The Influence of Preimplant Balancing on Manipulation under Anesthesia Rates Following Imageless Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Justin T Butler,Samuel D Stegelmann,Trent Ashton Davis,Amy Singleton,Hunter Ostlie,Richard M Miller,Kirk R Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2410-2668
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness (AIS) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often requires manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Robotic-assisted TKA (R-TKA) systems provide gap balance templates for objective correlation with the rate of AIS. The purpose of this study was to assess intraoperative balancing parameters that were associated with MUA utilizing an "anatomic" implant design. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 265 imageless R-TKA procedures performed by two senior surgeons between 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome for AIS or clinically significant "arthrofibrosis" was MUA. Patient intraoperative gap planning data was examined for association. Results: The rate of MUA was 8.7% (23/265), which was performed at a mean follow-up time of 75.9 ± 32.2 days. The lateral to medial gap difference in extension was significantly less in patients requiring MUA (OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75 - 0.99) (p = 0.034). Significantly less pre-operative varus mechanical axis was associated with knees requiring MUA (1.83° vs 4.04°, OR 1.09 95% CI 1.00-1.19). Decreased templated mechanical axis correction was associated with MUA (2.09° vs 4.75° p <0.0001). Conclusions: Tighter lateral to medial gap in extension, less pre-operative varus, and smaller templated mechanical axis corrections were associated with increased rates of manipulation under anesthesia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?