what is important to you/discuss your goals?") were used to determine a higher/lower level of SICP implementation for each clinic. Data characterizing the each clinic (i.e., clinic surveys, clinician surveys, and interviews from quarterly clinic visits) were used to identify conditions contributing to the implementation level. Results Twenty of 40 clinics were identified as a high implementation group where more than 50% of patients reported their primary care clinicians either asked about what is important to them or discussed their goals of care. Multiple combinations of clinic characteristics (e.g., size, location, ownership, practice culture, clinicians' intention to engage in ACP) and implementation factors (e.g., availability of supporting resources, leadership/team member engagement) are examined to select candidate conditions most likely to predict higher level of ACP implementation. Final findings of combinations of conditions to achieve higher levels of ACP implementation will be reported. Conclusion(s) Not only the existence of clinicians well-trained to facilitate ACP conversations but also combinations of certain practice culture, team relationship, and technical support are necessary conditions for successful implementation of ACP. Impact This knowledge of conditions that are necessary for successful ACP implementation would enhance efficiencies to assess practice readiness and select strategies to scale the ACP implementation effort. Keywords Advanced care planning/shared decision making\Qualitative and mixed methods research

medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services